Miah
#1,484 for girls in 2025, 144 births · Last seen for boys in 2003 at #10,894
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2012 · 499 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 9,583since 1974
Miah over time
Rank among girls' names. Miah has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #1,484 | 144 | — | |
| 2024 | #1,083 | 229 | — | |
| 2023 | #1,107 | 222 | — | |
| 2022 | #1,084 | 231 | — | |
| 2021 | #1,072 | 234 | — | |
| 2020 | #1,058 | 235 | — | |
| 2019 | #866 | 309 | — | |
| 2018 | #819 | 331 | — | |
| 2017 | #797 | 344 | — | |
| 2016 | #626 | 477 | — | |
| 2015 | #615 | 470 | — | |
| 2014 | #619 | 463 | — | |
| 2013 | #585 | 488 | — | |
| 2012 | #584 | 499 | — | |
| 2011 | #586 | 492 | — | |
| 2010 | #695 | 411 | — | |
| 2009 | #696 | 417 | — | |
| 2008 | #780 | 376 | — | |
| 2007 | #796 | 361 | — | |
| 2006 | #765 | 359 | — | |
| 2005 | #765 | 347 | — | |
| 2004 | #942 | 255 | — | |
| 2003 | #862 | 280 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #832 | 280 | — | |
| 2001 | #981 | 219 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,120 | 182 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,047 | 194 | #9,912 | 5 |
| 1998 | #1,183 | 157 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,449 | 114 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,669 | 91 | — | |
| 1995 | #2,282 | 58 | — | |
| 1994 | #2,797 | 43 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,725 | 44 | — | |
| 1992 | #3,091 | 37 | — | |
| 1991 | #3,817 | 27 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,813 | 27 | — | |
| 1989 | #6,160 | 13 | — | |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | — | |
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | — | |
| 1986 | #7,749 | 8 | — | |
| 1985 | #8,318 | 7 | — | |
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #6,212 | 10 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,888 | 9 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,746 | 15 | — | |
| 1980 | #5,245 | 13 | — | |
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #5,958 | 10 | — | |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,601 | 10 | — | |
| 1975 | #9,067 | 5 | — | |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | — | |
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Miah! It came in at #8,775, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1979, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Miah is popular in 2016
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Mexico#205 · 1 in 704
- California#391 · 1 in 1,959
- Oregon#409 · 1 in 1,689
- Arizona#419 · 1 in 1,820
- Florida#463 · 1 in 2,282
Best ever in a state: #143 in North Dakota, 2000.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | #205 | 9 | 1 in 704 |
| California | #391 | 104 | 1 in 1,959 |
| Oregon | #409 | 9 | 1 in 1,689 |
| Arizona | #419 | 17 | 1 in 1,820 |
| Florida | #463 | 38 | 1 in 2,282 |
| Nevada | #470 | 6 | 1 in 1,860 |
| Connecticut | #527 | 5 | 1 in 2,465 |
| Texas | #545 | 62 | 1 in 2,698 |
| Massachusetts | #559 | 9 | 1 in 2,831 |
| New York | #564 | 31 | 1 in 2,898 |
| Ohio | #585 | 17 | 1 in 3,063 |
| Maryland | #617 | 8 | 1 in 3,005 |
| Michigan | #660 | 12 | 1 in 3,506 |
| Indiana | #675 | 9 | 1 in 3,366 |
| Minnesota | #697 | 7 | 1 in 3,506 |
| Kentucky | #721 | 5 | 1 in 3,652 |
| Missouri | #735 | 7 | 1 in 3,875 |
| Wisconsin | #746 | 6 | 1 in 3,884 |
| Tennessee | #759 | 8 | 1 in 3,880 |
| Pennsylvania | #763 | 12 | 1 in 4,321 |
| Oklahoma | #784 | 5 | 1 in 3,358 |
| Georgia | #848 | 11 | 1 in 4,368 |
| Washington | #869 | 7 | 1 in 4,592 |
| North Carolina | #1,002 | 8 | 1 in 5,664 |
| Virginia | #1,036 | 6 | 1 in 6,190 |
| New Jersey | #1,055 | 6 | 1 in 6,096 |
| Illinois | #1,088 | 9 | 1 in 6,403 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Miah
- 401 spots since 2024 (#1,083 → #1,484)
- 426 spots since 2020 (#1,058 → #1,484)
- 869 spots since 2015 (#615 → #1,484)
- Biggest jump: 177 spots in 2005 (#942 → #765)
- Biggest drop: 192 spots in 2020 (#866 → #1,058)
- Debuted 1974
- Peaked 2012 at #584 (499 births)
- Births halved by 2020, 8 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 19 yrs · run 2001–2019
- Highest: 1 in 3,529 girls born in 2012 were named Miah (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 11,162 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 44.7% of all girls named Miah (4,284) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 42 | #5,213 (1977) | #6,923 |
| 1980s | 94 | #4,746 (1981) | #6,708 |
| 1990s | 792 | #1,047 (1999) | #2,387 |
| 2000s | 3,076 | #696 (2009) | #854 |
| 2010s | 4,284 | #584 (2012) | #679 |
| 2020s | 1,295 | #1,058 (2020) | #1,148 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Miah in 2016
Top girls' names in 2016
More about 2016
girls
1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 3,715 of them was named Miah, which outranked 96.7% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).