Micah
#908 for girls in 2025, 291 births · #90 for boys in 2025, 3,817 births
Given to boys 89.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 2024 · 3,924 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 4 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 119,571since 1946
Micah over time
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #908 | 291 | #90 | 3,817 |
| 2024 | #839 | 322 | #86 | 3,924 |
| 2023 | #1,008 | 251 | #87 | 3,897 |
| 2022 | #1,130 | 217 | #89 | 3,969 |
| 2021 | #967 | 268 | #107 | 3,630 |
| 2020 | #1,050 | 238 | #106 | 3,414 |
| 2019 | #939 | 281 | #109 | 3,509 |
| 2018 | #971 | 272 | #103 | 3,780 |
| 2017 | #977 | 268 | #107 | 3,711 |
| 2016 | #964 | 281 | #115 | 3,498 |
| 2015 | #838 | 334 | #105 | 3,767 |
| 2014 | #989 | 270 | #109 | 3,666 |
| 2013 | #877 | 294 | #105 | 3,700 |
| 2012 | #865 | 307 | #103 | 3,765 |
| 2011 | #905 | 288 | #102 | 3,772 |
| 2010 | #840 | 319 | #108 | 3,571 |
| 2009 | #813 | 348 | #118 | 3,541 |
| 2008 | #888 | 313 | #121 | 3,528 |
| 2007 | #767 | 379 | #126 | 3,307 |
| 2006 | #711 | 401 | #145 | 2,841 |
| 2005 | #856 | 295 | #150 | 2,714 |
| 2004 | #759 | 344 | #161 | 2,489 |
| 2003 | #706 | 371 | #173 | 2,286 |
| 2002 | #640 | 397 | #173 | 2,224 |
| 2001 | #627 | 399 | #178 | 2,113 |
| 2000 | #636 | 393 | #186 | 1,975 |
| 1999 | #586 | 421 | #195 | 1,739 |
| 1998 | #582 | 415 | #199 | 1,692 |
| 1997 | #613 | 369 | #202 | 1,570 |
| 1996 | #626 | 359 | #209 | 1,478 |
| 1995 | #629 | 348 | #212 | 1,392 |
| 1994 | #716 | 289 | #246 | 1,169 |
| 1993 | #746 | 278 | #240 | 1,203 |
| 1992 | #768 | 270 | #242 | 1,195 |
| 1991 | #811 | 252 | #245 | 1,136 |
| 1990 | #905 | 212 | #238 | 1,180 |
| 1989 | #972 | 179 | #237 | 1,118 |
| 1988 | #852 | 210 | #224 | 1,114 |
| 1987 | #890 | 189 | #224 | 1,064 |
| 1986 | #891 | 184 | #217 | 1,101 |
| 1985 | #943 | 166 | #208 | 1,147 |
| 1984 | #867 | 175 | #207 | 1,113 |
| 1983 | #918 | 162 | #220 | 1,038 |
| 1982 | #966 | 153 | #216 | 1,123 |
| 1981 | #906 | 165 | #213 | 1,165 |
| 1980 | #1,064 | 133 | #228 | 1,048 |
| 1979 | #1,036 | 134 | #205 | 1,144 |
| 1978 | #954 | 146 | #215 | 1,006 |
| 1977 | #1,183 | 104 | #211 | 1,051 |
| 1976 | #1,167 | 98 | #226 | 900 |
| 1975 | #1,342 | 80 | #254 | 790 |
| 1974 | #1,315 | 81 | #272 | 694 |
| 1973 | #1,666 | 54 | #327 | 527 |
| 1972 | #1,989 | 40 | #407 | 373 |
| 1971 | #2,477 | 30 | #490 | 269 |
| 1970 | #2,779 | 25 | #539 | 225 |
| 1969 | #2,917 | 21 | #592 | 173 |
| 1968 | #3,456 | 15 | #660 | 130 |
| 1967 | #3,484 | 14 | #655 | 129 |
| 1966 | #3,040 | 17 | #713 | 108 |
| 1965 | #3,050 | 17 | #688 | 117 |
| 1964 | #3,879 | 12 | #772 | 96 |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | #781 | 95 |
| 1962 | #4,533 | 9 | #729 | 110 |
| 1961 | #4,546 | 9 | #758 | 103 |
| 1960 | #5,168 | 7 | #891 | 73 |
| 1959 | #4,031 | 10 | #950 | 65 |
| 1958 | #3,925 | 10 | #1,396 | 31 |
| 1957 | — | #1,715 | 22 | |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #1,608 | 24 |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | #1,503 | 26 |
| 1954 | #5,148 | 6 | #2,044 | 15 |
| 1953 | — | #2,287 | 12 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,073 | 14 | |
| 1951 | — | #2,135 | 13 | |
| 1950 | — | #1,879 | 16 | |
| 1949 | — | #1,820 | 17 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | #3,733 | 5 | |
| 1946 | — | #3,525 | 5 | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Micah! It came in at #3,525, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1946–1948, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Micah is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#20 · 1 in 106
- South Carolina#78 · 1 in 337
- Wyoming#82 · 1 in 229
- Alabama#82 · 1 in 344
- South Dakota#90 · 1 in 261
Best ever in a state: #8 in Hawaii, 2001.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #20 | 45 | 1 in 106 |
| South Carolina | #78 | 63 | 1 in 337 |
| Alabama | #82 | 69 | 1 in 344 |
| Wyoming | #82 | 9 | 1 in 229 |
| South Dakota | #90 | 16 | 1 in 261 |
| North Carolina | #91 | 128 | 1 in 409 |
| Mississippi | #97 | 38 | 1 in 388 |
| Tennessee | #99 | 91 | 1 in 405 |
| Georgia | #102 | 129 | 1 in 463 |
| Oregon | #107 | 49 | 1 in 397 |
| Montana | #111 | 11 | 1 in 358 |
| Virginia | #111 | 85 | 1 in 507 |
| Kentucky | #112 | 53 | 1 in 443 |
| Delaware | #113 | 9 | 1 in 452 |
| Alaska | #115 | 9 | 1 in 369 |
| District of Columbia | #117 | 11 | 1 in 399 |
| North Dakota | #117 | 10 | 1 in 353 |
| Ohio | #120 | 124 | 1 in 528 |
| Washington | #121 | 73 | 1 in 476 |
| Minnesota | #125 | 57 | 1 in 526 |
| Louisiana | #126 | 47 | 1 in 513 |
| Michigan | #129 | 92 | 1 in 595 |
| Pennsylvania | #132 | 102 | 1 in 625 |
| West Virginia | #136 | 15 | 1 in 599 |
| Indiana | #138 | 68 | 1 in 563 |
| Oklahoma | #140 | 39 | 1 in 529 |
| Nebraska | #142 | 21 | 1 in 491 |
| New Hampshire | #143 | 9 | 1 in 621 |
| Kansas | #144 | 31 | 1 in 530 |
| Maryland | #146 | 42 | 1 in 685 |
| Arkansas | #150 | 25 | 1 in 602 |
| Colorado | #152 | 51 | 1 in 588 |
| Wisconsin | #156 | 45 | 1 in 651 |
| Florida | #157 | 129 | 1 in 767 |
| Utah | #157 | 38 | 1 in 589 |
| Missouri | #160 | 48 | 1 in 709 |
| Iowa | #163 | 25 | 1 in 657 |
| Texas | #173 | 248 | 1 in 730 |
| Maine | #183 | 7 | 1 in 795 |
| New Mexico | #184 | 15 | 1 in 727 |
| Idaho | #195 | 12 | 1 in 717 |
| California | #200 | 266 | 1 in 956 |
| Nevada | #202 | 17 | 1 in 862 |
| Arizona | #209 | 47 | 1 in 903 |
| Connecticut | #219 | 13 | 1 in 1,291 |
| New York | #237 | 78 | 1 in 1,388 |
| Illinois | #239 | 63 | 1 in 1,225 |
| Massachusetts | #314 | 14 | 1 in 2,347 |
| New Jersey | #319 | 21 | 1 in 2,235 |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Micah
- 4 spots since 2024 (#86 → #90)
- 16 spots since 2020 (#106 → #90)
- 15 spots since 2015 (#105 → #90)
- Biggest jump: 446 spots in 1959 (#1,396 → #950)
- Biggest drop: 52 spots in 1963 (#729 → #781)
- Debuted 1946
- Peaked 2024 at #86 (3,924 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 4 yrs · run 2022–2025
- Top 1,000: 67 yrs · run 1959–2025
- Highest: 1 in 439 boys born in 2023 were named Micah (0.23%)
- Latest: 1 in 447 boys born in 2025 (0.22%)
- Its best rank, #86 in 2024, was only 1 in 439 (0.23%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 30.7% of all boys named Micah (36,739) were born in this decade
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 27 | #1,820 (1949) | #3,026 |
| 1950s | 238 | #950 (1959) | #1,759 |
| 1960s | 1,134 | #592 (1969) | #724 |
| 1970s | 6,979 | #205 (1979) | #315 |
| 1980s | 11,031 | #207 (1984) | #219 |
| 1990s | 13,754 | #195 (1999) | #223 |
| 2000s | 27,018 | #118 (2009) | #153 |
| 2010s | 36,739 | #102 (2011) | #107 |
| 2020s | 22,651 | #86 (2024) | #94 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Micah in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 6,264 of them was named Micah, which outranked 95.5% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 736 of them was named Micah, which outranked 98.9% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.