Mikel
Last seen for girls in 2018 at #11,427 · #1,919 for boys in 2025, 81 births
Given to boys 92.1% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1953 · 190 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 11,559since 1882
Mikel over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,919 | 81 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,776 | 92 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,623 | 107 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,540 | 116 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,565 | 111 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,437 | 120 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,441 | 121 | |
| 2018 | #11,427 | 8 | #1,217 | 154 |
| 2017 | — | #1,306 | 138 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,254 | 146 | |
| 2015 | #16,419 | 5 | #1,228 | 149 |
| 2014 | — | #1,147 | 165 | |
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | #1,162 | 155 |
| 2012 | — | #1,161 | 157 | |
| 2011 | #13,347 | 7 | #1,136 | 159 |
| 2010 | #13,448 | 7 | #1,108 | 172 |
| 2009 | #11,459 | 9 | #1,112 | 166 |
| 2008 | #7,742 | 16 | #1,041 | 182 |
| 2007 | #11,630 | 9 | #1,025 | 184 |
| 2006 | #11,417 | 9 | #985 | 188 |
| 2005 | #8,883 | 12 | #964 | 181 |
| 2004 | #6,768 | 17 | #871 | 201 |
| 2003 | #7,207 | 15 | #969 | 166 |
| 2002 | #8,280 | 12 | #948 | 169 |
| 2001 | #5,364 | 21 | #878 | 180 |
| 2000 | #4,981 | 23 | #850 | 188 |
| 1999 | #6,484 | 15 | #816 | 187 |
| 1998 | #4,955 | 21 | #858 | 169 |
| 1997 | #4,007 | 27 | #873 | 159 |
| 1996 | #4,306 | 24 | #838 | 170 |
| 1995 | #5,019 | 19 | #896 | 149 |
| 1994 | #4,115 | 25 | #866 | 153 |
| 1993 | #4,257 | 24 | #761 | 189 |
| 1992 | #4,686 | 21 | #850 | 155 |
| 1991 | #4,329 | 23 | #747 | 186 |
| 1990 | #4,380 | 22 | #755 | 182 |
| 1989 | #3,784 | 26 | #697 | 198 |
| 1988 | #4,496 | 19 | #746 | 161 |
| 1987 | #3,524 | 25 | #793 | 136 |
| 1986 | #4,724 | 16 | #777 | 136 |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 | #702 | 157 |
| 1984 | #4,166 | 18 | #769 | 126 |
| 1983 | #2,910 | 29 | #727 | 141 |
| 1982 | #2,250 | 44 | #766 | 131 |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | #775 | 126 |
| 1980 | #4,517 | 16 | #780 | 126 |
| 1979 | #3,236 | 25 | #751 | 133 |
| 1978 | #3,637 | 20 | #732 | 132 |
| 1977 | #3,486 | 21 | #746 | 130 |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #734 | 129 |
| 1975 | #2,969 | 24 | #719 | 132 |
| 1974 | #2,497 | 30 | #710 | 134 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #772 | 106 |
| 1972 | #4,793 | 11 | #746 | 113 |
| 1971 | #3,943 | 15 | #733 | 126 |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | #732 | 126 |
| 1969 | #2,844 | 22 | #715 | 120 |
| 1968 | #4,000 | 12 | #723 | 107 |
| 1967 | #3,656 | 13 | #723 | 105 |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #778 | 87 |
| 1965 | — | #732 | 103 | |
| 1964 | #3,244 | 16 | #737 | 109 |
| 1963 | #3,066 | 17 | #734 | 112 |
| 1962 | — | #657 | 139 | |
| 1961 | — | #669 | 136 | |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | #699 | 126 |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | #637 | 148 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #580 | 178 |
| 1957 | — | #556 | 194 | |
| 1956 | #4,161 | 9 | #556 | 186 |
| 1955 | — | #594 | 153 | |
| 1954 | — | #624 | 140 | |
| 1953 | #3,955 | 9 | #510 | 190 |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #681 | 104 |
| 1951 | — | #653 | 116 | |
| 1950 | #3,962 | 8 | #706 | 94 |
| 1949 | #4,673 | 6 | #779 | 78 |
| 1948 | — | #862 | 63 | |
| 1947 | #4,764 | 6 | #831 | 70 |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | #878 | 56 |
| 1945 | — | #1,016 | 39 | |
| 1944 | #4,054 | 6 | #1,152 | 33 |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #1,155 | 35 |
| 1942 | #2,986 | 10 | #1,467 | 23 |
| 1941 | #3,559 | 7 | #1,759 | 16 |
| 1940 | #3,503 | 7 | #1,680 | 17 |
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | #1,879 | 14 |
| 1938 | — | #2,646 | 8 | |
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | #3,103 | 8 | #2,184 | 11 |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #3,679 | 5 | |
| 1933 | — | #3,268 | 6 | |
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | #3,592 | 6 | |
| 1929 | — | #3,247 | 7 | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | #3,780 | 6 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | #4,197 | 5 | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | #2,950 | 9 | |
| 1922 | — | #4,307 | 5 | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | #3,208 | 8 | |
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | #4,179 | 5 | |
| 1917 | — | #3,217 | 7 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,389 | 11 | |
| 1915 | — | #3,082 | 7 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | #2,821 | 5 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | #943 | 5 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1882
The first year at least five boys were named Mikel! It came in at #943, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1882–1914, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Mikel is popular in 1957
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Kansas#247 · 1 in 2,202
- Utah#277 · 1 in 2,049
- Oklahoma#281 · 1 in 2,682
- Iowa#296 · 1 in 4,430
- Indiana#314 · 1 in 4,672
Best ever in a state: #205 in Utah, 1968.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kansas | #247 | 11 | 1 in 2,202 |
| Utah | #277 | 6 | 1 in 2,049 |
| Oklahoma | #281 | 9 | 1 in 2,682 |
| Iowa | #296 | 7 | 1 in 4,430 |
| Indiana | #314 | 12 | 1 in 4,672 |
| Missouri | #327 | 11 | 1 in 4,424 |
| Washington | #342 | 6 | 1 in 5,321 |
| Tennessee | #374 | 8 | 1 in 5,114 |
| Illinois | #398 | 16 | 1 in 7,259 |
| Texas | #486 | 23 | 1 in 5,429 |
| Florida | #534 | 5 | 1 in 10,007 |
| Michigan | #560 | 6 | 1 in 16,915 |
| Ohio | #601 | 6 | 1 in 19,892 |
| California | #610 | 13 | 1 in 13,545 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mikel
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 143 spots since 2024 (#1,776 → #1,919)
- 482 spots since 2020 (#1,437 → #1,919)
- 691 spots since 2015 (#1,228 → #1,919)
- Biggest jump: 171 spots in 1953 (#681 → #510)
- Biggest drop: 114 spots in 1954 (#510 → #624)
Rise & fade · boys
71 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1882
- Peaked 1953 at #510 (190 births)
- Births halved by 1966, 13 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 62 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 62 yrs · run 1946–2006
Share of babies · boys
1 in 9,876
- Highest: 1 in 9,876 boys born in 2004 were named Mikel (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 21,087 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #510 in 1953, was only 1 in 10,381 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2000s
- 15.6% of all boys named Mikel (1,805) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 5 | #943 (1882) | #943 |
| 1890s | 0 | — | — |
| 1900s | 0 | — | — |
| 1910s | 35 | #2,389 (1916) | #3,138 |
| 1920s | 46 | #2,950 (1923) | #3,628 |
| 1930s | 50 | #1,879 (1939) | #2,875 |
| 1940s | 430 | #779 (1949) | #1,158 |
| 1950s | 1,503 | #510 (1953) | #610 |
| 1960s | 1,144 | #657 (1962) | #717 |
| 1970s | 1,261 | #710 (1974) | #738 |
| 1980s | 1,438 | #697 (1989) | #753 |
| 1990s | 1,699 | #747 (1991) | #826 |
| 2000s | 1,805 | #850 (2000) | #964 |
| 2010s | 1,516 | #1,108 (2010) | #1,216 |
| 2020s | 627 | #1,437 (2020) | #1,643 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mikel in 1957
boys
#556
194 births · 1 in 11,120 boys
Top boys' names in 1957
More about 1957
boys
2,157,236 boys got a published name in 1957; 1 in 11,120 of them was named Mikel, which outranked 87.8% of the 4,552 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Mikel
Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Biggest movers since 1956
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.