Miko
- #5,410 for girls in 2025, 23 births
- #2,718 for boys in 2025, 47 births
- Given to boys 61.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2023 · 78 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 980since 1971
Miko over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,410 | 23 | #2,718 | 47 |
| 2024 | #12,161 | 7 | #2,418 | 57 |
| 2023 | #6,169 | 19 | #1,970 | 78 |
| 2022 | #6,229 | 19 | #2,022 | 75 |
| 2021 | #8,978 | 11 | #2,373 | 57 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | #2,925 | 40 |
| 2019 | #9,112 | 11 | #2,736 | 46 |
| 2018 | #8,146 | 13 | #2,796 | 43 |
| 2017 | #9,341 | 11 | #3,586 | 30 |
| 2016 | #8,393 | 13 | #3,230 | 35 |
| 2015 | #10,148 | 10 | #3,513 | 31 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | #3,532 | 30 |
| 2013 | #7,031 | 17 | #3,753 | 27 |
| 2012 | #8,208 | 14 | #5,035 | 18 |
| 2011 | #10,374 | 10 | #4,509 | 21 |
| 2010 | #11,246 | 9 | #3,994 | 25 |
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | #5,102 | 18 |
| 2008 | #12,579 | 8 | #5,067 | 18 |
| 2007 | #15,491 | 6 | #4,996 | 18 |
| 2006 | #8,715 | 13 | #5,072 | 17 |
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | #5,278 | 15 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #5,813 | 13 |
| 2003 | #11,325 | 8 | #3,732 | 23 |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #6,088 | 11 |
| 2001 | #11,020 | 8 | #6,935 | 9 |
| 2000 | — | #4,389 | 17 | |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #7,139 | 8 |
| 1998 | #9,260 | 9 | #4,873 | 13 |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | #4,668 | 13 |
| 1996 | #10,567 | 7 | #7,136 | 7 |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | #4,280 | 14 |
| 1994 | #11,778 | 6 | #3,215 | 21 |
| 1993 | #8,719 | 9 | #6,228 | 8 |
| 1992 | #8,065 | 10 | #4,564 | 12 |
| 1991 | #9,336 | 8 | #3,813 | 15 |
| 1990 | #7,880 | 10 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #4,811 | 10 |
| 1988 | #7,111 | 10 | — | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | #7,134 | 9 | — | |
| 1985 | #7,563 | 8 | — | |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | — | |
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #6,371 | 10 | #5,619 | 6 |
| 1981 | #5,885 | 11 | — | |
| 1980 | #9,095 | 6 | — | |
| 1979 | #5,751 | 11 | — | |
| 1978 | #5,214 | 12 | — | |
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | — | |
| 1976 | #6,048 | 9 | — | |
| 1975 | #4,370 | 14 | #4,309 | 7 |
| 1974 | #3,863 | 16 | — | |
| 1973 | — | #5,101 | 5 | |
| 1972 | #3,276 | 19 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #2,477 | 30 | #4,907 | 5 |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 | — | |
| 1969 | #3,774 | 14 | — | |
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,963 | 18 | — | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #5,891 | 6 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1971
The first year at least five boys were named Miko! It came in at #4,907, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1971–1974, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Miko is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- California#1,829 · 1 in 21,934
- Texas#2,574 · 1 in 35,010
Best ever in a state: #699 in Maryland, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #1,829 | 8 | 1 in 21,934 |
| Texas | #2,574 | 5 | 1 in 35,010 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Miko
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 300 spots since 2024 (#2,418 → #2,718)
- 207 spots since 2020 (#2,925 → #2,718)
- 795 spots since 2015 (#3,513 → #2,718)
Rise & fade · boys
52 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1971
- Peaked 2023 at #1,970 (78 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 21,930
- Highest: 1 in 21,930 boys born in 2023 were named Miko (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 36,342 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 36.1% of all boys named Miko (354) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2003
- Mostly girls until 2002, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 22 | #4,309 (1975) | #4,826 |
| 1980s | 21 | #4,811 (1989) | #5,556 |
| 1990s | 118 | #3,215 (1994) | #5,233 |
| 2000s | 159 | #3,732 (2003) | #5,247 |
| 2010s | 306 | #2,736 (2019) | #3,668 |
| 2020s | 354 | #1,970 (2023) | #2,404 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Miko ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: