Milo
- #5,722 for girls in 2025, 21 births
- #119 for boys in 2025, 2,974 births
- Given to boys 98.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2025 · 2,974 births
- Debut · boys
- 26 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 43,847since 1880
Milo over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Milo has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #5,722 | 21 | #119 | 2,974 |
| 2024 | #5,443 | 23 | #120 | 3,001 |
| 2023 | #4,191 | 34 | #121 | 2,971 |
| 2022 | #3,365 | 47 | #120 | 3,115 |
| 2021 | #3,935 | 37 | #127 | 2,918 |
| 2020 | #4,453 | 30 | #134 | 2,768 |
| 2019 | #3,665 | 41 | #162 | 2,442 |
| 2018 | #4,237 | 33 | #178 | 2,200 |
| 2017 | #4,922 | 27 | #224 | 1,705 |
| 2016 | #5,130 | 26 | #248 | 1,510 |
| 2015 | #8,447 | 13 | #288 | 1,284 |
| 2014 | #9,517 | 11 | #311 | 1,120 |
| 2013 | #6,729 | 18 | #312 | 1,098 |
| 2012 | #9,711 | 11 | #325 | 971 |
| 2011 | #9,150 | 12 | #358 | 838 |
| 2010 | #9,790 | 11 | #423 | 655 |
| 2009 | #10,679 | 10 | #450 | 618 |
| 2008 | #10,084 | 11 | #444 | 633 |
| 2007 | — | #539 | 476 | |
| 2006 | #15,152 | 6 | #673 | 338 |
| 2005 | — | #720 | 282 | |
| 2004 | — | #767 | 236 | |
| 2003 | — | #791 | 220 | |
| 2002 | — | #807 | 212 | |
| 2001 | — | #981 | 156 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,107 | 127 | |
| 1999 | — | #1,436 | 81 | |
| 1998 | — | #1,224 | 100 | |
| 1997 | — | #1,350 | 82 | |
| 1996 | — | #1,655 | 58 | |
| 1995 | — | #1,682 | 53 | |
| 1994 | — | #1,734 | 51 | |
| 1993 | — | #1,875 | 44 | |
| 1992 | — | #1,750 | 48 | |
| 1991 | — | #1,545 | 56 | |
| 1990 | — | #1,197 | 83 | |
| 1989 | — | #1,398 | 61 | |
| 1988 | — | #1,671 | 42 | |
| 1987 | — | #1,484 | 48 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,565 | 42 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,333 | 52 | |
| 1984 | — | #1,240 | 55 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,222 | 56 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,150 | 63 | |
| 1981 | — | #1,309 | 50 | |
| 1980 | — | #1,410 | 45 | |
| 1979 | — | #1,137 | 62 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,186 | 56 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,158 | 57 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,050 | 63 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,208 | 49 | |
| 1974 | #8,775 | 5 | #1,229 | 46 |
| 1973 | — | #1,014 | 63 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,107 | 54 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,057 | 59 | |
| 1970 | #7,995 | 5 | #1,117 | 54 |
| 1969 | — | #1,168 | 45 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,183 | 41 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,030 | 50 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,100 | 45 | |
| 1965 | — | #986 | 56 | |
| 1964 | — | #967 | 62 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,005 | 57 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,056 | 52 | |
| 1961 | — | #990 | 61 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,058 | 53 | |
| 1959 | — | #914 | 70 | |
| 1958 | — | #907 | 69 | |
| 1957 | — | #861 | 76 | |
| 1956 | — | #809 | 85 | |
| 1955 | — | #700 | 109 | |
| 1954 | — | #732 | 97 | |
| 1953 | — | #786 | 82 | |
| 1952 | — | #721 | 95 | |
| 1951 | — | #682 | 104 | |
| 1950 | — | #691 | 98 | |
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | #729 | 89 |
| 1948 | — | #669 | 102 | |
| 1947 | — | #732 | 88 | |
| 1946 | — | #676 | 91 | |
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | #650 | 86 |
| 1944 | — | #712 | 76 | |
| 1943 | — | #611 | 107 | |
| 1942 | — | #760 | 71 | |
| 1941 | — | #624 | 94 | |
| 1940 | — | #591 | 100 | |
| 1939 | — | #642 | 85 | |
| 1938 | — | #609 | 95 | |
| 1937 | — | #552 | 111 | |
| 1936 | — | #514 | 120 | |
| 1935 | — | #593 | 95 | |
| 1934 | — | #513 | 128 | |
| 1933 | — | #504 | 124 | |
| 1932 | — | #524 | 123 | |
| 1931 | — | #507 | 128 | |
| 1930 | — | #476 | 156 | |
| 1929 | — | #489 | 144 | |
| 1928 | — | #485 | 157 | |
| 1927 | — | #495 | 151 | |
| 1926 | — | #528 | 131 | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | #483 | 157 |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | #485 | 163 |
| 1923 | #4,376 | 6 | #465 | 174 |
| 1922 | — | #431 | 196 | |
| 1921 | #4,023 | 7 | #435 | 197 |
| 1920 | — | #399 | 217 | |
| 1919 | — | #419 | 196 | |
| 1918 | — | #432 | 185 | |
| 1917 | — | #407 | 193 | |
| 1916 | — | #399 | 193 | |
| 1915 | — | #400 | 180 | |
| 1914 | — | #390 | 149 | |
| 1913 | — | #408 | 112 | |
| 1912 | — | #393 | 95 | |
| 1911 | — | #432 | 45 | |
| 1910 | — | #512 | 30 | |
| 1909 | — | #436 | 33 | |
| 1908 | — | #463 | 28 | |
| 1907 | — | #375 | 36 | |
| 1906 | — | #394 | 30 | |
| 1905 | — | #549 | 18 | |
| 1904 | — | #466 | 21 | |
| 1903 | — | #430 | 22 | |
| 1902 | — | #415 | 24 | |
| 1901 | — | #353 | 27 | |
| 1900 | — | #490 | 22 | |
| 1899 | — | #402 | 21 | |
| 1898 | — | #418 | 22 | |
| 1897 | — | #422 | 20 | |
| 1896 | — | #338 | 31 | |
| 1895 | — | #476 | 18 | |
| 1894 | — | #367 | 25 | |
| 1893 | — | #401 | 20 | |
| 1892 | — | #312 | 35 | |
| 1891 | — | #441 | 16 | |
| 1890 | — | #434 | 17 | |
| 1889 | — | #446 | 17 | |
| 1888 | — | #416 | 20 | |
| 1887 | — | #340 | 23 | |
| 1886 | — | #348 | 24 | |
| 1885 | — | #388 | 21 | |
| 1884 | — | #375 | 22 | |
| 1883 | — | #381 | 20 | |
| 1882 | — | #332 | 27 | |
| 1881 | — | #389 | 19 | |
| 1880 | — | #334 | 26 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Milo was already there! It came in at #334, and was given to 26 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1883–1891, when fewer than 25 boys a year got the name.
Where Milo is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | #30 | 100 | 1 in 197 |
| Hawaii | #37 | 18 | 1 in 162 |
| Minnesota | #47 | 101 | 1 in 243 |
| Wyoming | #47 | 9 | 1 in 121 |
| Vermont | #48 | 9 | 1 in 135 |
| Nebraska | #49 | 40 | 1 in 220 |
| Idaho | #52 | 35 | 1 in 247 |
| Colorado | #54 | 103 | 1 in 261 |
| Montana | #55 | 18 | 1 in 209 |
| Oregon | #55 | 60 | 1 in 251 |
| Alaska | #56 | 12 | 1 in 189 |
| South Dakota | #64 | 17 | 1 in 226 |
| Washington | #66 | 107 | 1 in 307 |
| District of Columbia | #82 | 10 | 1 in 253 |
| Michigan | #87 | 106 | 1 in 379 |
| Maine | #91 | 14 | 1 in 275 |
| Iowa | #92 | 39 | 1 in 355 |
| Rhode Island | #97 | 11 | 1 in 284 |
| Wisconsin | #100 | 60 | 1 in 391 |
| Maryland | #106 | 53 | 1 in 432 |
| Kansas | #107 | 35 | 1 in 401 |
| Indiana | #109 | 71 | 1 in 446 |
| Missouri | #109 | 64 | 1 in 435 |
| Massachusetts | #112 | 64 | 1 in 422 |
| Ohio | #116 | 115 | 1 in 457 |
| Nevada | #119 | 26 | 1 in 434 |
| Pennsylvania | #119 | 107 | 1 in 488 |
| Delaware | #126 | 8 | 1 in 368 |
| Arizona | #129 | 68 | 1 in 481 |
| New York | #129 | 146 | 1 in 578 |
| New Hampshire | #130 | 11 | 1 in 409 |
| California | #133 | 306 | 1 in 573 |
| Virginia | #134 | 66 | 1 in 564 |
| Kentucky | #140 | 40 | 1 in 513 |
| West Virginia | #140 | 14 | 1 in 440 |
| New Jersey | #141 | 68 | 1 in 585 |
| Oklahoma | #142 | 33 | 1 in 536 |
| Florida | #145 | 149 | 1 in 641 |
| Georgia | #147 | 82 | 1 in 612 |
| New Mexico | #148 | 13 | 1 in 500 |
| North Carolina | #149 | 87 | 1 in 592 |
| Arkansas | #151 | 24 | 1 in 524 |
| Connecticut | #151 | 24 | 1 in 550 |
| Illinois | #155 | 76 | 1 in 652 |
| Tennessee | #168 | 58 | 1 in 634 |
| North Dakota | #170 | 7 | 1 in 479 |
| Mississippi | #182 | 17 | 1 in 637 |
| Louisiana | #191 | 27 | 1 in 709 |
| Texas | #193 | 199 | 1 in 880 |
| South Carolina | #212 | 26 | 1 in 815 |
| Alabama | #260 | 21 | 1 in 1,025 |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Milo
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 15 spots since 2020 (#134 → #119)
- Biggest jump: 174 spots in 2002
- Biggest drop: 144 spots in 1960
Rise & fade · boys
145 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2025 at #119 (2,974 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 108 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 108 yrs · run 1880–1959
Share of babies · boys
1 in 561
- Highest: 1 in 561 boys born in 2022 were named Milo (0.18%)
- Latest: 1 in 574 boys born in 2025 (0.17%)
- Its best rank, #119 in 2025, was only 1 in 574 (0.17%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 40.5% of all boys named Milo (17,747) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 219 | #332 (1882) | #375 |
| 1890s | 225 | #312 (1892) | #401 |
| 1900s | 261 | #353 (1901) | #437 |
| 1910s | 1,378 | #390 (1914) | #419 |
| 1920s | 1,687 | #399 (1920) | #470 |
| 1930s | 1,165 | #476 (1930) | #543 |
| 1940s | 904 | #591 (1940) | #675 |
| 1950s | 885 | #682 (1951) | #780 |
| 1960s | 522 | #967 (1964) | #1,054 |
| 1970s | 563 | #1,014 (1973) | #1,126 |
| 1980s | 514 | #1,150 (1982) | #1,378 |
| 1990s | 656 | #1,197 (1990) | #1,545 |
| 2000s | 3,298 | #444 (2008) | #728 |
| 2010s | 13,823 | #162 (2019) | #283 |
| 2020s | 17,747 | #119 (2025) | #124 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Milo ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: