Mina
- #595 for girls in 2025, 491 births
- #5,861 for boys in 2025, 15 births
- Given to girls 96.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1880 · 73 births
- Debut · girls
- 73 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 19,267since 1880
Mina over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Mina has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #595 | 491 | #5,861 | 15 |
| 2024 | #609 | 494 | #6,469 | 13 |
| 2023 | #586 | 512 | #7,289 | 11 |
| 2022 | #611 | 488 | #6,828 | 12 |
| 2021 | #590 | 507 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #661 | 435 | #8,067 | 9 |
| 2019 | #680 | 427 | #5,340 | 17 |
| 2018 | #625 | 480 | #6,036 | 14 |
| 2017 | #703 | 411 | #5,297 | 17 |
| 2016 | #741 | 384 | #3,524 | 31 |
| 2015 | #763 | 370 | #4,711 | 20 |
| 2014 | #688 | 412 | #5,066 | 18 |
| 2013 | #750 | 361 | #3,964 | 25 |
| 2012 | #839 | 318 | #4,251 | 23 |
| 2011 | #808 | 333 | #4,822 | 19 |
| 2010 | #963 | 266 | #5,047 | 18 |
| 2009 | #861 | 323 | #5,800 | 15 |
| 2008 | #905 | 304 | #4,901 | 19 |
| 2007 | #944 | 287 | #5,434 | 16 |
| 2006 | #996 | 260 | #5,781 | 14 |
| 2005 | #894 | 281 | #5,875 | 13 |
| 2004 | #884 | 276 | #5,007 | 16 |
| 2003 | #1,043 | 219 | #5,558 | 13 |
| 2002 | #946 | 236 | #4,919 | 15 |
| 2001 | #1,109 | 191 | #3,974 | 20 |
| 2000 | #1,142 | 178 | #6,316 | 10 |
| 1999 | #1,191 | 162 | #4,162 | 17 |
| 1998 | #1,228 | 148 | #4,413 | 15 |
| 1997 | #1,071 | 177 | #5,288 | 11 |
| 1996 | #1,246 | 140 | #4,613 | 13 |
| 1995 | #1,322 | 125 | #3,854 | 16 |
| 1994 | #1,105 | 162 | #5,109 | 11 |
| 1993 | #1,471 | 108 | #4,020 | 15 |
| 1992 | #1,947 | 71 | #3,604 | 17 |
| 1991 | #1,832 | 77 | #3,224 | 19 |
| 1990 | #2,081 | 63 | #4,167 | 13 |
| 1989 | #1,750 | 77 | #4,017 | 13 |
| 1988 | #1,968 | 61 | #3,705 | 13 |
| 1987 | #1,581 | 79 | #2,838 | 18 |
| 1986 | #2,116 | 50 | #3,882 | 11 |
| 1985 | #1,833 | 61 | #4,333 | 9 |
| 1984 | #1,788 | 60 | #2,956 | 15 |
| 1983 | #1,887 | 55 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #1,653 | 69 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #1,714 | 66 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,886 | 57 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | #1,832 | 58 | — | |
| 1978 | #2,305 | 39 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,091 | 45 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,027 | 43 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,963 | 45 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,999 | 42 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,939 | 42 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,890 | 44 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,212 | 36 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,160 | 37 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,635 | 54 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,387 | 65 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,336 | 67 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,548 | 52 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,715 | 43 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,610 | 50 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,839 | 40 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,511 | 55 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,640 | 47 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,597 | 49 | — | |
| 1959 | #1,643 | 44 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,417 | 56 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,407 | 56 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,298 | 64 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,186 | 71 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,249 | 63 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,248 | 60 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,386 | 49 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,190 | 61 | — | |
| 1950 | #1,259 | 53 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,050 | 73 | — | |
| 1948 | #1,049 | 71 | — | |
| 1947 | #1,059 | 70 | — | |
| 1946 | #1,006 | 70 | — | |
| 1945 | #1,003 | 59 | — | |
| 1944 | #937 | 68 | — | |
| 1943 | #1,006 | 62 | — | |
| 1942 | #873 | 78 | — | |
| 1941 | #903 | 66 | — | |
| 1940 | #772 | 83 | — | |
| 1939 | #785 | 76 | — | |
| 1938 | #737 | 87 | — | |
| 1937 | #778 | 77 | — | |
| 1936 | #840 | 65 | — | |
| 1935 | #744 | 82 | — | |
| 1934 | #697 | 92 | — | |
| 1933 | #736 | 80 | — | |
| 1932 | #667 | 102 | — | |
| 1931 | #697 | 92 | — | |
| 1930 | #655 | 110 | — | |
| 1929 | #683 | 105 | — | |
| 1928 | #695 | 101 | — | |
| 1927 | #638 | 126 | — | |
| 1926 | #655 | 121 | — | |
| 1925 | #664 | 123 | — | |
| 1924 | #681 | 119 | — | |
| 1923 | #634 | 134 | — | |
| 1922 | #628 | 137 | — | |
| 1921 | #652 | 127 | — | |
| 1920 | #599 | 143 | — | |
| 1919 | #576 | 145 | — | |
| 1918 | #576 | 153 | — | |
| 1917 | #505 | 172 | — | |
| 1916 | #477 | 178 | — | |
| 1915 | #491 | 156 | — | |
| 1914 | #532 | 109 | — | |
| 1913 | #453 | 120 | — | |
| 1912 | #494 | 93 | — | |
| 1911 | #427 | 91 | — | |
| 1910 | #480 | 71 | — | |
| 1909 | #456 | 67 | — | |
| 1908 | #453 | 64 | — | |
| 1907 | #439 | 66 | — | |
| 1906 | #388 | 78 | — | |
| 1905 | #397 | 72 | — | |
| 1904 | #378 | 75 | — | |
| 1903 | #338 | 86 | — | |
| 1902 | #373 | 73 | — | |
| 1901 | #337 | 83 | — | |
| 1900 | #349 | 92 | — | |
| 1899 | #325 | 85 | — | |
| 1898 | #305 | 104 | — | |
| 1897 | #300 | 92 | — | |
| 1896 | #281 | 107 | — | |
| 1895 | #294 | 94 | — | |
| 1894 | #274 | 103 | — | |
| 1893 | #262 | 105 | — | |
| 1892 | #258 | 105 | — | |
| 1891 | #221 | 119 | — | |
| 1890 | #258 | 95 | — | |
| 1889 | #245 | 90 | — | |
| 1888 | #227 | 104 | — | |
| 1887 | #270 | 61 | — | |
| 1886 | #228 | 80 | — | |
| 1885 | #218 | 82 | — | |
| 1884 | #260 | 56 | — | |
| 1883 | #178 | 89 | — | |
| 1882 | #180 | 76 | — | |
| 1881 | #192 | 62 | — | |
| 1880 | #175 | 73 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Mina was already there! It came in at #175, and was given to 73 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1969–1978, when fewer than 55 girls a year got the name.
Where Mina is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Oregon#273 · 1 in 1,004
- New York#350 · 1 in 1,632
- California#381 · 1 in 1,881
- Minnesota#397 · 1 in 1,652
- Washington#414 · 1 in 1,698
Best ever in a state: #145 in Hawaii, 2022.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon | #273 | 13 | 1 in 1,004 |
| New York | #350 | 48 | 1 in 1,632 |
| California | #381 | 86 | 1 in 1,881 |
| Minnesota | #397 | 13 | 1 in 1,652 |
| Pennsylvania | #414 | 26 | 1 in 1,796 |
| Washington | #414 | 17 | 1 in 1,698 |
| Connecticut | #459 | 6 | 1 in 1,917 |
| Massachusetts | #481 | 11 | 1 in 2,185 |
| Utah | #490 | 8 | 1 in 2,135 |
| Nevada | #508 | 5 | 1 in 1,840 |
| Virginia | #520 | 15 | 1 in 2,249 |
| Illinois | #541 | 18 | 1 in 2,463 |
| Michigan | #553 | 14 | 1 in 2,552 |
| Iowa | #565 | 5 | 1 in 2,354 |
| New Jersey | #572 | 13 | 1 in 2,731 |
| Ohio | #622 | 16 | 1 in 2,954 |
| Texas | #624 | 50 | 1 in 3,211 |
| Colorado | #634 | 8 | 1 in 2,916 |
| Georgia | #676 | 15 | 1 in 3,014 |
| North Carolina | #684 | 14 | 1 in 3,320 |
| Indiana | #721 | 8 | 1 in 3,489 |
| Maryland | #731 | 6 | 1 in 3,331 |
| Florida | #735 | 22 | 1 in 3,944 |
| Wisconsin | #791 | 5 | 1 in 4,052 |
| Arizona | #1,040 | 5 | 1 in 5,644 |
| Tennessee | #1,127 | 5 | 1 in 6,415 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mina
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 66 spots since 2020 (#661 → #595)
- Biggest jump: 163 spots in 2002
- Biggest drop: 133 spots in 1943
Rise & fade · girls
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #175 (73 births)
- Births halved by 1971, 91 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 87 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 87 yrs · run 1880–1942
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,246
- Highest: 1 in 1,246 girls born in 1880 were named Mina (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,273 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 19.5% of all girls named Mina (3,762) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 773 | #175 (1880) | #217 |
| 1890s | 1,009 | #221 (1891) | #278 |
| 1900s | 756 | #337 (1901) | #391 |
| 1910s | 1,288 | #427 (1911) | #501 |
| 1920s | 1,236 | #599 (1920) | #653 |
| 1930s | 863 | #655 (1930) | #734 |
| 1940s | 700 | #772 (1940) | #966 |
| 1950s | 577 | #1,186 (1955) | #1,328 |
| 1960s | 522 | #1,336 (1967) | #1,582 |
| 1970s | 431 | #1,832 (1979) | #2,042 |
| 1980s | 635 | #1,581 (1987) | #1,818 |
| 1990s | 1,233 | #1,071 (1997) | #1,449 |
| 2000s | 2,555 | #861 (2009) | #972 |
| 2010s | 3,762 | #625 (2018) | #756 |
| 2020s | 2,927 | #586 (2023) | #609 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Mina ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: