Mitch
#10,695 for boys in 2025, 6 births
- Peak · boys
- 1961 · 400 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 5,565since 1916
Mitch over time
Rank among boys' names. Mitch has never cracked the top 300 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | boys | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,695 | 6 |
| 2024 | #7,765 | 10 |
| 2023 | #6,897 | 12 |
| 2022 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #9,714 | 7 |
| 2020 | #6,296 | 13 |
| 2019 | #7,643 | 10 |
| 2018 | #5,320 | 17 |
| 2017 | #4,594 | 21 |
| 2016 | #5,318 | 17 |
| 2015 | #5,507 | 16 |
| 2014 | #4,866 | 19 |
| 2013 | #7,026 | 11 |
| 2012 | #5,035 | 18 |
| 2011 | #4,221 | 23 |
| 2010 | #4,366 | 22 |
| 2009 | #4,582 | 21 |
| 2008 | #5,067 | 18 |
| 2007 | #3,687 | 28 |
| 2006 | #4,520 | 20 |
| 2005 | #3,022 | 34 |
| 2004 | #3,217 | 30 |
| 2003 | #3,119 | 30 |
| 2002 | #2,428 | 41 |
| 2001 | #2,489 | 39 |
| 2000 | #2,525 | 37 |
| 1999 | #2,462 | 36 |
| 1998 | #1,741 | 58 |
| 1997 | #1,964 | 46 |
| 1996 | #2,218 | 37 |
| 1995 | #1,623 | 56 |
| 1994 | #1,332 | 77 |
| 1993 | #1,444 | 65 |
| 1992 | #1,525 | 58 |
| 1991 | #1,467 | 60 |
| 1990 | #1,238 | 79 |
| 1989 | #1,094 | 93 |
| 1988 | #987 | 96 |
| 1987 | #1,067 | 80 |
| 1986 | #1,049 | 79 |
| 1985 | #1,011 | 81 |
| 1984 | #1,280 | 52 |
| 1983 | #1,144 | 62 |
| 1982 | #969 | 86 |
| 1981 | #1,077 | 71 |
| 1980 | #1,042 | 75 |
| 1979 | #1,291 | 51 |
| 1978 | #1,326 | 47 |
| 1977 | #1,571 | 35 |
| 1976 | #1,502 | 36 |
| 1975 | #1,378 | 40 |
| 1974 | #1,198 | 48 |
| 1973 | #1,294 | 41 |
| 1972 | #1,060 | 58 |
| 1971 | #1,165 | 49 |
| 1970 | #921 | 75 |
| 1969 | #931 | 67 |
| 1968 | #825 | 80 |
| 1967 | #836 | 73 |
| 1966 | #766 | 90 |
| 1965 | #651 | 131 |
| 1964 | #581 | 185 |
| 1963 | #453 | 304 |
| 1962 | #427 | 351 |
| 1961 | #396 | 400 |
| 1960 | #442 | 331 |
| 1959 | #462 | 295 |
| 1958 | #463 | 285 |
| 1957 | #539 | 207 |
| 1956 | #868 | 74 |
| 1955 | #898 | 68 |
| 1954 | #1,101 | 46 |
| 1953 | #1,357 | 31 |
| 1952 | #1,430 | 28 |
| 1951 | #1,462 | 26 |
| 1950 | #1,879 | 16 |
| 1949 | #1,702 | 19 |
| 1948 | #1,519 | 23 |
| 1947 | #1,988 | 15 |
| 1946 | #2,271 | 11 |
| 1945 | #2,242 | 10 |
| 1944 | #3,430 | 5 |
| 1943 | #2,964 | 7 |
| 1942 | #2,940 | 7 |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #3,113 | 6 |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | #3,679 | 5 |
| 1933 | #3,268 | 6 |
| 1932 | — | |
| 1931 | — | |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | — | |
| 1926 | — | |
| 1925 | — | |
| 1924 | — | |
| 1923 | — | |
| 1922 | — | |
| 1921 | — | |
| 1920 | — | |
| 1919 | — | |
| 1918 | — | |
| 1917 | — | |
| 1916 | #3,897 | 5 |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | — | |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | — | |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
The first year at least five boys were named Mitch! It came in at #3,897, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1916–1932, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Mitch is popular in 1962
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Nevada#129 · 1 in 562
- Nebraska#201 · 1 in 1,616
- Oklahoma#217 · 1 in 1,472
- Washington#231 · 1 in 2,037
- Kansas#236 · 1 in 1,831
Best ever in a state: #129 in Nevada, 1962.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nevada | #129 | 6 | 1 in 562 |
| Nebraska | #201 | 10 | 1 in 1,616 |
| Oklahoma | #217 | 16 | 1 in 1,472 |
| Washington | #231 | 15 | 1 in 2,037 |
| Kansas | #236 | 12 | 1 in 1,831 |
| Utah | #244 | 7 | 1 in 1,724 |
| Colorado | #254 | 11 | 1 in 1,961 |
| Wisconsin | #259 | 12 | 1 in 3,792 |
| Iowa | #275 | 9 | 1 in 3,231 |
| Oregon | #290 | 6 | 1 in 2,868 |
| Missouri | #292 | 14 | 1 in 3,321 |
| Minnesota | #293 | 8 | 1 in 5,064 |
| California | #319 | 58 | 1 in 3,225 |
| Indiana | #337 | 11 | 1 in 4,752 |
| South Carolina | #338 | 8 | 1 in 3,403 |
| Tennessee | #351 | 9 | 1 in 4,304 |
| Arkansas | #361 | 5 | 1 in 3,913 |
| Georgia | #394 | 10 | 1 in 4,689 |
| Alabama | #412 | 7 | 1 in 5,197 |
| Ohio | #421 | 12 | 1 in 8,789 |
| Louisiana | #466 | 8 | 1 in 5,054 |
| Michigan | #466 | 8 | 1 in 11,044 |
| Texas | #527 | 19 | 1 in 6,280 |
| North Carolina | #548 | 5 | 1 in 10,291 |
| Illinois | #549 | 9 | 1 in 12,246 |
| Florida | #612 | 5 | 1 in 10,837 |
| New York | #919 | 5 | 1 in 34,961 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mitch
- 2,930 spots since 2024 (#7,765 → #10,695)
- 4,399 spots since 2020 (#6,296 → #10,695)
- 5,188 spots since 2015 (#5,507 → #10,695)
- Biggest jump: 329 spots in 1957 (#868 → #539)
- Biggest drop: 244 spots in 1971 (#921 → #1,165)
- Debuted 1916
- Peaked 1961 at #396 (400 births)
- Births halved by 1964, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 18 yrs · run 1955–1970
- Highest: 1 in 5,310 boys born in 1961 were named Mitch (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 284,679 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 36.2% of all boys named Mitch (2,012) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 5 | #3,897 (1916) | #3,897 |
| 1920s | 0 | — | — |
| 1930s | 17 | #3,113 (1939) | #3,353 |
| 1940s | 102 | #1,519 (1948) | #2,502 |
| 1950s | 1,076 | #462 (1959) | #1,046 |
| 1960s | 2,012 | #396 (1961) | #631 |
| 1970s | 480 | #921 (1970) | #1,271 |
| 1980s | 775 | #969 (1982) | #1,072 |
| 1990s | 572 | #1,238 (1990) | #1,701 |
| 2000s | 298 | #2,428 (2002) | #3,466 |
| 2010s | 174 | #4,221 (2011) | #5,390 |
| 2020s | 54 | #6,296 (2020) | #8,705 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mitch in 1962
Top boys' names in 1962
More about 1962
boys
2,068,772 boys got a published name in 1962; 1 in 5,894 of them was named Mitch, which outranked 90.8% of the 4,631 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.