Mitchel
Last seen for girls in 2005 at #16,462 · #7,679 for boys in 2025, 10 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1958 · 260 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 13,287since 1880
Mitchel over time
Rank among boys' names. Mitchel has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #7,679 | 10 | |
| 2024 | — | #6,199 | 14 | |
| 2023 | — | #5,255 | 18 | |
| 2022 | — | #6,147 | 14 | |
| 2021 | — | #6,698 | 12 | |
| 2020 | — | #5,980 | 14 | |
| 2019 | — | #4,337 | 23 | |
| 2018 | — | #4,094 | 25 | |
| 2017 | — | #4,105 | 25 | |
| 2016 | — | #4,098 | 25 | |
| 2015 | — | #4,407 | 22 | |
| 2014 | — | #3,532 | 30 | |
| 2013 | — | #3,753 | 27 | |
| 2012 | — | #3,115 | 36 | |
| 2011 | — | #2,284 | 56 | |
| 2010 | — | #2,511 | 49 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,873 | 77 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,719 | 88 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,760 | 84 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,479 | 103 | |
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #1,302 | 117 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #1,225 | 124 |
| 2003 | — | #1,041 | 150 | |
| 2002 | — | #924 | 173 | |
| 2001 | — | #918 | 170 | |
| 2000 | — | #750 | 225 | |
| 1999 | — | #685 | 246 | |
| 1998 | — | #642 | 274 | |
| 1997 | — | #593 | 299 | |
| 1996 | — | #565 | 323 | |
| 1995 | — | #528 | 366 | |
| 1994 | — | #498 | 407 | |
| 1993 | — | #530 | 375 | |
| 1992 | — | #607 | 289 | |
| 1991 | — | #571 | 313 | |
| 1990 | — | #573 | 312 | |
| 1989 | #10,847 | 6 | #594 | 269 |
| 1988 | — | #595 | 247 | |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #589 | 236 |
| 1986 | — | #634 | 199 | |
| 1985 | — | #693 | 161 | |
| 1984 | — | #677 | 163 | |
| 1983 | — | #752 | 132 | |
| 1982 | — | #758 | 135 | |
| 1981 | — | #767 | 130 | |
| 1980 | — | #889 | 102 | |
| 1979 | — | #930 | 89 | |
| 1978 | — | #920 | 88 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,054 | 67 | |
| 1976 | — | #933 | 80 | |
| 1975 | — | #857 | 94 | |
| 1974 | — | #936 | 76 | |
| 1973 | — | #852 | 86 | |
| 1972 | — | #770 | 107 | |
| 1971 | — | #803 | 100 | |
| 1970 | — | #823 | 97 | |
| 1969 | — | #769 | 103 | |
| 1968 | — | #660 | 130 | |
| 1967 | — | #716 | 107 | |
| 1966 | — | #618 | 144 | |
| 1965 | — | #656 | 128 | |
| 1964 | — | #590 | 179 | |
| 1963 | — | #562 | 197 | |
| 1962 | — | #554 | 203 | |
| 1961 | — | #540 | 217 | |
| 1960 | — | #527 | 225 | |
| 1959 | — | #493 | 252 | |
| 1958 | — | #486 | 260 | |
| 1957 | — | #544 | 202 | |
| 1956 | — | #536 | 196 | |
| 1955 | — | #529 | 192 | |
| 1954 | — | #593 | 155 | |
| 1953 | — | #557 | 161 | |
| 1952 | — | #552 | 161 | |
| 1951 | — | #598 | 135 | |
| 1950 | — | #616 | 124 | |
| 1949 | — | #628 | 118 | |
| 1948 | — | #671 | 101 | |
| 1947 | — | #758 | 82 | |
| 1946 | — | #746 | 78 | |
| 1945 | — | #830 | 57 | |
| 1944 | — | #841 | 56 | |
| 1943 | — | #787 | 69 | |
| 1942 | — | #876 | 56 | |
| 1941 | — | #850 | 55 | |
| 1940 | — | #967 | 44 | |
| 1939 | — | #992 | 41 | |
| 1938 | — | #921 | 47 | |
| 1937 | — | #1,148 | 33 | |
| 1936 | — | #1,243 | 28 | |
| 1935 | — | #1,020 | 39 | |
| 1934 | — | #888 | 50 | |
| 1933 | — | #1,094 | 36 | |
| 1932 | — | #1,056 | 40 | |
| 1931 | — | #983 | 45 | |
| 1930 | — | #1,093 | 40 | |
| 1929 | — | #1,010 | 45 | |
| 1928 | — | #1,031 | 45 | |
| 1927 | — | #964 | 52 | |
| 1926 | — | #855 | 60 | |
| 1925 | — | #909 | 55 | |
| 1924 | — | #1,032 | 47 | |
| 1923 | — | #1,008 | 48 | |
| 1922 | — | #891 | 60 | |
| 1921 | — | #939 | 56 | |
| 1920 | — | #853 | 63 | |
| 1919 | — | #839 | 61 | |
| 1918 | — | #889 | 56 | |
| 1917 | — | #919 | 48 | |
| 1916 | — | #922 | 47 | |
| 1915 | — | #846 | 53 | |
| 1914 | — | #770 | 47 | |
| 1913 | — | #789 | 36 | |
| 1912 | — | #735 | 34 | |
| 1911 | — | #732 | 19 | |
| 1910 | — | #1,045 | 10 | |
| 1909 | — | #1,020 | 9 | |
| 1908 | — | #779 | 12 | |
| 1907 | — | #634 | 16 | |
| 1906 | — | #1,111 | 6 | |
| 1905 | — | #1,091 | 6 | |
| 1904 | — | #760 | 10 | |
| 1903 | — | #783 | 9 | |
| 1902 | — | #933 | 7 | |
| 1901 | — | #943 | 6 | |
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | #1,121 | 5 | |
| 1897 | — | #852 | 7 | |
| 1896 | — | #826 | 8 | |
| 1895 | — | #685 | 10 | |
| 1894 | — | #954 | 6 | |
| 1893 | — | #650 | 10 | |
| 1892 | — | #641 | 11 | |
| 1891 | — | #841 | 6 | |
| 1890 | — | #994 | 5 | |
| 1889 | — | #673 | 9 | |
| 1888 | — | #815 | 7 | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | #892 | 5 | |
| 1882 | — | #611 | 10 | |
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | #809 | 6 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Mitchel was already there! It came in at #809, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Mitchel is popular in 2005
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Iowa#469 · 1 in 3,283
- Wisconsin#539 · 1 in 4,187
- Ohio#624 · 1 in 5,957
- Michigan#761 · 1 in 6,842
- Washington#807 · 1 in 6,945
Best ever in a state: #133 in Minnesota, 1995.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa | #469 | 5 | 1 in 3,283 |
| Wisconsin | #539 | 7 | 1 in 4,187 |
| Ohio | #624 | 11 | 1 in 5,957 |
| Michigan | #761 | 8 | 1 in 6,842 |
| Washington | #807 | 5 | 1 in 6,945 |
| Pennsylvania | #834 | 7 | 1 in 9,112 |
| Florida | #996 | 10 | 1 in 9,900 |
| New York | #1,125 | 9 | 1 in 12,031 |
| Illinois | #1,135 | 6 | 1 in 12,858 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Mitchel
- 1,480 spots since 2024 (#6,199 → #7,679)
- 1,699 spots since 2020 (#5,980 → #7,679)
- 3,272 spots since 2015 (#4,407 → #7,679)
- Biggest jump: 477 spots in 1907 (#1,111 → #634)
- Biggest drop: 331 spots in 1905 (#760 → #1,091)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1958 at #486 (260 births)
- Births halved by 1965, 7 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 100 yrs · run 1938–1976
- Highest: 1 in 4,747 boys born in 1994 were named Mitchel (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 170,808 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #486 in 1958, was only 1 in 8,163 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 24.1% of all boys named Mitchel (3,204) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 37 | #611 (1882) | #760 |
| 1890s | 68 | #641 (1892) | #840 |
| 1900s | 81 | #634 (1907) | #895 |
| 1910s | 411 | #732 (1911) | #849 |
| 1920s | 531 | #853 (1920) | #949 |
| 1930s | 399 | #888 (1934) | #1,044 |
| 1940s | 716 | #628 (1949) | #795 |
| 1950s | 1,838 | #486 (1958) | #550 |
| 1960s | 1,633 | #527 (1960) | #619 |
| 1970s | 884 | #770 (1972) | #888 |
| 1980s | 1,774 | #589 (1987) | #695 |
| 1990s | 3,204 | #498 (1994) | #579 |
| 2000s | 1,311 | #750 (2000) | #1,299 |
| 2010s | 318 | #2,284 (2011) | #3,624 |
| 2020s | 82 | #5,255 (2023) | #6,326 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Mitchel in 2005
Top girls' names in 2005
Top boys' names in 2005
More about 2005
girls
1,847,842 girls got a published name in 2005; 1 in 369,568 of them was named Mitchel, which outranked 14.3% of the 19,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,997,305 boys got a published name in 2005; 1 in 17,071 of them was named Mitchel, which outranked 90.3% of the 13,370 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 10.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,296Karon118
- #1,296Milan118
- #1,296Shimon118
- #1,302Mitchel117
- #1,302Braedyn117
- #1,302Briar117
- #1,302Jamaal117
- #1,307Avraham116
- #1,307Brant116
- #1,307Gianluca116
Tied with 4 names at #1,302; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.