Myrtle
#10,917 for girls in 2025, 8 births · Last seen for boys in 1943 at #3,538
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1894 · 1,818 births
- Debut · girls
- 615 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 46 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 136,486since 1880
Myrtle over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,917 | 8 | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | — | |
| 2022 | #13,592 | 6 | — | |
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | #8,597 | 12 | — | |
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | #16,215 | 5 | — | |
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | #10,955 | 9 | — | |
| 2013 | #16,547 | 5 | — | |
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | #14,502 | 6 | — | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | #12,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | — | |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | — | |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | — | |
| 1993 | #10,588 | 7 | — | |
| 1992 | #11,738 | 6 | — | |
| 1991 | #8,588 | 9 | — | |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | — | |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | — | |
| 1988 | #9,244 | 7 | — | |
| 1987 | #5,613 | 13 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,964 | 15 | — | |
| 1985 | #6,457 | 10 | — | |
| 1984 | #4,478 | 16 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,884 | 14 | — | |
| 1982 | #3,418 | 24 | — | |
| 1981 | #4,162 | 18 | — | |
| 1980 | #3,134 | 27 | — | |
| 1979 | #3,541 | 22 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,388 | 22 | — | |
| 1977 | #2,715 | 30 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,792 | 27 | — | |
| 1975 | #2,097 | 41 | — | |
| 1974 | #2,290 | 34 | — | |
| 1973 | #2,171 | 36 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,093 | 37 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,625 | 57 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,781 | 50 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,355 | 71 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,279 | 74 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,147 | 85 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,129 | 88 | — | |
| 1965 | #944 | 117 | — | |
| 1964 | #997 | 115 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,016 | 110 | — | |
| 1962 | #871 | 145 | — | |
| 1961 | #768 | 186 | — | |
| 1960 | #769 | 175 | — | |
| 1959 | #753 | 182 | — | |
| 1958 | #704 | 196 | — | |
| 1957 | #648 | 229 | — | |
| 1956 | #589 | 257 | — | |
| 1955 | #519 | 316 | — | |
| 1954 | #490 | 325 | — | |
| 1953 | #442 | 378 | — | |
| 1952 | #450 | 366 | — | |
| 1951 | #418 | 397 | — | |
| 1950 | #375 | 460 | — | |
| 1949 | #339 | 523 | — | |
| 1948 | #336 | 537 | — | |
| 1947 | #319 | 596 | — | |
| 1946 | #308 | 571 | — | |
| 1945 | #277 | 621 | — | |
| 1944 | #262 | 686 | — | |
| 1943 | #232 | 843 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #218 | 911 | — | |
| 1941 | #194 | 966 | #3,505 | 5 |
| 1940 | #184 | 1,020 | #3,459 | 5 |
| 1939 | #179 | 1,064 | — | |
| 1938 | #182 | 1,114 | #2,868 | 7 |
| 1937 | #169 | 1,194 | #2,332 | 10 |
| 1936 | #160 | 1,240 | #2,301 | 10 |
| 1935 | #153 | 1,312 | #2,951 | 7 |
| 1934 | #141 | 1,435 | #2,742 | 8 |
| 1933 | #142 | 1,398 | #3,642 | 5 |
| 1932 | #135 | 1,669 | #2,313 | 11 |
| 1931 | #134 | 1,711 | #1,770 | 17 |
| 1930 | #123 | 1,997 | #1,964 | 15 |
| 1929 | #117 | 2,126 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1928 | #116 | 2,243 | #1,960 | 16 |
| 1927 | #109 | 2,550 | #2,703 | 10 |
| 1926 | #101 | 2,756 | #2,074 | 15 |
| 1925 | #95 | 2,980 | #2,936 | 9 |
| 1924 | #89 | 3,205 | #3,023 | 9 |
| 1923 | #84 | 3,314 | #2,950 | 9 |
| 1922 | #75 | 3,649 | #3,872 | 6 |
| 1921 | #73 | 3,791 | #2,265 | 14 |
| 1920 | #68 | 3,955 | #3,208 | 8 |
| 1919 | #67 | 3,816 | #2,665 | 10 |
| 1918 | #62 | 4,076 | #1,827 | 18 |
| 1917 | #58 | 4,046 | #1,815 | 17 |
| 1916 | #58 | 3,960 | #2,043 | 14 |
| 1915 | #58 | 3,865 | #1,454 | 22 |
| 1914 | #60 | 3,049 | #2,457 | 8 |
| 1913 | #53 | 2,843 | #2,092 | 8 |
| 1912 | #50 | 2,599 | #2,544 | 5 |
| 1911 | #50 | 2,033 | #1,290 | 8 |
| 1910 | #43 | 2,145 | #1,314 | 7 |
| 1909 | #43 | 1,950 | #1,440 | 5 |
| 1908 | #43 | 1,952 | #1,113 | 7 |
| 1907 | #39 | 1,929 | #1,094 | 7 |
| 1906 | #37 | 1,921 | #1,004 | 7 |
| 1905 | #33 | 2,026 | — | |
| 1904 | #34 | 1,905 | #1,064 | 6 |
| 1903 | #29 | 1,980 | #595 | 14 |
| 1902 | #32 | 1,884 | #794 | 9 |
| 1901 | #28 | 1,892 | #727 | 9 |
| 1900 | #32 | 2,252 | — | |
| 1899 | #30 | 1,821 | #857 | 7 |
| 1898 | #29 | 2,090 | #885 | 7 |
| 1897 | #29 | 1,833 | — | |
| 1896 | #30 | 1,928 | #592 | 13 |
| 1895 | #28 | 1,938 | #609 | 12 |
| 1894 | #27 | 1,818 | #954 | 6 |
| 1893 | #29 | 1,759 | #768 | 8 |
| 1892 | #32 | 1,666 | #1,066 | 5 |
| 1891 | #31 | 1,458 | #841 | 6 |
| 1890 | #34 | 1,406 | #994 | 5 |
| 1889 | #33 | 1,361 | #628 | 10 |
| 1888 | #35 | 1,310 | — | |
| 1887 | #36 | 1,087 | #752 | 7 |
| 1886 | #35 | 1,094 | #694 | 8 |
| 1885 | #34 | 1,026 | #936 | 5 |
| 1884 | #34 | 979 | #848 | 6 |
| 1883 | #37 | 851 | — | |
| 1882 | #38 | 803 | — | |
| 1881 | #37 | 643 | — | |
| 1880 | #40 | 615 | #909 | 5 |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Myrtle was already there! It came in at #40, and was given to 615 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1998–2004, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Myrtle is popular in 1900
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Myrtle
Momentum · girls
Brand new
- Biggest jump: 53 spots in 1965 (#997 → #944)
- Biggest drop: 185 spots in 1966 (#944 → #1,129)
Rise & fade · girls
14 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1894 at #27 (1,818 births)
- Births halved by 1943, 49 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 100 for 46 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 46 yrs · run 1880–1925
- Top 1,000: 85 yrs · run 1880–1962
Share of babies · girls
1 in 121
- Highest: 1 in 121 girls born in 1895 were named Myrtle (0.83%)
- Latest: 1 in 200,908 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #27 in 1894, was only 1 in 123 (0.82%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1910s
- 23.8% of all girls named Myrtle (32,432) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 9,769 | #33 (1889) | #36 |
| 1890s | 17,717 | #27 (1894) | #30 |
| 1900s | 19,691 | #28 (1901) | #35 |
| 1910s | 32,432 | #43 (1910) | #56 |
| 1920s | 30,569 | #68 (1920) | #93 |
| 1930s | 14,134 | #123 (1930) | #152 |
| 1940s | 7,274 | #184 (1940) | #267 |
| 1950s | 3,106 | #375 (1950) | #539 |
| 1960s | 1,166 | #768 (1961) | #1,028 |
| 1970s | 356 | #1,625 (1971) | #2,449 |
| 1980s | 153 | #3,134 (1980) | #5,439 |
| 1990s | 62 | #8,588 (1991) | #9,923 |
| 2000s | 6 | #14,502 (2005) | #14,502 |
| 2010s | 31 | #8,597 (2019) | #13,079 |
| 2020s | 20 | #10,917 (2025) | #12,657 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Myrtle in 1900
girls
#32
2,252 births · 1 in 133 girls
Top girls' names in 1900
More about 1900
girls
299,784 girls got a published name in 1900; 1 in 133 of them was named Myrtle, which outranked 98.6% of the 2,223 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 19.5% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Myrtle
Biggest movers since 1899
Risers
- ↑ 940Rosia#1,596 → #656
- ↑ 763Josiephine#1,596 → #833
- ↑ 763Lelar#1,596 → #833
- ↑ 736Carmel#1,596 → #860
- ↑ 722Gloria#1,278 → #556
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.