Nadia
- #565 for girls in 2025, 531 births
- Last seen for boys in 2009 at #12,491
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2005 · 1,923 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 46,556since 1911
Nadia over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Nadia has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #565 | 531 | — | |
| 2024 | #513 | 600 | — | |
| 2023 | #489 | 625 | — | |
| 2022 | #437 | 720 | — | |
| 2021 | #459 | 684 | — | |
| 2020 | #468 | 658 | — | |
| 2019 | #414 | 756 | — | |
| 2018 | #394 | 779 | — | |
| 2017 | #401 | 783 | — | |
| 2016 | #358 | 915 | — | |
| 2015 | #345 | 953 | — | |
| 2014 | #288 | 1,126 | — | |
| 2013 | #325 | 996 | — | |
| 2012 | #293 | 1,090 | — | |
| 2011 | #270 | 1,182 | — | |
| 2010 | #248 | 1,288 | — | |
| 2009 | #246 | 1,345 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | #219 | 1,540 | — | |
| 2007 | #198 | 1,721 | — | |
| 2006 | #188 | 1,870 | — | |
| 2005 | #178 | 1,923 | — | |
| 2004 | #214 | 1,585 | #9,948 | 6 |
| 2003 | #208 | 1,580 | — | |
| 2002 | #216 | 1,499 | — | |
| 2001 | #239 | 1,331 | — | |
| 2000 | #256 | 1,271 | — | |
| 1999 | #330 | 916 | — | |
| 1998 | #319 | 943 | — | |
| 1997 | #333 | 857 | — | |
| 1996 | #356 | 779 | — | |
| 1995 | #389 | 681 | — | |
| 1994 | #462 | 548 | — | |
| 1993 | #437 | 572 | — | |
| 1992 | #425 | 593 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | #433 | 586 | — | |
| 1990 | #395 | 659 | #7,178 | 6 |
| 1989 | #332 | 761 | #5,165 | 9 |
| 1988 | #332 | 742 | #5,200 | 8 |
| 1987 | #418 | 532 | — | |
| 1986 | #453 | 476 | — | |
| 1985 | #427 | 515 | — | |
| 1984 | #344 | 665 | — | |
| 1983 | #512 | 375 | #6,238 | 5 |
| 1982 | #472 | 445 | — | |
| 1981 | #452 | 476 | — | |
| 1980 | #409 | 546 | — | |
| 1979 | #372 | 609 | #6,056 | 5 |
| 1978 | #353 | 610 | — | |
| 1977 | #303 | 790 | #4,582 | 7 |
| 1976 | #360 | 585 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | #1,291 | 86 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,239 | 88 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,312 | 77 | — | |
| 1972 | #1,280 | 80 | — | |
| 1971 | #1,322 | 81 | — | |
| 1970 | #1,452 | 70 | — | |
| 1969 | #1,338 | 72 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,418 | 63 | — | |
| 1967 | #1,659 | 47 | — | |
| 1966 | #1,548 | 52 | — | |
| 1965 | #1,421 | 60 | — | |
| 1964 | #1,559 | 53 | — | |
| 1963 | #1,623 | 49 | — | |
| 1962 | #1,558 | 52 | — | |
| 1961 | #1,921 | 36 | — | |
| 1960 | #1,542 | 52 | — | |
| 1959 | #2,054 | 30 | — | |
| 1958 | #1,606 | 44 | — | |
| 1957 | #1,808 | 36 | — | |
| 1956 | #1,506 | 50 | — | |
| 1955 | #1,733 | 36 | — | |
| 1954 | #1,444 | 48 | — | |
| 1953 | #1,834 | 30 | — | |
| 1952 | #1,746 | 32 | — | |
| 1951 | #1,842 | 28 | — | |
| 1950 | #2,121 | 21 | — | |
| 1949 | #1,845 | 27 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,188 | 20 | — | |
| 1947 | #2,637 | 15 | — | |
| 1946 | #2,597 | 14 | — | |
| 1945 | #2,237 | 15 | — | |
| 1944 | #2,287 | 15 | — | |
| 1943 | #2,151 | 17 | — | |
| 1942 | #2,416 | 14 | — | |
| 1941 | #2,532 | 12 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 | — | |
| 1939 | #2,417 | 12 | — | |
| 1938 | #2,447 | 12 | — | |
| 1937 | #2,317 | 13 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,689 | 10 | — | |
| 1935 | #3,431 | 7 | — | |
| 1934 | #1,697 | 20 | — | |
| 1933 | #1,723 | 20 | — | |
| 1932 | #1,877 | 18 | — | |
| 1931 | #1,421 | 27 | — | |
| 1930 | #1,499 | 27 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,301 | 14 | — | |
| 1928 | #2,381 | 14 | — | |
| 1927 | #1,935 | 20 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,474 | 14 | — | |
| 1925 | #1,647 | 26 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,661 | 13 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,264 | 16 | — | |
| 1922 | #2,387 | 15 | — | |
| 1921 | #3,164 | 10 | — | |
| 1920 | #3,340 | 9 | — | |
| 1919 | #2,384 | 14 | — | |
| 1918 | #3,024 | 10 | — | |
| 1917 | #2,204 | 15 | — | |
| 1916 | #1,581 | 23 | — | |
| 1915 | #2,143 | 14 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,876 | 7 | — | |
| 1913 | #2,164 | 9 | — | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | #2,463 | 5 | — | |
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1911
The first year at least five girls were named Nadia! It came in at #2,463, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1911–1912, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Nadia is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- Minnesota#250 · 1 in 976
- New Mexico#296 · 1 in 935
- Iowa#354 · 1 in 1,308
- Maryland#354 · 1 in 1,332
- New Jersey#362 · 1 in 1,614
Best ever in a state: #70 in Rhode Island, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | #250 | 22 | 1 in 976 |
| New Mexico | #296 | 5 | 1 in 935 |
| Iowa | #354 | 9 | 1 in 1,308 |
| Maryland | #354 | 15 | 1 in 1,332 |
| New Jersey | #362 | 22 | 1 in 1,614 |
| Wisconsin | #420 | 12 | 1 in 1,688 |
| Colorado | #428 | 13 | 1 in 1,794 |
| Virginia | #465 | 17 | 1 in 1,985 |
| North Carolina | #472 | 23 | 1 in 2,021 |
| New York | #473 | 36 | 1 in 2,176 |
| Arkansas | #489 | 6 | 1 in 1,766 |
| Illinois | #494 | 20 | 1 in 2,216 |
| Nevada | #508 | 5 | 1 in 1,840 |
| Pennsylvania | #515 | 20 | 1 in 2,334 |
| Indiana | #542 | 12 | 1 in 2,326 |
| Oklahoma | #546 | 7 | 1 in 2,111 |
| California | #556 | 58 | 1 in 2,788 |
| Arizona | #578 | 11 | 1 in 2,565 |
| Kansas | #578 | 5 | 1 in 2,362 |
| Texas | #581 | 54 | 1 in 2,973 |
| Michigan | #589 | 13 | 1 in 2,749 |
| Missouri | #589 | 9 | 1 in 2,700 |
| Florida | #598 | 29 | 1 in 2,992 |
| South Carolina | #614 | 7 | 1 in 2,613 |
| Washington | #617 | 10 | 1 in 2,886 |
| Oregon | #619 | 5 | 1 in 2,610 |
| Kentucky | #653 | 6 | 1 in 2,875 |
| Ohio | #668 | 14 | 1 in 3,377 |
| Alabama | #716 | 6 | 1 in 3,053 |
| Georgia | #748 | 13 | 1 in 3,478 |
| Louisiana | #776 | 5 | 1 in 3,274 |
| Massachusetts | #873 | 5 | 1 in 4,806 |
| Tennessee | #983 | 6 | 1 in 5,346 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Nadia
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 97 spots since 2020 (#468 → #565)
- Biggest jump: 931 spots in 1976
- Biggest drop: 83 spots in 1985
Rise & fade · girls
94 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1911
- Peaked 2005 at #178 (1,923 births)
- Births halved by 2015, 10 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 50 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 50 yrs · run 1976–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 961
- Highest: 1 in 961 girls born in 2005 were named Nadia (0.10%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,027 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 2000s
- 33.6% of all girls named Nadia (15,665) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 97 | #1,581 (1916) | #2,355 |
| 1920s | 151 | #1,647 (1925) | #2,455 |
| 1930s | 166 | #1,421 (1931) | #2,152 |
| 1940s | 157 | #1,845 (1949) | #2,410 |
| 1950s | 355 | #1,444 (1954) | #1,769 |
| 1960s | 536 | #1,338 (1969) | #1,559 |
| 1970s | 3,076 | #303 (1977) | #928 |
| 1980s | 5,533 | #332 (1989) | #415 |
| 1990s | 7,134 | #319 (1998) | #388 |
| 2000s | 15,665 | #178 (2005) | #216 |
| 2010s | 9,868 | #248 (2010) | #334 |
| 2020s | 3,818 | #437 (2022) | #489 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Nadia ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: