Natalie
#89 for girls in 2025, 2,736 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #9,894
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2008 · 10,201 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 50 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 379,062since 1880
Natalie over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #89 | 2,736 | — | |
| 2024 | #73 | 3,127 | #9,894 | 7 |
| 2023 | #63 | 3,429 | — | |
| 2022 | #55 | 3,947 | — | |
| 2021 | #56 | 4,060 | — | |
| 2020 | #51 | 4,291 | — | |
| 2019 | #41 | 4,810 | #12,145 | 5 |
| 2018 | #39 | 5,127 | — | |
| 2017 | #35 | 5,554 | #9,696 | 7 |
| 2016 | #31 | 6,191 | — | |
| 2015 | #27 | 6,510 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #23 | 7,115 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #21 | 7,492 | #8,789 | 8 |
| 2012 | #17 | 7,908 | — | |
| 2011 | #14 | 8,646 | #7,009 | 11 |
| 2010 | #14 | 8,789 | #9,693 | 7 |
| 2009 | #16 | 9,421 | #8,985 | 8 |
| 2008 | #13 | 10,201 | #4,901 | 19 |
| 2007 | #17 | 10,443 | #6,622 | 12 |
| 2006 | #17 | 10,951 | #4,675 | 19 |
| 2005 | #18 | 10,742 | #5,278 | 15 |
| 2004 | #19 | 9,689 | #3,074 | 32 |
| 2003 | #23 | 9,151 | #4,815 | 16 |
| 2002 | #30 | 8,352 | #5,725 | 12 |
| 2001 | #32 | 8,049 | #6,013 | 11 |
| 2000 | #34 | 8,096 | #8,209 | 7 |
| 1999 | #34 | 8,079 | #5,317 | 12 |
| 1998 | #40 | 7,549 | #7,560 | 7 |
| 1997 | #48 | 6,539 | #5,642 | 10 |
| 1996 | #46 | 6,693 | #4,185 | 15 |
| 1995 | #51 | 6,424 | #5,124 | 11 |
| 1994 | #56 | 5,837 | #4,290 | 14 |
| 1993 | #62 | 5,484 | #6,816 | 7 |
| 1992 | #61 | 5,583 | #3,459 | 18 |
| 1991 | #64 | 5,557 | #4,231 | 13 |
| 1990 | #63 | 5,637 | #2,488 | 27 |
| 1989 | #62 | 5,630 | #2,106 | 33 |
| 1988 | #63 | 5,483 | #2,860 | 19 |
| 1987 | #56 | 5,331 | #2,057 | 29 |
| 1986 | #52 | 5,707 | #2,510 | 21 |
| 1985 | #58 | 5,535 | #2,171 | 25 |
| 1984 | #55 | 5,555 | #1,979 | 27 |
| 1983 | #52 | 5,723 | #1,748 | 32 |
| 1982 | #51 | 5,961 | #2,207 | 23 |
| 1981 | #60 | 4,858 | #2,138 | 24 |
| 1980 | #65 | 4,645 | #2,831 | 16 |
| 1979 | #68 | 4,445 | #3,168 | 13 |
| 1978 | #66 | 4,165 | #2,205 | 21 |
| 1977 | #69 | 4,043 | #5,123 | 6 |
| 1976 | #80 | 3,499 | #2,417 | 18 |
| 1975 | #110 | 2,637 | #3,941 | 8 |
| 1974 | #119 | 2,466 | #3,837 | 8 |
| 1973 | #140 | 2,059 | #3,445 | 9 |
| 1972 | #143 | 2,024 | #3,622 | 8 |
| 1971 | #154 | 2,093 | — | |
| 1970 | #142 | 2,370 | #3,521 | 8 |
| 1969 | #153 | 2,152 | #3,314 | 8 |
| 1968 | #171 | 1,886 | #3,107 | 8 |
| 1967 | #161 | 2,034 | #3,559 | 6 |
| 1966 | #150 | 2,309 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | #180 | 1,940 | — | |
| 1964 | #177 | 2,127 | #3,050 | 8 |
| 1963 | #190 | 1,993 | — | |
| 1962 | #191 | 1,949 | — | |
| 1961 | #213 | 1,625 | — | |
| 1960 | #216 | 1,550 | #4,038 | 5 |
| 1959 | #247 | 1,232 | — | |
| 1958 | #238 | 1,283 | — | |
| 1957 | #267 | 1,055 | — | |
| 1956 | #353 | 612 | — | |
| 1955 | #446 | 404 | — | |
| 1954 | #439 | 401 | — | |
| 1953 | #446 | 374 | — | |
| 1952 | #429 | 402 | — | |
| 1951 | #408 | 414 | — | |
| 1950 | #405 | 390 | — | |
| 1949 | #388 | 413 | — | |
| 1948 | #372 | 450 | — | |
| 1947 | #382 | 434 | — | |
| 1946 | #385 | 389 | — | |
| 1945 | #364 | 366 | — | |
| 1944 | #355 | 380 | — | |
| 1943 | #325 | 467 | — | |
| 1942 | #320 | 468 | — | |
| 1941 | #342 | 368 | — | |
| 1940 | #319 | 394 | — | |
| 1939 | #305 | 410 | — | |
| 1938 | #311 | 402 | — | |
| 1937 | #313 | 391 | — | |
| 1936 | #288 | 445 | — | |
| 1935 | #286 | 457 | — | |
| 1934 | #269 | 530 | — | |
| 1933 | #269 | 517 | — | |
| 1932 | #260 | 579 | — | |
| 1931 | #247 | 599 | — | |
| 1930 | #248 | 624 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #248 | 634 | — | |
| 1928 | #238 | 687 | #3,357 | 7 |
| 1927 | #257 | 659 | #3,780 | 6 |
| 1926 | #255 | 669 | — | |
| 1925 | #249 | 708 | — | |
| 1924 | #249 | 713 | — | |
| 1923 | #247 | 694 | #3,467 | 7 |
| 1922 | #254 | 678 | #4,307 | 5 |
| 1921 | #247 | 729 | — | |
| 1920 | #278 | 548 | — | |
| 1919 | #279 | 520 | — | |
| 1918 | #297 | 465 | — | |
| 1917 | #280 | 484 | #3,545 | 6 |
| 1916 | #288 | 428 | — | |
| 1915 | #282 | 429 | — | |
| 1914 | #261 | 395 | — | |
| 1913 | #295 | 258 | — | |
| 1912 | #304 | 222 | — | |
| 1911 | #284 | 190 | — | |
| 1910 | #337 | 136 | — | |
| 1909 | #331 | 120 | — | |
| 1908 | #388 | 86 | — | |
| 1907 | #444 | 65 | — | |
| 1906 | #383 | 80 | — | |
| 1905 | #413 | 67 | — | |
| 1904 | #445 | 53 | — | |
| 1903 | #435 | 53 | — | |
| 1902 | #509 | 39 | — | |
| 1901 | #591 | 28 | — | |
| 1900 | #407 | 67 | — | |
| 1899 | #476 | 38 | — | |
| 1898 | #486 | 40 | — | |
| 1897 | #530 | 31 | — | |
| 1896 | #499 | 35 | — | |
| 1895 | #465 | 39 | — | |
| 1894 | #422 | 43 | — | |
| 1893 | #455 | 34 | — | |
| 1892 | #453 | 36 | — | |
| 1891 | #541 | 23 | — | |
| 1890 | #435 | 34 | — | |
| 1889 | #499 | 25 | — | |
| 1888 | #486 | 26 | — | |
| 1887 | #560 | 16 | — | |
| 1886 | #556 | 16 | — | |
| 1885 | #520 | 17 | — | |
| 1884 | #640 | 11 | — | |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | — | |
| 1882 | #475 | 15 | — | |
| 1881 | #491 | 12 | — | |
| 1880 | #836 | 5 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Natalie was already there! It came in at #836, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Natalie is popular in 1922
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- New Hampshire#83 · 1 in 288
- Massachusetts#93 · 1 in 407
- Rhode Island#97 · 1 in 410
- Vermont#117 · 1 in 447
- New York#121 · 1 in 599
Best ever in a state: #5 in California, 2004.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Hampshire | #83 | 12 | 1 in 288 |
| Massachusetts | #93 | 87 | 1 in 407 |
| Rhode Island | #97 | 14 | 1 in 410 |
| Vermont | #117 | 6 | 1 in 447 |
| New York | #121 | 165 | 1 in 599 |
| Connecticut | #126 | 21 | 1 in 611 |
| Maine | #127 | 14 | 1 in 489 |
| District of Columbia | #128 | 5 | 1 in 693 |
| New Jersey | #165 | 30 | 1 in 1,032 |
| Pennsylvania | #190 | 63 | 1 in 1,514 |
| California | #202 | 25 | 1 in 1,237 |
| Illinois | #208 | 35 | 1 in 1,668 |
| Michigan | #211 | 23 | 1 in 1,609 |
| Ohio | #230 | 28 | 1 in 1,948 |
| Washington | #245 | 5 | 1 in 1,968 |
| Missouri | #274 | 15 | 1 in 2,039 |
| Wisconsin | #288 | 8 | 1 in 3,077 |
| Minnesota | #314 | 7 | 1 in 3,310 |
| Indiana | #331 | 7 | 1 in 3,762 |
| Louisiana | #343 | 10 | 1 in 2,368 |
| Virginia | #354 | 7 | 1 in 4,122 |
| West Virginia | #363 | 6 | 1 in 3,305 |
| Mississippi | #421 | 6 | 1 in 3,765 |
| Alabama | #426 | 7 | 1 in 4,478 |
| Tennessee | #439 | 6 | 1 in 4,700 |
| Oklahoma | #501 | 5 | 1 in 5,009 |
| Georgia | #504 | 6 | 1 in 6,228 |
| Texas | #581 | 12 | 1 in 4,913 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Natalie
- 16 spots since 2024 (#73 → #89)
- 38 spots since 2020 (#51 → #89)
- 62 spots since 2015 (#27 → #89)
- Biggest jump: 345 spots in 1881 (#836 → #491)
- Biggest drop: 184 spots in 1901 (#407 → #591)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 2008 at #13 (10,201 births)
- Births halved by 2019, 11 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 50 yrs · run 1976–2025
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
- Highest: 1 in 172 girls born in 2005 were named Natalie (0.58%)
- Latest: 1 in 587 girls born in 2025 (0.17%)
- Its best rank, #13 in 2008, was only 1 in 185 (0.54%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 25.1% of all girls named Natalie (95,095) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 152 | #475 (1882) | #571 |
| 1890s | 353 | #422 (1894) | #476 |
| 1900s | 658 | #331 (1909) | #435 |
| 1910s | 3,527 | #261 (1914) | #291 |
| 1920s | 6,719 | #238 (1928) | #252 |
| 1930s | 4,954 | #247 (1931) | #280 |
| 1940s | 4,129 | #319 (1940) | #355 |
| 1950s | 6,567 | #238 (1958) | #368 |
| 1960s | 19,565 | #150 (1966) | #180 |
| 1970s | 29,801 | #66 (1978) | #109 |
| 1980s | 54,428 | #51 (1982) | #57 |
| 1990s | 63,382 | #34 (1999) | #53 |
| 2000s | 95,095 | #13 (2008) | #22 |
| 2010s | 68,142 | #14 (2010) | #26 |
| 2020s | 21,590 | #51 (2020) | #65 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Natalie in 1922
Top girls' names in 1922
Top boys' names in 1922
More about 1922
girls
1,201,003 girls got a published name in 1922; 1 in 1,771 of them was named Natalie, which outranked 95.6% of the 5,789 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
1,088,154 boys got a published name in 1922; 1 in 217,631 of them was named Natalie, which outranked 13.3% of the 4,967 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 32.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Tied with 660 names at #4,307; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.