Nathan

#14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births · #63 for boys in 2025, 4,975 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
2004 · 14,634 births
Debut · boys
114 births
In top 100 · boys
54 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
587,497
since 1880

Nathan over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201933peak #20, 2004boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#14,9425#634,975
2024#11,1228#625,029
2023—#595,073
2022#13,5926#575,544
2021#13,4646#595,432
2020—#555,702
2019—#556,090
2018#9,80610#486,850
2017#11,6158#457,442
2016#14,3316#438,000
2015#10,8669#388,600
2014#10,9559#388,997
2013#11,0009#319,721
2012#7,45616#2910,431
2011#9,72311#2810,523
2010#11,2469#2711,380
2009#7,34117#2512,135
2008#8,52914#2113,262
2007#7,09218#2413,605
2006#5,90622#2314,278
2005#4,26732#2014,365
2004#2,65262#2014,634
2003#4,80426#2613,667
2002#4,28029#2813,224
2001#6,06718#3112,647
2000#6,80815#3013,040
1999#5,42419#3212,538
1998#9,2609#3411,586
1997#6,16315#3410,442
1996#4,30624#3710,287
1995#5,01919#3910,306
1994#3,30234#4010,386
1993#3,87727#4110,199
1992#4,84920#4410,154
1991#3,72228#4210,500
1990#4,00325#4410,934
1989#2,61843#4310,904
1988#2,44744#4410,154
1987#1,86062#459,910
1986#1,80263#439,996
1985#1,42489#4010,653
1984#1,55073#3810,614
1983#1,37986#4010,557
1982#1,65369#3610,805
1981#1,66369#3611,256
1980#1,55275#3611,138
1979#1,73163#3710,719
1978#1,76558#369,890
1977#2,06346#369,886
1976#1,99644#398,611
1975#2,23237#457,069
1974#2,61628#525,844
1973#2,83024#634,734
1972#2,74725#793,512
1971#3,50818#1043,047
1970#4,49212#1302,545
1969#4,19812#1541,908
1968#3,78913#1631,654
1967#5,4577#1801,432
1966—#1791,422
1965#4,8318#1811,417
1964—#1881,500
1963#6,5925#1941,540
1962—#1981,532
1961#4,8828#1991,489
1960#5,1687#1901,630
1959#4,3009#2071,378
1958#3,74711#2141,237
1957#6,0865#2151,225
1956—#2221,099
1955#5,2086#232950
1954—#225959
1953—#237806
1952—#229851
1951—#222870
1950—#243751
1949—#251660
1948—#263620
1947—#273617
1946—#271557
1945—#267488
1944—#262507
1943#4,6915#244581
1942—#253523
1941—#243527
1940—#243497
1939#3,4297#246468
1938—#232515
1937—#258434
1936—#243464
1935—#248468
1934—#245469
1933—#259413
1932—#243486
1931#3,4977#258442
1930#4,0476#234540
1929#3,1379#239513
1928—#235548
1927#3,8757#210636
1926—#206669
1925#4,9735#219615
1924—#204680
1923—#187739
1922#5,0095#185749
1921#4,0237#186751
1920—#172815
1919—#156849
1918—#150945
1917#4,0836#148881
1916—#143904
1915#3,7956#139916
1914—#124848
1913—#127615
1912—#120581
1911—#108348
1910—#135245
1909—#128209
1908—#137178
1907—#136176
1906—#139148
1905—#130168
1904—#148131
1903—#128146
1902—#135143
1901—#127131
1900—#125186
1899—#141112
1898—#16699
1897—#119139
1896—#150110
1895—#136119
1894—#125127
1893—#131114
1892—#118144
1891—#130106
1890—#130110
1889—#116121
1888—#123129
1887—#124106
1886—#114136
1885—#132103
1884—#140100
1883—#13293
1882—#124113
1881—#13691
1880—#115114
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Nathan was already there! It came in at #115, and was given to 114 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1891, when fewer than 140 boys a year got the name.

Where Nathan is popular in 1933

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedMNIllinois: #323 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 4,942 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedWIMichigan: #280 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 3,561 boysMINew York: #173 for boys · 47 births · 1 in 1,776 boysNYMassachusetts: #256 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 5,553 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedSDIowa: #267 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,016 boysIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedINOhio: #257 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 3,591 boysOHPennsylvania: #270 for boys · 17 births · 1 in 4,065 boysPANew Jersey: #220 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,503 boysNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #386 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 4,857 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedNEMissouri: #272 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 2,969 boysMOKentucky: #254 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 2,247 boysKYWest Virginia: #167 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 1,058 boysWVVirginia: #246 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 2,132 boysVAMaryland: #156 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,576 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedNMKansas: #223 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 1,891 boysKSArkansas: #225 for boys · 11 births · 1 in 1,571 boysARTennessee: #192 for boys · 16 births · 1 in 1,513 boysTNNorth Carolina: #193 for boys · 26 births · 1 in 1,265 boysNCSouth Carolina: #152 for boys · 19 births · 1 in 947 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #292 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 2,734 boysOKLouisiana: #159 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 798 boysLAMississippi: #167 for boys · 19 births · 1 in 986 boysMSAlabama: #154 for boys · 26 births · 1 in 985 boysALGeorgia: #171 for boys · 22 births · 1 in 1,227 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Nathan, so not publishedHITexas: #329 for boys · 23 births · 1 in 2,328 boysTXFlorida: #151 for boys · 12 births · 1 in 915 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Florida#151 · 1 in 915
  2. South Carolina#152 · 1 in 947
  3. Alabama#154 · 1 in 985
  4. Maryland#156 · 1 in 1,576
  5. Louisiana#159 · 1 in 798

Best ever in a state: #7 in Utah, 1995.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Florida#151121 in 915
South Carolina#152191 in 947
Alabama#154261 in 985
Maryland#15671 in 1,576
Louisiana#159221 in 798
Mississippi#167191 in 986
West Virginia#167151 in 1,058
Georgia#171221 in 1,227
New York#173471 in 1,776
Tennessee#192161 in 1,513
North Carolina#193261 in 1,265
New Jersey#22071 in 3,503
Kansas#22371 in 1,891
Arkansas#225111 in 1,571
Virginia#246101 in 2,132
Kentucky#254111 in 2,247
Massachusetts#25651 in 5,553
Ohio#257121 in 3,591
Iowa#26761 in 3,016
Pennsylvania#270171 in 4,065
Missouri#27291 in 2,969
Michigan#280101 in 3,561
Oklahoma#29281 in 2,734
Illinois#323101 in 4,942
Texas#329231 in 2,328
California#38671 in 4,857
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Maine———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Nathan
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 1 spot since 2024 (#62 → #63)
  • 8 spots since 2020 (#55 → #63)
  • 25 spots since 2015 (#38 → #63)
  • Biggest jump: 31 spots in 1897 (#150 → #119)
  • Biggest drop: 47 spots in 1898 (#119 → #166)
Rise & fade · boys
124 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2004 at #20 (14,634 births)
  • Births halved by 2018, 14 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 54 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 54 yrs · run 1972–2025
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 136
  • Highest: 1 in 136 boys born in 2004 were named Nathan (0.74%)
  • Latest: 1 in 343 boys born in 2025 (0.29%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
  • 23.0% of all boys named Nathan (134,857) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s1,106#114 (1886)#126
1890s1,180#118 (1892)#135
1900s1,616#125 (1900)#133
1910s7,132#108 (1911)#135
1920s6,715#172 (1920)#204
1930s4,699#232 (1938)#247
1940s5,577#243 (1941)#257
1950s10,126#207 (1959)#225
1960s15,524#154 (1969)#183
1970s65,857#36 (1978)#62
1980s105,987#36 (1981)#40
1990s107,332#32 (1999)#39
2000s134,857#20 (2004)#25
2010s88,034#27 (2010)#38
2020s31,755#55 (2020)#59

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Nathan in 1933

boys
#259
413 births · 1 in 2,401 boys

Top boys' names in 1933

  1. #1Robert54,221
  2. #2James51,112
  3. #3John46,224
  4. #4William39,049
  5. #5Richard31,331
  6. #6Charles28,991
  7. #7Donald28,450
  8. #8George18,356
  9. #9Joseph17,162
  10. #10Thomas16,508
  11. #259Nathan413
More about 1933

boys

991,524 boys got a published name in 1933; 1 in 2,401 of them was named Nathan, which outranked 93.8% of the 4,156 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.4% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Nathan
  1. #256Norbert425
  2. #257Mack419
  3. #258Ross414
  4. #259Nathan413
  5. #260Irving408
  6. #261Bert407
  7. #261Felix407
Biggest movers since 1932
Risers
  1. ↑ 553Neville#1,548 → #995
  2. ↑ 401Cordell#1,286 → #885
  3. ↑ 381Hamilton#1,286 → #905
  4. ↑ 375Delano#677 → #302
  5. ↑ 313Jan#937 → #624
Fallers
  1. ↓ 568Hoover#793 → #1,361
  2. ↓ 541Porfirio#915 → #1,456
  3. ↓ 424Rosendo#937 → #1,361
  4. ↓ 381Alfonzo#821 → #1,202
  5. ↓ 368Hillard#862 → #1,230

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1933 →