Neal
Last seen for girls in 1986 at #10,912 · #1,906 for boys in 2025, 82 births
Given to boys 99.5% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1952 · 1,143 births
- Debut · boys
- 43 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 55,048since 1880
Neal over time
Rank among boys' names. Neal has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,906 | 82 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,997 | 77 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,735 | 95 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,597 | 110 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,577 | 110 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,568 | 104 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,468 | 118 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,606 | 102 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,348 | 132 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,229 | 152 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,210 | 152 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,402 | 120 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,568 | 99 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,523 | 105 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,587 | 97 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,447 | 114 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,472 | 113 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,467 | 112 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,405 | 116 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,202 | 139 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,209 | 131 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,316 | 112 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,159 | 129 | |
| 2002 | — | #948 | 169 | |
| 2001 | — | #908 | 172 | |
| 2000 | — | #885 | 178 | |
| 1999 | — | #819 | 186 | |
| 1998 | — | #759 | 210 | |
| 1997 | — | #665 | 246 | |
| 1996 | — | #640 | 262 | |
| 1995 | — | #649 | 258 | |
| 1994 | — | #611 | 294 | |
| 1993 | — | #520 | 384 | |
| 1992 | — | #508 | 396 | |
| 1991 | — | #470 | 444 | |
| 1990 | — | #460 | 463 | |
| 1989 | — | #408 | 522 | |
| 1988 | — | #421 | 460 | |
| 1987 | — | #408 | 456 | |
| 1986 | #10,912 | 5 | #348 | 543 |
| 1985 | — | #339 | 562 | |
| 1984 | — | #332 | 566 | |
| 1983 | #10,275 | 5 | #329 | 573 |
| 1982 | — | #338 | 556 | |
| 1981 | — | #320 | 596 | |
| 1980 | — | #323 | 592 | |
| 1979 | #9,010 | 6 | #306 | 637 |
| 1978 | — | #307 | 583 | |
| 1977 | — | #309 | 622 | |
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | #323 | 550 |
| 1975 | — | #293 | 648 | |
| 1974 | #6,900 | 7 | #313 | 582 |
| 1973 | — | #323 | 537 | |
| 1972 | — | #333 | 534 | |
| 1971 | — | #315 | 600 | |
| 1970 | — | #289 | 718 | |
| 1969 | — | #281 | 703 | |
| 1968 | — | #290 | 651 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #268 | 741 |
| 1966 | — | #254 | 815 | |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | #250 | 884 |
| 1964 | — | #223 | 1,128 | |
| 1963 | #6,592 | 5 | #227 | 1,094 |
| 1962 | — | #241 | 1,031 | |
| 1961 | — | #237 | 1,122 | |
| 1960 | — | #233 | 1,192 | |
| 1959 | — | #222 | 1,222 | |
| 1958 | — | #227 | 1,157 | |
| 1957 | — | #218 | 1,192 | |
| 1956 | — | #220 | 1,102 | |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | #220 | 1,060 |
| 1954 | — | #212 | 1,088 | |
| 1953 | — | #216 | 967 | |
| 1952 | — | #198 | 1,143 | |
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | #208 | 956 |
| 1950 | #5,301 | 5 | #217 | 848 |
| 1949 | — | #239 | 740 | |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #242 | 713 |
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | #243 | 730 |
| 1946 | — | #232 | 676 | |
| 1945 | #3,676 | 7 | #232 | 578 |
| 1944 | — | #236 | 568 | |
| 1943 | — | #263 | 535 | |
| 1942 | — | #236 | 569 | |
| 1941 | — | #233 | 543 | |
| 1940 | — | #239 | 506 | |
| 1939 | — | #256 | 444 | |
| 1938 | — | #258 | 446 | |
| 1937 | #4,255 | 5 | #261 | 430 |
| 1936 | #3,376 | 7 | #265 | 419 |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #265 | 415 |
| 1934 | — | #257 | 440 | |
| 1933 | #4,218 | 5 | #277 | 362 |
| 1932 | #3,274 | 8 | #283 | 374 |
| 1931 | #3,848 | 6 | #286 | 372 |
| 1930 | — | #292 | 381 | |
| 1929 | #3,137 | 9 | #301 | 342 |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #291 | 377 |
| 1927 | #3,875 | 7 | #291 | 384 |
| 1926 | #4,306 | 6 | #279 | 417 |
| 1925 | #2,939 | 11 | #282 | 420 |
| 1924 | #4,434 | 6 | #284 | 405 |
| 1923 | — | #279 | 410 | |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | #281 | 388 |
| 1921 | #3,400 | 9 | #314 | 344 |
| 1920 | #4,398 | 6 | #293 | 371 |
| 1919 | #4,814 | 5 | #328 | 294 |
| 1918 | #4,291 | 6 | #336 | 287 |
| 1917 | #2,879 | 10 | #327 | 277 |
| 1916 | #3,552 | 7 | #308 | 283 |
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | #355 | 228 |
| 1914 | #3,618 | 5 | #352 | 176 |
| 1913 | — | #345 | 143 | |
| 1912 | #1,620 | 12 | #336 | 127 |
| 1911 | — | #344 | 63 | |
| 1910 | #2,398 | 5 | #304 | 65 |
| 1909 | — | #334 | 48 | |
| 1908 | #1,862 | 6 | #330 | 46 |
| 1907 | — | #307 | 48 | |
| 1906 | #1,951 | 5 | #316 | 43 |
| 1905 | — | #299 | 45 | |
| 1904 | — | #288 | 44 | |
| 1903 | — | #263 | 49 | |
| 1902 | — | #277 | 46 | |
| 1901 | #1,679 | 5 | #334 | 29 |
| 1900 | — | #269 | 58 | |
| 1899 | — | #306 | 33 | |
| 1898 | — | #288 | 40 | |
| 1897 | — | #272 | 43 | |
| 1896 | — | #315 | 35 | |
| 1895 | — | #289 | 38 | |
| 1894 | — | #275 | 41 | |
| 1893 | — | #300 | 33 | |
| 1892 | — | #312 | 35 | |
| 1891 | — | #273 | 35 | |
| 1890 | — | #272 | 40 | |
| 1889 | — | #271 | 38 | |
| 1888 | — | #289 | 37 | |
| 1887 | — | #268 | 37 | |
| 1886 | — | #267 | 40 | |
| 1885 | — | #290 | 33 | |
| 1884 | — | #288 | 36 | |
| 1883 | — | #306 | 29 | |
| 1882 | — | #288 | 35 | |
| 1881 | — | #273 | 33 | |
| 1880 | — | #252 | 43 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Neal was already there! It came in at #252, and was given to 43 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1899, when fewer than 44 boys a year got the name.
Where Neal is popular in 1967
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Hawaii#113 · 1 in 464
- Massachusetts#119 · 1 in 1,208
- Rhode Island#131 · 1 in 1,262
- Wisconsin#155 · 1 in 1,341
- Maine#158 · 1 in 1,160
Best ever in a state: #81 in Hawaii, 1956.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawaii | #113 | 13 | 1 in 464 |
| Massachusetts | #119 | 39 | 1 in 1,208 |
| Rhode Island | #131 | 6 | 1 in 1,262 |
| Wisconsin | #155 | 27 | 1 in 1,341 |
| Maine | #158 | 7 | 1 in 1,160 |
| Minnesota | #174 | 18 | 1 in 1,706 |
| Nebraska | #174 | 8 | 1 in 1,391 |
| Oregon | #180 | 13 | 1 in 1,137 |
| Pennsylvania | #197 | 42 | 1 in 2,194 |
| Kentucky | #206 | 17 | 1 in 1,591 |
| Iowa | #207 | 12 | 1 in 1,889 |
| Alabama | #217 | 20 | 1 in 1,467 |
| Oklahoma | #229 | 11 | 1 in 1,627 |
| Virginia | #229 | 20 | 1 in 1,815 |
| Ohio | #231 | 37 | 1 in 2,430 |
| Indiana | #234 | 20 | 1 in 2,250 |
| District of Columbia | #236 | 7 | 1 in 1,751 |
| Missouri | #236 | 18 | 1 in 2,033 |
| New York | #242 | 64 | 1 in 2,352 |
| Louisiana | #244 | 22 | 1 in 1,570 |
| Maryland | #248 | 11 | 1 in 2,620 |
| Connecticut | #250 | 8 | 1 in 2,870 |
| Florida | #261 | 24 | 1 in 1,940 |
| Utah | #264 | 5 | 1 in 2,079 |
| Colorado | #267 | 8 | 1 in 2,175 |
| North Carolina | #267 | 20 | 1 in 2,150 |
| Kansas | #285 | 6 | 1 in 2,582 |
| Illinois | #288 | 32 | 1 in 2,893 |
| Arizona | #293 | 7 | 1 in 2,061 |
| Michigan | #293 | 21 | 1 in 3,704 |
| Georgia | #295 | 16 | 1 in 2,552 |
| Mississippi | #312 | 8 | 1 in 2,575 |
| Washington | #318 | 7 | 1 in 3,651 |
| South Carolina | #319 | 8 | 1 in 2,829 |
| Tennessee | #321 | 9 | 1 in 3,639 |
| California | #328 | 55 | 1 in 3,016 |
| Texas | #345 | 39 | 1 in 2,566 |
| New Jersey | #355 | 10 | 1 in 5,396 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Neal
- 91 spots since 2024 (#1,997 → #1,906)
- 338 spots since 2020 (#1,568 → #1,906)
- 696 spots since 2015 (#1,210 → #1,906)
- Biggest jump: 57 spots in 1902 (#334 → #277)
- Biggest drop: 211 spots in 2003 (#948 → #1,159)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1952 at #198 (1,143 births)
- Births halved by 1972, 20 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 123 yrs · run 1880–2002
- Highest: 1 in 1,700 boys born in 1952 were named Neal (0.06%)
- Latest: 1 in 20,830 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 19.5% of all boys named Neal (10,735) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 361 | #252 (1880) | #279 |
| 1890s | 373 | #272 (1897) | #290 |
| 1900s | 456 | #263 (1903) | #302 |
| 1910s | 1,943 | #304 (1910) | #334 |
| 1920s | 3,858 | #279 (1926) | #290 |
| 1930s | 4,083 | #256 (1939) | #270 |
| 1940s | 6,158 | #232 (1946) | #240 |
| 1950s | 10,735 | #198 (1952) | #216 |
| 1960s | 9,361 | #223 (1964) | #250 |
| 1970s | 6,011 | #289 (1970) | #311 |
| 1980s | 5,426 | #320 (1981) | #357 |
| 1990s | 3,143 | #460 (1990) | #610 |
| 2000s | 1,371 | #885 (2000) | #1,197 |
| 2010s | 1,191 | #1,210 (2015) | #1,439 |
| 2020s | 578 | #1,568 (2020) | #1,730 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Neal in 1967
Top girls' names in 1967
Top boys' names in 1967
More about 1967
girls
1,651,025 girls got a published name in 1967; 1 in 275,171 of them was named Neal, which outranked 23.1% of the 7,852 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.8% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,743,811 boys got a published name in 1967; 1 in 2,353 of them was named Neal, which outranked 94.1% of the 4,551 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 28.3% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.