Nealie
Last seen for girls in 2020 at #15,088 · Last seen for boys in 1920 at #4,286
Given to girls 97.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 1883 · 9 births
- Debut · girls
- 6 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 776since 1880
Nealie over time
Rank among girls' names. Nealie has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | #15,088 | 5 | — | |
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | #14,582 | 6 | — | |
| 2012 | #16,869 | 5 | — | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #17,294 | 5 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | #13,595 | 6 | — | |
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | #13,154 | 6 | — | |
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | #8,778 | 7 | — | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | #8,047 | 7 | — | |
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | #9,284 | 5 | — | |
| 1975 | #7,984 | 6 | — | |
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | #7,070 | 6 | — | |
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | #7,016 | 5 | — | |
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #5,273 | 7 | — | |
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | — | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | — | |
| 1957 | #5,377 | 6 | — | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | #5,563 | 5 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | #3,883 | 8 | — | |
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | — | |
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | #4,420 | 5 | — | |
| 1940 | #3,208 | 8 | — | |
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | #3,181 | 8 | — | |
| 1937 | #3,434 | 7 | — | |
| 1936 | #2,689 | 10 | — | |
| 1935 | #2,731 | 10 | — | |
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | #2,644 | 11 | — | |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | — | |
| 1930 | #2,425 | 13 | — | |
| 1929 | #2,437 | 13 | — | |
| 1928 | #3,436 | 8 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,339 | 15 | — | |
| 1926 | #2,872 | 11 | — | |
| 1925 | #2,191 | 17 | — | |
| 1924 | #2,212 | 17 | — | |
| 1923 | #2,366 | 15 | — | |
| 1922 | #3,152 | 10 | — | |
| 1921 | #2,195 | 17 | — | |
| 1920 | #2,263 | 16 | #4,286 | 5 |
| 1919 | #1,989 | 18 | — | |
| 1918 | #2,519 | 13 | #3,368 | 7 |
| 1917 | #2,100 | 16 | #3,981 | 5 |
| 1916 | #1,630 | 22 | — | |
| 1915 | #1,800 | 18 | — | |
| 1914 | #1,665 | 16 | — | |
| 1913 | #1,670 | 13 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,352 | 16 | — | |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,521 | 10 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,152 | 13 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,004 | 16 | — | |
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,229 | 10 | — | |
| 1905 | #1,093 | 12 | — | |
| 1904 | #1,001 | 13 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,440 | 7 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | — | |
| 1901 | #1,227 | 8 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,053 | 13 | — | |
| 1899 | #935 | 12 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,263 | 8 | — | |
| 1897 | #982 | 11 | — | |
| 1896 | #950 | 12 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,123 | 9 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,061 | 9 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,175 | 7 | — | |
| 1892 | #908 | 11 | — | |
| 1891 | #839 | 11 | — | |
| 1890 | #693 | 15 | — | |
| 1889 | #757 | 12 | — | |
| 1888 | #793 | 11 | — | |
| 1887 | #1,036 | 6 | — | |
| 1886 | #731 | 10 | — | |
| 1885 | #745 | 9 | — | |
| 1884 | #793 | 8 | — | |
| 1883 | #651 | 9 | — | |
| 1882 | #908 | 5 | — | |
| 1881 | #830 | 5 | — | |
| 1880 | #738 | 6 | — | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Nealie was already there! It came in at #738, and was given to 6 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1933–1934, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Nealie is popular in 1883
The SSA only publishes names by state from 1910 on.
See more about Nealie
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2020
- Biggest jump: 328 spots in 1899 (#1,263 → #935)
- Biggest drop: 305 spots in 1887 (#731 → #1,036)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1883 at #651 (9 births)
- Births halved by 1933, 50 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 15 yrs · run 1880–1886
- Highest: 1 in 12,480 girls born in 1883 were named Nealie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 323,310 girls born in 2020 (0.00%)
- 19.8% of all girls named Nealie (154) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 81 | #651 (1883) | #798 |
| 1890s | 105 | #693 (1890) | #993 |
| 1900s | 109 | #1,001 (1904) | #1,210 |
| 1910s | 154 | #1,352 (1912) | #1,762 |
| 1920s | 139 | #2,191 (1925) | #2,546 |
| 1930s | 64 | #2,425 (1930) | #3,062 |
| 1940s | 26 | #3,208 (1940) | #4,051 |
| 1950s | 16 | #5,377 (1957) | #5,681 |
| 1960s | 18 | #5,273 (1966) | #6,050 |
| 1970s | 17 | #7,070 (1970) | #8,113 |
| 1980s | 14 | #8,047 (1983) | #8,413 |
| 1990s | 0 | — | — |
| 2000s | 17 | #13,154 (2000) | #14,681 |
| 2010s | 11 | #14,582 (2013) | #15,726 |
| 2020s | 5 | #15,088 (2020) | #15,088 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Nealie in 1883
Top girls' names in 1883
More about 1883
girls
112,320 girls got a published name in 1883; 1 in 12,480 of them was named Nealie, which outranked 38.2% of the 1,054 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.4% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).