Nigel
Last seen for girls in 1994 at #10,569 · #2,077 for boys in 2025, 71 births
Given to boys 99.3% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1994 · 448 births
- Debut · boys
- 6 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 12,286since 1929
Nigel over time
Rank among boys' names. Nigel has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #2,077 | 71 | |
| 2024 | — | #2,190 | 66 | |
| 2023 | — | #2,047 | 73 | |
| 2022 | — | #2,094 | 71 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,721 | 94 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,849 | 80 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,548 | 108 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,401 | 125 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,219 | 150 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,254 | 146 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,111 | 173 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,188 | 155 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,090 | 170 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,065 | 178 | |
| 2011 | — | #998 | 194 | |
| 2010 | — | #933 | 216 | |
| 2009 | — | #856 | 249 | |
| 2008 | — | #809 | 271 | |
| 2007 | — | #742 | 303 | |
| 2006 | — | #707 | 309 | |
| 2005 | — | #733 | 276 | |
| 2004 | — | #766 | 237 | |
| 2003 | — | #706 | 266 | |
| 2002 | — | #667 | 280 | |
| 2001 | — | #622 | 305 | |
| 2000 | — | #577 | 349 | |
| 1999 | — | #555 | 361 | |
| 1998 | — | #537 | 373 | |
| 1997 | — | #534 | 372 | |
| 1996 | — | #523 | 383 | |
| 1995 | — | #507 | 405 | |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #477 | 448 |
| 1993 | — | #487 | 432 | |
| 1992 | #10,479 | 7 | #519 | 384 |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #567 | 318 |
| 1990 | — | #570 | 315 | |
| 1989 | #12,362 | 5 | #578 | 286 |
| 1988 | — | #611 | 240 | |
| 1987 | — | #635 | 208 | |
| 1986 | — | #621 | 208 | |
| 1985 | #9,307 | 6 | #632 | 194 |
| 1984 | — | #703 | 154 | |
| 1983 | — | #673 | 161 | |
| 1982 | — | #720 | 145 | |
| 1981 | — | #616 | 191 | |
| 1980 | — | #675 | 165 | |
| 1979 | — | #718 | 145 | |
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | #778 | 117 |
| 1977 | #5,532 | 11 | #705 | 146 |
| 1976 | — | #748 | 123 | |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #719 | 132 |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #847 | 90 |
| 1973 | #8,423 | 5 | #810 | 95 |
| 1972 | — | #851 | 89 | |
| 1971 | — | #828 | 95 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,093 | 56 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,042 | 55 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,131 | 44 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,117 | 44 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,613 | 23 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,483 | 27 | |
| 1964 | — | #1,487 | 28 | |
| 1963 | — | #1,695 | 22 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,546 | 26 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,570 | 26 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,728 | 22 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,709 | 22 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,593 | 24 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,457 | 29 | |
| 1956 | — | #2,091 | 15 | |
| 1955 | — | #1,503 | 26 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,706 | 20 | |
| 1953 | — | #2,531 | 10 | |
| 1952 | — | #2,376 | 11 | |
| 1951 | — | #3,714 | 5 | |
| 1950 | — | #2,580 | 9 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | #2,608 | 9 | |
| 1947 | — | #3,096 | 7 | |
| 1946 | — | #3,173 | 6 | |
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | #2,872 | 7 | |
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | #3,549 | 5 | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | #2,973 | 7 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | #3,559 | 6 | |
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | #4,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | #4,291 | 6 | — | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | #4,274 | 5 | — | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Nigel! It came in at #3,559, and was given to 6 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1930–1933, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Nigel is popular in 2007
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Carolina#254 · 1 in 1,351
- Georgia#392 · 1 in 2,337
- Maryland#434 · 1 in 2,737
- North Carolina#466 · 1 in 3,121
- Michigan#543 · 1 in 4,109
Best ever in a state: #153 in District of Columbia, 1998.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Carolina | #254 | 17 | 1 in 1,351 |
| Georgia | #392 | 27 | 1 in 2,337 |
| Maryland | #434 | 11 | 1 in 2,737 |
| North Carolina | #466 | 18 | 1 in 3,121 |
| Michigan | #543 | 13 | 1 in 4,109 |
| Pennsylvania | #543 | 15 | 1 in 4,311 |
| Virginia | #546 | 11 | 1 in 4,028 |
| New York | #564 | 26 | 1 in 4,260 |
| Wisconsin | #570 | 7 | 1 in 4,268 |
| Louisiana | #574 | 8 | 1 in 3,239 |
| Mississippi | #579 | 5 | 1 in 3,291 |
| Indiana | #640 | 8 | 1 in 4,897 |
| New Jersey | #645 | 9 | 1 in 5,205 |
| Tennessee | #660 | 7 | 1 in 5,518 |
| Washington | #699 | 7 | 1 in 5,306 |
| Ohio | #720 | 10 | 1 in 6,576 |
| Florida | #729 | 17 | 1 in 6,128 |
| Illinois | #874 | 10 | 1 in 7,726 |
| California | #991 | 21 | 1 in 12,451 |
| Texas | #1,257 | 12 | 1 in 15,863 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Nigel
- 113 spots since 2024 (#2,190 → #2,077)
- 228 spots since 2020 (#1,849 → #2,077)
- 966 spots since 2015 (#1,111 → #2,077)
- Biggest jump: 265 spots in 1971 (#1,093 → #828)
- Biggest drop: 104 spots in 1982 (#616 → #720)
- Debuted 1929
- Peaked 1994 at #477 (448 births)
- Births halved by 2010, 16 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 41 yrs · run 1971–2011
- Highest: 1 in 4,313 boys born in 1994 were named Nigel (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 24,057 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 30.9% of all boys named Nigel (3,791) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 6 | #3,559 (1929) | #3,559 |
| 1930s | 12 | #2,973 (1934) | #3,261 |
| 1940s | 34 | #2,608 (1948) | #3,088 |
| 1950s | 171 | #1,457 (1957) | #2,126 |
| 1960s | 317 | #1,042 (1969) | #1,441 |
| 1970s | 1,088 | #705 (1977) | #810 |
| 1980s | 1,952 | #578 (1989) | #646 |
| 1990s | 3,791 | #477 (1994) | #528 |
| 2000s | 2,845 | #577 (2000) | #719 |
| 2010s | 1,615 | #933 (2010) | #1,181 |
| 2020s | 455 | #1,721 (2021) | #1,996 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Nigel in 2007
Top boys' names in 2007
More about 2007
boys
2,075,414 boys got a published name in 2007; 1 in 6,850 of them was named Nigel, which outranked 94.8% of the 14,394 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.