Norman
Last seen for girls in 1988 at #8,391 · #1,196 for boys in 2025, 169 births
Given to boys 99.4% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1931 · 5,426 births
- Debut · boys
- 102 births
- In top 100 · boys
- 63 yrsof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 253,160since 1880
Norman over time
Rank among boys' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,196 | 169 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,308 | 149 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,360 | 138 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,191 | 168 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,165 | 170 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,127 | 174 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,193 | 160 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,202 | 156 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,116 | 172 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,077 | 183 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,231 | 148 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,097 | 174 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,135 | 160 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,145 | 160 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,309 | 130 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,209 | 147 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,125 | 164 | |
| 2008 | — | #995 | 196 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,005 | 192 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,008 | 182 | |
| 2005 | — | #906 | 197 | |
| 2004 | — | #842 | 211 | |
| 2003 | — | #791 | 220 | |
| 2002 | — | #810 | 210 | |
| 2001 | — | #756 | 228 | |
| 2000 | — | #663 | 271 | |
| 1999 | — | #698 | 240 | |
| 1998 | — | #645 | 271 | |
| 1997 | — | #599 | 295 | |
| 1996 | — | #637 | 264 | |
| 1995 | — | #615 | 279 | |
| 1994 | — | #566 | 328 | |
| 1993 | — | #517 | 393 | |
| 1992 | — | #500 | 405 | |
| 1991 | — | #429 | 520 | |
| 1990 | — | #469 | 444 | |
| 1989 | — | #418 | 497 | |
| 1988 | #8,391 | 8 | #403 | 492 |
| 1987 | #9,825 | 6 | #368 | 525 |
| 1986 | — | #370 | 503 | |
| 1985 | #6,955 | 9 | #334 | 574 |
| 1984 | #8,153 | 7 | #324 | 594 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #313 | 624 |
| 1982 | #10,517 | 5 | #312 | 634 |
| 1981 | — | #292 | 685 | |
| 1980 | #8,178 | 7 | #286 | 725 |
| 1979 | #7,313 | 8 | #291 | 695 |
| 1978 | #4,931 | 13 | #266 | 739 |
| 1977 | #4,652 | 14 | #262 | 755 |
| 1976 | #6,611 | 8 | #244 | 825 |
| 1975 | #5,984 | 9 | #241 | 849 |
| 1974 | #5,776 | 9 | #215 | 1,000 |
| 1973 | #5,191 | 10 | #219 | 987 |
| 1972 | #5,109 | 10 | #198 | 1,171 |
| 1971 | #3,166 | 21 | #190 | 1,342 |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 | #181 | 1,522 |
| 1969 | #3,012 | 20 | #169 | 1,647 |
| 1968 | #2,708 | 22 | #155 | 1,767 |
| 1967 | #2,781 | 20 | #146 | 1,955 |
| 1966 | #3,266 | 15 | #137 | 2,171 |
| 1965 | #2,833 | 19 | #134 | 2,302 |
| 1964 | #3,515 | 14 | #144 | 2,258 |
| 1963 | #2,780 | 20 | #138 | 2,478 |
| 1962 | #3,782 | 12 | #130 | 2,788 |
| 1961 | #3,608 | 13 | #134 | 2,687 |
| 1960 | #2,432 | 24 | #132 | 2,700 |
| 1959 | #2,596 | 20 | #131 | 2,776 |
| 1958 | #2,755 | 18 | #125 | 3,074 |
| 1957 | #3,033 | 15 | #118 | 3,340 |
| 1956 | #2,622 | 19 | #107 | 3,417 |
| 1955 | #2,063 | 27 | #102 | 3,411 |
| 1954 | #3,325 | 12 | #99 | 3,417 |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | #98 | 3,372 |
| 1952 | #2,671 | 16 | #96 | 3,572 |
| 1951 | #2,810 | 14 | #90 | 3,729 |
| 1950 | #2,002 | 23 | #90 | 3,641 |
| 1949 | #3,892 | 8 | #90 | 3,668 |
| 1948 | #2,329 | 18 | #85 | 3,894 |
| 1947 | #2,637 | 15 | #81 | 4,410 |
| 1946 | #2,024 | 21 | #76 | 4,161 |
| 1945 | #2,149 | 16 | #65 | 3,726 |
| 1944 | #1,609 | 26 | #58 | 4,065 |
| 1943 | #1,900 | 21 | #56 | 4,522 |
| 1942 | #1,917 | 20 | #53 | 4,683 |
| 1941 | #1,649 | 23 | #49 | 4,459 |
| 1940 | #1,549 | 25 | #48 | 4,576 |
| 1939 | #1,947 | 17 | #44 | 4,742 |
| 1938 | #1,182 | 38 | #43 | 4,953 |
| 1937 | #1,580 | 23 | #43 | 4,673 |
| 1936 | #1,507 | 24 | #43 | 4,645 |
| 1935 | #1,779 | 19 | #38 | 5,043 |
| 1934 | #1,651 | 21 | #38 | 4,989 |
| 1933 | #1,123 | 39 | #37 | 4,959 |
| 1932 | #1,043 | 46 | #37 | 5,268 |
| 1931 | #1,199 | 36 | #36 | 5,426 |
| 1930 | #1,161 | 41 | #40 | 5,289 |
| 1929 | #968 | 55 | #40 | 5,157 |
| 1928 | #1,097 | 47 | #39 | 5,590 |
| 1927 | #1,097 | 48 | #39 | 5,494 |
| 1926 | #1,004 | 55 | #39 | 5,282 |
| 1925 | #1,296 | 37 | #41 | 4,975 |
| 1924 | #1,382 | 35 | #42 | 5,045 |
| 1923 | #1,556 | 28 | #44 | 4,706 |
| 1922 | #1,285 | 37 | #44 | 4,527 |
| 1921 | #1,668 | 26 | #46 | 4,479 |
| 1920 | #1,375 | 33 | #47 | 4,109 |
| 1919 | #1,649 | 24 | #48 | 3,809 |
| 1918 | #1,497 | 28 | #49 | 3,867 |
| 1917 | #1,773 | 20 | #46 | 3,788 |
| 1916 | #1,533 | 24 | #48 | 3,609 |
| 1915 | #1,672 | 20 | #50 | 3,262 |
| 1914 | #1,896 | 13 | #54 | 2,335 |
| 1913 | #1,883 | 11 | #57 | 1,748 |
| 1912 | #1,719 | 11 | #61 | 1,367 |
| 1911 | — | #63 | 691 | |
| 1910 | — | #63 | 557 | |
| 1909 | — | #75 | 415 | |
| 1908 | — | #74 | 374 | |
| 1907 | #1,821 | 6 | #75 | 362 |
| 1906 | — | #76 | 324 | |
| 1905 | #1,931 | 5 | #71 | 350 |
| 1904 | — | #77 | 305 | |
| 1903 | — | #86 | 238 | |
| 1902 | #1,793 | 5 | #84 | 256 |
| 1901 | — | #83 | 238 | |
| 1900 | #1,932 | 5 | #82 | 316 |
| 1899 | #1,596 | 5 | #83 | 223 |
| 1898 | — | #96 | 207 | |
| 1897 | — | #91 | 197 | |
| 1896 | — | #104 | 178 | |
| 1895 | — | #90 | 211 | |
| 1894 | — | #95 | 199 | |
| 1893 | #1,277 | 6 | #105 | 166 |
| 1892 | — | #98 | 191 | |
| 1891 | — | #99 | 163 | |
| 1890 | — | #107 | 156 | |
| 1889 | — | #112 | 141 | |
| 1888 | — | #107 | 156 | |
| 1887 | — | #113 | 119 | |
| 1886 | — | #96 | 161 | |
| 1885 | — | #116 | 118 | |
| 1884 | — | #113 | 130 | |
| 1883 | — | #120 | 106 | |
| 1882 | — | #130 | 107 | |
| 1881 | — | #124 | 95 | |
| 1880 | — | #131 | 102 | |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Norman was already there! It came in at #131, and was given to 102 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1885, when fewer than 140 boys a year got the name.
Where Norman is popular in 1960
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alaska#49 · 1 in 200
- Rhode Island#59 · 1 in 334
- Vermont#65 · 1 in 299
- Maine#67 · 1 in 304
- New Hampshire#69 · 1 in 358
Best ever in a state: #14 in Idaho, 1931.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | #49 | 16 | 1 in 200 |
| Rhode Island | #59 | 27 | 1 in 334 |
| Vermont | #65 | 13 | 1 in 299 |
| Maine | #67 | 36 | 1 in 304 |
| New Hampshire | #69 | 17 | 1 in 358 |
| Delaware | #83 | 11 | 1 in 463 |
| District of Columbia | #85 | 34 | 1 in 438 |
| Hawaii | #88 | 22 | 1 in 331 |
| Massachusetts | #89 | 77 | 1 in 743 |
| Maryland | #96 | 68 | 1 in 482 |
| Connecticut | #97 | 37 | 1 in 723 |
| Kentucky | #102 | 59 | 1 in 601 |
| Virginia | #105 | 80 | 1 in 528 |
| Nevada | #109 | 7 | 1 in 411 |
| New Mexico | #110 | 31 | 1 in 443 |
| Kansas | #114 | 38 | 1 in 603 |
| Colorado | #115 | 41 | 1 in 520 |
| New Jersey | #115 | 77 | 1 in 807 |
| Michigan | #118 | 136 | 1 in 694 |
| Pennsylvania | #118 | 154 | 1 in 778 |
| Washington | #120 | 47 | 1 in 659 |
| Wyoming | #121 | 7 | 1 in 483 |
| West Virginia | #122 | 26 | 1 in 729 |
| Indiana | #123 | 73 | 1 in 743 |
| Iowa | #131 | 35 | 1 in 893 |
| South Carolina | #131 | 44 | 1 in 645 |
| Florida | #132 | 81 | 1 in 677 |
| North Carolina | #134 | 75 | 1 in 696 |
| Oregon | #135 | 24 | 1 in 753 |
| New York | #138 | 192 | 1 in 935 |
| Missouri | #140 | 61 | 1 in 802 |
| Idaho | #141 | 11 | 1 in 680 |
| Louisiana | #142 | 64 | 1 in 659 |
| Ohio | #142 | 122 | 1 in 920 |
| Alabama | #143 | 52 | 1 in 727 |
| Illinois | #147 | 124 | 1 in 934 |
| Nebraska | #147 | 17 | 1 in 959 |
| Arizona | #148 | 25 | 1 in 679 |
| California | #148 | 234 | 1 in 794 |
| Utah | #149 | 16 | 1 in 759 |
| Wisconsin | #153 | 36 | 1 in 1,335 |
| Tennessee | #154 | 41 | 1 in 963 |
| Georgia | #156 | 57 | 1 in 846 |
| Montana | #156 | 10 | 1 in 760 |
| Mississippi | #165 | 31 | 1 in 867 |
| Arkansas | #169 | 19 | 1 in 1,015 |
| Texas | #174 | 144 | 1 in 852 |
| Minnesota | #179 | 24 | 1 in 1,769 |
| South Dakota | #184 | 6 | 1 in 1,307 |
| Oklahoma | #204 | 18 | 1 in 1,320 |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Norman
- 112 spots since 2024 (#1,308 → #1,196)
- 69 spots since 2020 (#1,127 → #1,196)
- 35 spots since 2015 (#1,231 → #1,196)
- Biggest jump: 40 spots in 1991 (#469 → #429)
- Biggest drop: 130 spots in 2009 (#995 → #1,125)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1931 at #36 (5,426 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 29 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 63 yrs · run 1897–1954
- Top 1,000: 127 yrs · run 1880–2005
- Highest: 1 in 192 boys born in 1931 were named Norman (0.52%)
- Latest: 1 in 10,107 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- 19.7% of all boys named Norman (49,987) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 1,235 | #96 (1886) | #116 |
| 1890s | 1,891 | #83 (1899) | #97 |
| 1900s | 3,178 | #71 (1905) | #78 |
| 1910s | 25,033 | #46 (1917) | #54 |
| 1920s | 49,364 | #39 (1928) | #42 |
| 1930s | 49,987 | #36 (1931) | #40 |
| 1940s | 42,164 | #48 (1940) | #66 |
| 1950s | 33,749 | #90 (1951) | #106 |
| 1960s | 22,753 | #130 (1962) | #142 |
| 1970s | 9,885 | #181 (1970) | #231 |
| 1980s | 5,853 | #286 (1980) | #342 |
| 1990s | 3,439 | #429 (1991) | #568 |
| 2000s | 2,071 | #663 (2000) | #890 |
| 2010s | 1,590 | #1,077 (2016) | #1,171 |
| 2020s | 968 | #1,127 (2020) | #1,225 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Norman in 1960
Top girls' names in 1960
Top boys' names in 1960
More about 1960
girls
2,021,941 girls got a published name in 1960; 1 in 84,248 of them was named Norman, which outranked 66.8% of the 7,332 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 17.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
- #2,369Twanna25
- #2,369Vena25
- #2,369Wayne25
- #2,432Norman24
- #2,432Alaine24
- #2,432Andrew24
- #2,432Andy24
- #2,512Adrianna23
- #2,512Alita23
- #2,512America23
Tied with 79 names at #2,432; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.
boys
2,132,320 boys got a published name in 1960; 1 in 790 of them was named Norman, which outranked 97.1% of the 4,598 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 29.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.