Oakleigh
#666 for girls in 2025, 423 births · Last seen for boys in 2022 at #10,863
Given to girls 99.6% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2023 · 598 births
- Debut · girls
- 8 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,121since 2005
Oakleigh over time
Rank among girls' names. Oakleigh has never cracked the top 500 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #666 | 423 | — | |
| 2024 | #629 | 471 | — | |
| 2023 | #507 | 598 | — | |
| 2022 | #522 | 597 | #10,863 | 6 |
| 2021 | #605 | 495 | #10,799 | 6 |
| 2020 | #858 | 315 | — | |
| 2019 | #854 | 313 | — | |
| 2018 | #1,162 | 207 | #12,156 | 5 |
| 2017 | #1,291 | 182 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,550 | 144 | — | |
| 2015 | #1,793 | 116 | — | |
| 2014 | #2,351 | 78 | — | |
| 2013 | #3,218 | 50 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,169 | 52 | — | |
| 2011 | #5,063 | 27 | — | |
| 2010 | #8,701 | 13 | — | |
| 2009 | #9,379 | 12 | — | |
| 2008 | #10,807 | 10 | — | |
| 2007 | #17,636 | 5 | — | |
| 2006 | #17,168 | 5 | — | |
| 2005 | #11,834 | 8 | — | |
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oakleigh! It came in at #11,834, and was given to 8 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2006–2007, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Oakleigh is popular in 2024
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Alabama#158 · 1 in 645
- Mississippi#173 · 1 in 594
- West Virginia#218 · 1 in 743
- Oklahoma#247 · 1 in 918
- Kentucky#248 · 1 in 971
Best ever in a state: #122 in Mississippi, 2023.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | #158 | 29 | 1 in 645 |
| Mississippi | #173 | 15 | 1 in 594 |
| West Virginia | #218 | 7 | 1 in 743 |
| Oklahoma | #247 | 16 | 1 in 918 |
| Kentucky | #248 | 18 | 1 in 971 |
| Arkansas | #279 | 10 | 1 in 1,053 |
| Tennessee | #296 | 26 | 1 in 1,231 |
| Louisiana | #304 | 15 | 1 in 1,137 |
| Missouri | #317 | 18 | 1 in 1,322 |
| South Carolina | #359 | 14 | 1 in 1,302 |
| Kansas | #388 | 8 | 1 in 1,437 |
| Nebraska | #433 | 5 | 1 in 1,497 |
| North Carolina | #441 | 24 | 1 in 1,926 |
| Maryland | #471 | 11 | 1 in 1,893 |
| Ohio | #484 | 22 | 1 in 2,127 |
| Virginia | #492 | 16 | 1 in 2,128 |
| Michigan | #506 | 17 | 1 in 2,103 |
| Pennsylvania | #525 | 20 | 1 in 2,317 |
| Georgia | #538 | 19 | 1 in 2,395 |
| Wisconsin | #543 | 9 | 1 in 2,256 |
| Indiana | #561 | 12 | 1 in 2,345 |
| Florida | #648 | 27 | 1 in 3,196 |
| Minnesota | #762 | 6 | 1 in 3,555 |
| Illinois | #764 | 12 | 1 in 3,745 |
| Colorado | #772 | 6 | 1 in 3,789 |
| Arizona | #945 | 6 | 1 in 4,674 |
| Washington | #952 | 6 | 1 in 4,847 |
| Texas | #1,299 | 20 | 1 in 8,168 |
| New York | #1,324 | 10 | 1 in 7,861 |
| California | #1,912 | 11 | 1 in 15,060 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oakleigh
- 37 spots since 2024 (#629 → #666)
- 192 spots since 2020 (#858 → #666)
- 1,127 spots since 2015 (#1,793 → #666)
- Biggest jump: 308 spots in 2019 (#1,162 → #854)
- Biggest drop: 122 spots in 2024 (#507 → #629)
- Debuted 2005
- Peaked 2023 at #507 (598 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 2019–2025
- Highest: 1 in 2,683 girls born in 2023 were named Oakleigh (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,800 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
- 70.3% of all girls named Oakleigh (2,899) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | #9,379 (2009) | #13,365 |
| 2010s | 1,182 | #854 (2019) | #2,915 |
| 2020s | 2,899 | #507 (2023) | #631 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oakleigh in 2024
Top girls' names in 2024
More about 2024
girls
1,620,190 girls got a published name in 2024; 1 in 3,440 of them was named Oakleigh, which outranked 96.5% of the 17,726 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.