Oaklynn
#153 for girls in 2025, 1,964 births · #8,243 for boys in 2025, 9 births
Given to girls 99.2% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2025 · 1,964 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 11,766since 2008
Oaklynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Oaklynn has never cracked the top 100 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #153 | 1,964 | #8,243 | 9 |
| 2024 | #156 | 1,906 | #8,987 | 8 |
| 2023 | #157 | 1,827 | #5,470 | 17 |
| 2022 | #160 | 1,833 | #5,215 | 18 |
| 2021 | #206 | 1,446 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #307 | 1,037 | #8,739 | 8 |
| 2019 | #504 | 625 | #7,643 | 10 |
| 2018 | #542 | 574 | #7,136 | 11 |
| 2017 | #888 | 305 | — | |
| 2016 | #1,908 | 105 | — | |
| 2015 | #3,001 | 57 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,178 | 35 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,143 | 26 | — | |
| 2012 | #8,632 | 13 | — | |
| 2011 | #12,153 | 8 | — | |
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | #17,504 | 5 | — | |
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Oaklynn! It came in at #17,504, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 2008–2010, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Oaklynn is popular in 2020
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- South Dakota#28 · 1 in 147
- Wyoming#61 · 1 in 143
- West Virginia#62 · 1 in 237
- Kentucky#71 · 1 in 360
- Oklahoma#110 · 1 in 462
Best ever in a state: #8 in West Virginia, 2025.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | #28 | 18 | 1 in 147 |
| Wyoming | #61 | 6 | 1 in 143 |
| West Virginia | #62 | 23 | 1 in 237 |
| Kentucky | #71 | 47 | 1 in 360 |
| Oklahoma | #110 | 32 | 1 in 462 |
| Ohio | #122 | 79 | 1 in 606 |
| Iowa | #125 | 23 | 1 in 501 |
| Tennessee | #135 | 48 | 1 in 633 |
| Indiana | #141 | 43 | 1 in 651 |
| Idaho | #147 | 12 | 1 in 509 |
| Alabama | #149 | 29 | 1 in 645 |
| Missouri | #156 | 38 | 1 in 644 |
| Nebraska | #172 | 12 | 1 in 592 |
| Wisconsin | #173 | 29 | 1 in 716 |
| Kansas | #177 | 17 | 1 in 673 |
| New Hampshire | #183 | 6 | 1 in 577 |
| Minnesota | #187 | 30 | 1 in 722 |
| North Dakota | #198 | 5 | 1 in 560 |
| Michigan | #211 | 43 | 1 in 880 |
| Utah | #215 | 19 | 1 in 848 |
| Virginia | #215 | 37 | 1 in 923 |
| Mississippi | #219 | 13 | 1 in 780 |
| Arkansas | #237 | 12 | 1 in 861 |
| South Carolina | #237 | 19 | 1 in 911 |
| Georgia | #258 | 42 | 1 in 1,059 |
| North Carolina | #268 | 38 | 1 in 1,148 |
| Washington | #296 | 23 | 1 in 1,266 |
| Pennsylvania | #300 | 37 | 1 in 1,307 |
| Louisiana | #331 | 15 | 1 in 1,233 |
| Illinois | #368 | 30 | 1 in 1,625 |
| Oregon | #424 | 8 | 1 in 1,636 |
| Arizona | #431 | 15 | 1 in 1,844 |
| Texas | #448 | 73 | 1 in 2,095 |
| Colorado | #469 | 11 | 1 in 1,959 |
| Florida | #498 | 34 | 1 in 2,366 |
| New York | #663 | 24 | 1 in 3,316 |
| Maryland | #714 | 7 | 1 in 3,188 |
| California | #1,804 | 12 | 1 in 14,518 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Oaklynn
- 3 spots since 2024 (#156 → #153)
- 154 spots since 2020 (#307 → #153)
- 2,848 spots since 2015 (#3,001 → #153)
- Biggest jump: 1,020 spots in 2017 (#1,908 → #888)
- Debuted 2008
- Peaked 2025 at #153 (1,964 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 9 yrs · run 2017–2025
- Highest: 1 in 818 girls born in 2025 were named Oaklynn (0.12%)
- 85.1% of all girls named Oaklynn (10,013) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 | #17,504 (2008) | #17,504 |
| 2010s | 1,748 | #504 (2019) | #4,105 |
| 2020s | 10,013 | #153 (2025) | #190 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Oaklynn in 2020
Top girls' names in 2020
Top boys' names in 2020
More about 2020
girls
1,616,549 girls got a published name in 2020; 1 in 1,559 of them was named Oaklynn, which outranked 98.2% of the 17,527 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
boys
1,726,076 boys got a published name in 2020; 1 in 215,760 of them was named Oaklynn, which outranked 37.8% of the 14,060 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 7.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #8,067Zyking9
- #8,067Zyrie9
- #8,067Zyrus9
- #8,739Oaklynn8
- #8,739Aadith8
- #8,739Aadithya8
- #8,739Aarushreddy8
- #9,554Aadav7
- #9,554Aahir7
- #9,554Aalim7
Tied with 814 names at #8,739; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
- ↓ 380Vivaan#875 → #1,255
- ↓ 282Alexzander#890 → #1,172
- ↓ 268Reyansh#806 → #1,074
- ↓ 266Javion#949 → #1,215
- ↓ 224Kenny#862 → #1,086
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.