Om

#2,167 for boys in 2025, 66 births

Peak · boys
2008 · 153 births
Debut · boys
5 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
2,321
since 1983

Om over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Om has never cracked the top 1,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202009peak #1,169, 2008boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yearboys
rankbirths
2025#2,16766
2024#2,15668
2023#2,22164
2022#2,40858
2021#1,93178
2020#1,91177
2019#2,06270
2018#1,90178
2017#1,64496
2016#1,77486
2015#1,75387
2014#1,73087
2013#1,64792
2012#1,551102
2011#1,516105
2010#1,415117
2009#1,214148
2008#1,169153
2007#1,423114
2006#1,467104
2005#1,334113
2004#1,183131
2003#1,190124
2002#2,24946
2001#3,72122
2000#5,29713
1999#7,1398
1998#6,3149
1997—
1996—
1995—
1994—
1993—
1992—
1991—
1990—
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983#6,2385
1982—
1981—
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1983

The first year at least five boys were named Om! It came in at #6,238, and was given to 5 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1983–1997, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.

Where Om is popular in 2009

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedMNIllinois: #667 for boys · 15 births · 1 in 4,837 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedWIMichigan: #829 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 7,051 boysMINew York: #1,432 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 15,387 boysNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #1,128 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 12,424 boysPANew Jersey: #325 for boys · 23 births · 1 in 1,940 boysNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #917 for boys · 24 births · 1 in 10,089 boysCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedALGeorgia: #799 for boys · 10 births · 1 in 5,902 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Om, so not publishedHITexas: #1,662 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 23,307 boysTXFlorida: #1,453 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 15,883 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. New Jersey#325 · 1 in 1,940
  2. Illinois#667 · 1 in 4,837
  3. Georgia#799 · 1 in 5,902
  4. Michigan#829 · 1 in 7,051
  5. California#917 · 1 in 10,089

Best ever in a state: #296 in New Jersey, 2003.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
New Jersey#325231 in 1,940
Illinois#667151 in 4,837
Georgia#799101 in 5,902
Michigan#82971 in 7,051
California#917241 in 10,089
Pennsylvania#1,12851 in 12,424
New York#1,43271 in 15,387
Florida#1,45361 in 15,883
Texas#1,66281 in 23,307
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Om
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 11 spots since 2024 (#2,156 → #2,167)
  • 256 spots since 2020 (#1,911 → #2,167)
  • 414 spots since 2015 (#1,753 → #2,167)
Rise & fade · boys
25 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1983
  • Peaked 2008 at #1,169 (153 births)
  • Births halved by 2019, 11 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 13,334
  • Highest: 1 in 13,334 boys born in 2008 were named Om (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 25,880 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2000s
  • 41.7% of all boys named Om (968) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1980s5#6,238 (1983)#6,238
1990s17#6,314 (1998)#6,727
2000s968#1,169 (2008)#2,025
2010s920#1,415 (2010)#1,699
2020s411#1,911 (2020)#2,132

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Om in 2009

boys
#1,214
148 births · 1 in 13,403 boys

Top boys' names in 2009

  1. #1Jacob21,204
  2. #2Ethan19,858
  3. #3Michael18,964
  4. #4Alexander18,254
  5. #5William17,937
  6. #6Joshua17,671
  7. #7Daniel17,564
  8. #8Jayden17,316
  9. #9Noah17,262
  10. #10Christopher16,368
  11. #1,214Om148
More about 2009

boys

1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 13,403 of them was named Om, which outranked 91.7% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Om
  1. #1,209Bayron149
  2. #1,209Benny149
  3. #1,209Stephon149
  4. #1,214Om148
  5. #1,214Ishan148
  6. #1,214Jermiah148
  7. #1,214Neel148
  8. #1,218Austen147
  9. #1,218Avraham147
  10. #1,218Bilal147

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
  1. ↑ 951Knox#1,655 → #704
  2. ↑ 510Kellan#1,133 → #623
  3. ↑ 462Jaxen#1,329 → #867
  4. ↑ 422Bentley#936 → #514
  5. ↑ 354Archer#1,037 → #683
Fallers
  1. ↓ 493Yurem#995 → #1,488
  2. ↓ 222Cordell#786 → #1,008
  3. ↓ 212Shamar#926 → #1,138
  4. ↓ 201Trevin#797 → #998
  5. ↓ 198Glenn#865 → #1,063

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2009 →