Onnie
- Last seen for girls in 2023 at #15,194
- Last seen for boys in 1988 at #7,270
- Given to girls 62.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1901 · 13 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,079since 1886
Onnie over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | #15,194 | 5 | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | #15,242 | 6 | — | |
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | #7,270 | 5 | |
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #5,355 | 6 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | #9,652 | 5 | #5,123 | 6 |
| 1976 | — | #5,587 | 5 | |
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | #3,963 | 7 | |
| 1971 | — | #4,375 | 6 | |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 | — | |
| 1969 | — | #2,682 | 11 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | #4,866 | 8 | #3,948 | 5 |
| 1965 | — | #3,537 | 6 | |
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | #4,272 | 10 | — | |
| 1962 | — | #4,033 | 5 | |
| 1961 | — | #2,409 | 12 | |
| 1960 | #5,696 | 6 | #2,871 | 9 |
| 1959 | #4,625 | 8 | #3,290 | 7 |
| 1958 | #3,379 | 13 | #3,033 | 8 |
| 1957 | #3,696 | 11 | #3,024 | 8 |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | #2,497 | 11 |
| 1955 | #3,571 | 11 | #2,964 | 8 |
| 1954 | #4,655 | 7 | — | |
| 1953 | #3,687 | 10 | #3,143 | 7 |
| 1952 | #4,123 | 8 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1951 | #3,482 | 10 | #2,662 | 9 |
| 1950 | #2,909 | 13 | #3,021 | 7 |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 | #3,690 | 5 |
| 1948 | #3,350 | 10 | #3,316 | 6 |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | #1,916 | 16 |
| 1946 | #2,880 | 12 | #2,534 | 9 |
| 1945 | #2,149 | 16 | #2,996 | 6 |
| 1944 | #2,199 | 16 | #2,862 | 7 |
| 1943 | #3,249 | 9 | #2,732 | 8 |
| 1942 | #2,311 | 15 | #3,212 | 6 |
| 1941 | #2,272 | 14 | #2,333 | 10 |
| 1940 | #2,737 | 10 | #2,179 | 11 |
| 1939 | #1,947 | 17 | #2,449 | 9 |
| 1938 | #1,547 | 24 | #2,326 | 10 |
| 1937 | #2,101 | 15 | #1,688 | 17 |
| 1936 | #1,950 | 16 | #1,639 | 17 |
| 1935 | #1,917 | 17 | #1,837 | 15 |
| 1934 | #1,697 | 20 | #1,932 | 14 |
| 1933 | #3,109 | 8 | #3,004 | 7 |
| 1932 | #2,365 | 13 | #2,465 | 10 |
| 1931 | #1,635 | 22 | #2,864 | 8 |
| 1930 | #1,815 | 20 | #2,609 | 10 |
| 1929 | #1,892 | 19 | #2,317 | 12 |
| 1928 | #1,589 | 26 | #2,387 | 12 |
| 1927 | #1,559 | 28 | #2,193 | 14 |
| 1926 | #1,667 | 25 | #2,436 | 12 |
| 1925 | #1,504 | 30 | #2,089 | 15 |
| 1924 | #1,770 | 24 | #2,132 | 15 |
| 1923 | #1,428 | 32 | #2,446 | 12 |
| 1922 | #1,403 | 33 | #2,801 | 10 |
| 1921 | #1,577 | 28 | #2,265 | 14 |
| 1920 | #2,079 | 18 | #1,642 | 22 |
| 1919 | #1,855 | 20 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1918 | #1,360 | 32 | #2,543 | 11 |
| 1917 | #1,552 | 24 | #1,693 | 19 |
| 1916 | #1,581 | 23 | #1,505 | 22 |
| 1915 | #1,285 | 30 | #1,306 | 26 |
| 1914 | #1,541 | 18 | #1,772 | 13 |
| 1913 | #1,229 | 21 | #1,803 | 10 |
| 1912 | #1,540 | 13 | #1,619 | 10 |
| 1911 | #1,372 | 12 | — | |
| 1910 | #1,421 | 11 | #1,589 | 5 |
| 1909 | #1,607 | 8 | — | |
| 1908 | #1,676 | 7 | — | |
| 1907 | #945 | 16 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,101 | 12 | #1,111 | 6 |
| 1905 | #968 | 15 | — | |
| 1904 | #938 | 15 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,204 | 9 | — | |
| 1902 | #1,133 | 10 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #918 | 13 | — | |
| 1900 | — | #1,162 | 6 | |
| 1899 | #1,394 | 6 | #928 | 6 |
| 1898 | #920 | 14 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,555 | 5 | #942 | 6 |
| 1896 | #1,122 | 9 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,426 | 6 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,485 | 5 | — | |
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | #1,338 | 5 | — | |
| 1889 | #1,025 | 7 | — | |
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | #937 | 7 | — | |
| 1886 | #1,108 | 5 | — | |
| 1885 | — | #936 | 5 | |
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1886
The first year at least five girls were named Onnie! It came in at #1,108, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1888, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Onnie is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Onnie in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Onnie
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2023
- Biggest jump: 635 spots in 1898
- Biggest drop: 731 spots in 1908
Rise & fade · girls
15 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1886
- Peaked 1901 at #918 (13 births)
- Births halved by 1960, 59 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 6 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 6 yrs · run 1904–1905
Share of babies · girls
1 in 18,357
- Highest: 1 in 18,357 girls born in 1904 were named Onnie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 320,916 girls born in 2023 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #918 in 1901, was only 1 in 18,411 (0.01%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 24.4% of all girls named Onnie (263) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2009
- Mostly boys until 2008, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 19 | #937 (1887) | #1,023 |
| 1890s | 50 | #920 (1898) | #1,320 |
| 1900s | 105 | #918 (1901) | #1,166 |
| 1910s | 204 | #1,229 (1913) | #1,474 |
| 1920s | 263 | #1,403 (1922) | #1,647 |
| 1930s | 172 | #1,547 (1938) | #2,008 |
| 1940s | 120 | #2,149 (1945) | #2,867 |
| 1950s | 98 | #2,909 (1950) | #3,896 |
| 1960s | 24 | #4,272 (1963) | #4,945 |
| 1970s | 13 | #5,818 (1970) | #7,735 |
| 1980s | 0 | — | — |
| 1990s | 0 | — | — |
| 2000s | 6 | #15,242 (2009) | #15,242 |
| 2010s | 0 | — | — |
| 2020s | 5 | #15,194 (2023) | #15,194 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Onnie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: