Osborne
#4,539 for boys in 2025, 22 births
- Peak · boys
- 1910 · 19 births
- Debut · boys
- 7 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,754since 1880
Osborne over time
Rank among boys' names. Osborne has never cracked the top 600 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | boys | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #4,539 | 22 |
| 2024 | #5,904 | 15 |
| 2023 | #6,220 | 14 |
| 2022 | #5,215 | 18 |
| 2021 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #4,426 | 22 |
| 2019 | #4,639 | 21 |
| 2018 | #8,819 | 8 |
| 2017 | #6,338 | 13 |
| 2016 | #8,146 | 9 |
| 2015 | #7,491 | 10 |
| 2014 | #10,717 | 6 |
| 2013 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | #10,770 | 6 |
| 2011 | #8,767 | 8 |
| 2010 | #8,803 | 8 |
| 2009 | #12,491 | 5 |
| 2008 | — | |
| 2007 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #12,055 | 5 |
| 2005 | — | |
| 2004 | — | |
| 2003 | — | |
| 2002 | #8,456 | 7 |
| 2001 | #9,243 | 6 |
| 2000 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #9,912 | 5 |
| 1998 | — | |
| 1997 | — | |
| 1996 | #9,015 | 5 |
| 1995 | — | |
| 1994 | — | |
| 1993 | — | |
| 1992 | — | |
| 1991 | — | |
| 1990 | #8,117 | 5 |
| 1989 | — | |
| 1988 | #4,162 | 11 |
| 1987 | — | |
| 1986 | #5,926 | 6 |
| 1985 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | #4,973 | 7 |
| 1983 | — | |
| 1982 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #3,412 | 12 |
| 1980 | #6,250 | 5 |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | #4,157 | 8 |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | #4,418 | 7 |
| 1975 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #4,190 | 7 |
| 1973 | #5,101 | 5 |
| 1972 | #4,986 | 5 |
| 1971 | #3,963 | 7 |
| 1970 | #2,891 | 11 |
| 1969 | #4,404 | 5 |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,966 | 5 |
| 1966 | #2,784 | 9 |
| 1965 | #2,982 | 8 |
| 1964 | #2,114 | 15 |
| 1963 | #1,957 | 17 |
| 1962 | #3,640 | 6 |
| 1961 | #2,900 | 9 |
| 1960 | #1,973 | 17 |
| 1959 | #1,806 | 20 |
| 1958 | #1,838 | 19 |
| 1957 | #1,751 | 21 |
| 1956 | #2,263 | 13 |
| 1955 | #1,979 | 16 |
| 1954 | #2,207 | 13 |
| 1953 | #1,427 | 28 |
| 1952 | #2,153 | 13 |
| 1951 | #1,838 | 17 |
| 1950 | #1,879 | 16 |
| 1949 | #1,583 | 22 |
| 1948 | #1,881 | 16 |
| 1947 | #1,394 | 28 |
| 1946 | #1,692 | 18 |
| 1945 | #1,581 | 18 |
| 1944 | #1,810 | 15 |
| 1943 | #1,764 | 17 |
| 1942 | #1,537 | 21 |
| 1941 | #1,532 | 20 |
| 1940 | #1,736 | 16 |
| 1939 | #1,712 | 16 |
| 1938 | #1,976 | 13 |
| 1937 | #1,444 | 22 |
| 1936 | #1,205 | 30 |
| 1935 | #1,390 | 24 |
| 1934 | #2,022 | 13 |
| 1933 | #1,707 | 17 |
| 1932 | #1,356 | 26 |
| 1931 | #1,538 | 21 |
| 1930 | #1,559 | 22 |
| 1929 | #1,731 | 19 |
| 1928 | #1,448 | 26 |
| 1927 | #1,372 | 29 |
| 1926 | #1,264 | 33 |
| 1925 | #1,144 | 38 |
| 1924 | #1,355 | 30 |
| 1923 | #1,358 | 29 |
| 1922 | #1,308 | 31 |
| 1921 | #1,199 | 36 |
| 1920 | #1,180 | 37 |
| 1919 | #1,188 | 35 |
| 1918 | #1,124 | 37 |
| 1917 | #1,017 | 41 |
| 1916 | #1,043 | 38 |
| 1915 | #906 | 47 |
| 1914 | #1,019 | 30 |
| 1913 | #995 | 25 |
| 1912 | #835 | 28 |
| 1911 | #896 | 14 |
| 1910 | #677 | 19 |
| 1909 | #1,277 | 6 |
| 1908 | #1,373 | 5 |
| 1907 | #1,200 | 6 |
| 1906 | #1,004 | 7 |
| 1905 | #836 | 9 |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | #1,009 | 6 |
| 1902 | #1,137 | 5 |
| 1901 | #1,058 | 5 |
| 1900 | #1,162 | 6 |
| 1899 | #928 | 6 |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | #982 | 6 |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | #857 | 7 |
| 1893 | #1,035 | 5 |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | #815 | 7 |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | #845 | 6 |
| 1885 | #836 | 6 |
| 1884 | #971 | 5 |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | #745 | 7 |
In the first year the SSA published name data, Osborne was already there! It came in at #745, and was given to 7 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881–1884, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Osborne is popular in 1928
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Virginia#388 · 1 in 4,521
Best ever in a state: #218 in Maryland, 1921.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | #388 | 5 | 1 in 4,521 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Florida | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Illinois | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Carolina | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Osborne
- 1,365 spots since 2024 (#5,904 → #4,539)
- 113 spots since 2020 (#4,426 → #4,539)
- 2,952 spots since 2015 (#7,491 → #4,539)
- Biggest jump: 600 spots in 1910 (#1,277 → #677)
- Biggest drop: 234 spots in 1900 (#928 → #1,162)
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1910 at #677 (19 births)
- Births halved by 1961, 51 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 14 yrs · run 1910–1913
- Highest: 1 in 10,221 boys born in 1910 were named Osborne (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 77,640 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 17.9% of all boys named Osborne (314) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 31 | #745 (1880) | #842 |
| 1890s | 24 | #857 (1894) | #951 |
| 1900s | 55 | #836 (1905) | #1,117 |
| 1910s | 314 | #677 (1910) | #970 |
| 1920s | 308 | #1,144 (1925) | #1,336 |
| 1930s | 204 | #1,205 (1936) | #1,591 |
| 1940s | 191 | #1,394 (1947) | #1,651 |
| 1950s | 176 | #1,427 (1953) | #1,914 |
| 1960s | 91 | #1,957 (1963) | #2,969 |
| 1970s | 55 | #2,891 (1970) | #4,396 |
| 1980s | 51 | #3,412 (1981) | #5,376 |
| 1990s | 15 | #8,117 (1990) | #9,015 |
| 2000s | 34 | #8,456 (2002) | #10,621 |
| 2010s | 98 | #4,639 (2019) | #8,261 |
| 2020s | 107 | #4,426 (2020) | #5,311 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Osborne in 1928
Top boys' names in 1928
More about 1928
boys
1,107,613 boys got a published name in 1928; 1 in 42,601 of them was named Osborne, which outranked 69.3% of the 4,723 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).
- #1,413Victoriano27
- #1,413Wendall27
- #1,413Winifred27
- #1,448Osborne26
- #1,448Anselmo26
- #1,448Ardis26
- #1,448Arno26
- #1,480Alvan25
- #1,480Ancil25
- #1,480Budd25
Tied with 31 names at #1,448; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.