Osmond
- #6,446 for boys in 2025, 13 births
- Peak · boys
- 1912 · 12 births
- Debut · boys
- 12 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 470since 1912
Osmond over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Osmond has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | boys | |
|---|---|---|
| rank | births | |
| 2025 | #6,446 | 13 |
| 2024 | #6,469 | 13 |
| 2023 | #7,289 | 11 |
| 2022 | #5,019 | 19 |
| 2021 | #5,562 | 16 |
| 2020 | #8,067 | 9 |
| 2019 | #8,889 | 8 |
| 2018 | #8,154 | 9 |
| 2017 | #6,338 | 13 |
| 2016 | #6,053 | 14 |
| 2015 | #7,066 | 11 |
| 2014 | #8,130 | 9 |
| 2013 | #8,118 | 9 |
| 2012 | — | |
| 2011 | — | |
| 2010 | — | |
| 2009 | — | |
| 2008 | #12,553 | 5 |
| 2007 | #12,367 | 5 |
| 2006 | #6,460 | 12 |
| 2005 | #9,115 | 7 |
| 2004 | — | |
| 2003 | #7,831 | 8 |
| 2002 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | — | |
| 2000 | #7,416 | 8 |
| 1999 | #8,704 | 6 |
| 1998 | — | |
| 1997 | #9,265 | 5 |
| 1996 | — | |
| 1995 | #8,868 | 5 |
| 1994 | #6,372 | 8 |
| 1993 | — | |
| 1992 | #7,422 | 6 |
| 1991 | — | |
| 1990 | — | |
| 1989 | — | |
| 1988 | #7,270 | 5 |
| 1987 | #6,951 | 5 |
| 1986 | #6,721 | 5 |
| 1985 | #6,523 | 5 |
| 1984 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,907 | 7 |
| 1982 | #6,385 | 5 |
| 1981 | #5,468 | 6 |
| 1980 | #4,495 | 8 |
| 1979 | — | |
| 1978 | — | |
| 1977 | — | |
| 1976 | #5,587 | 5 |
| 1975 | — | |
| 1974 | — | |
| 1973 | — | |
| 1972 | — | |
| 1971 | #3,658 | 8 |
| 1970 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,404 | 5 |
| 1968 | — | |
| 1967 | — | |
| 1966 | — | |
| 1965 | — | |
| 1964 | — | |
| 1963 | — | |
| 1962 | — | |
| 1961 | — | |
| 1960 | — | |
| 1959 | — | |
| 1958 | — | |
| 1957 | — | |
| 1956 | #2,969 | 8 |
| 1955 | — | |
| 1954 | — | |
| 1953 | — | |
| 1952 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #3,714 | 5 |
| 1950 | — | |
| 1949 | — | |
| 1948 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,733 | 5 |
| 1946 | #3,525 | 5 |
| 1945 | — | |
| 1944 | — | |
| 1943 | — | |
| 1942 | — | |
| 1941 | — | |
| 1940 | — | |
| 1939 | #3,480 | 5 |
| 1938 | — | |
| 1937 | — | |
| 1936 | — | |
| 1935 | — | |
| 1934 | — | |
| 1933 | — | |
| 1932 | #3,776 | 5 |
| 1931 | #3,095 | 7 |
| 1930 | — | |
| 1929 | — | |
| 1928 | — | |
| 1927 | #2,523 | 11 |
| 1926 | #2,904 | 9 |
| 1925 | #3,741 | 6 |
| 1924 | #3,867 | 6 |
| 1923 | #3,467 | 7 |
| 1922 | #2,630 | 11 |
| 1921 | #3,869 | 6 |
| 1920 | #2,602 | 11 |
| 1919 | #2,385 | 12 |
| 1918 | #2,543 | 11 |
| 1917 | #2,091 | 14 |
| 1916 | #3,897 | 5 |
| 1915 | — | |
| 1914 | #2,915 | 6 |
| 1913 | — | |
| 1912 | #1,417 | 12 |
| 1911 | — | |
| 1910 | — | |
| 1909 | — | |
| 1908 | — | |
| 1907 | — | |
| 1906 | — | |
| 1905 | — | |
| 1904 | — | |
| 1903 | — | |
| 1902 | — | |
| 1901 | — | |
| 1900 | — | |
| 1899 | — | |
| 1898 | — | |
| 1897 | — | |
| 1896 | — | |
| 1895 | — | |
| 1894 | — | |
| 1893 | — | |
| 1892 | — | |
| 1891 | — | |
| 1890 | — | |
| 1889 | — | |
| 1888 | — | |
| 1887 | — | |
| 1886 | — | |
| 1885 | — | |
| 1884 | — | |
| 1883 | — | |
| 1882 | — | |
| 1881 | — | |
| 1880 | — | |
First appearance
1912
The first year at least five boys were named Osmond! It came in at #1,417, and was given to 12 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1913, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Osmond is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Osmond in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Osmond
Momentum · boys
Rising
- 23 spots since 2024 (#6,469 → #6,446)
- 1,621 spots since 2020 (#8,067 → #6,446)
- 620 spots since 2015 (#7,066 → #6,446)
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1912
- Peaked 1912 at #1,417 (12 births)
- Births halved by 1913, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 35,829
- Highest: 1 in 35,829 boys born in 1912 were named Osmond (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 131,390 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 2020s
- 17.2% of all boys named Osmond (81) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 60 | #1,417 (1912) | #2,541 |
| 1920s | 67 | #2,523 (1927) | #3,200 |
| 1930s | 17 | #3,095 (1931) | #3,450 |
| 1940s | 10 | #3,525 (1946) | #3,629 |
| 1950s | 18 | #2,969 (1956) | #3,472 |
| 1960s | 5 | #4,404 (1969) | #4,404 |
| 1970s | 13 | #3,658 (1971) | #4,623 |
| 1980s | 46 | #4,495 (1980) | #6,090 |
| 1990s | 30 | #6,372 (1994) | #8,126 |
| 2000s | 50 | #6,460 (2006) | #9,487 |
| 2010s | 73 | #6,053 (2016) | #7,535 |
| 2020s | 81 | #5,019 (2022) | #6,475 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Osmond ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: