Otha
- Last seen for girls in 1971 at #5,543
- Last seen for boys in 2018 at #9,670
- Given to boys 82.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1896 · 21 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 6,386since 1880
Otha over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | #9,670 | 7 | |
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | #12,108 | 5 | |
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | #12,274 | 5 | |
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | #11,037 | 6 | |
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | #12,055 | 5 | |
| 2005 | — | #10,151 | 6 | |
| 2004 | — | #8,143 | 8 | |
| 2003 | — | #7,245 | 9 | |
| 2002 | — | #7,643 | 8 | |
| 2001 | — | #6,445 | 10 | |
| 2000 | — | #8,209 | 7 | |
| 1999 | — | #9,912 | 5 | |
| 1998 | — | #7,560 | 7 | |
| 1997 | — | #4,960 | 12 | |
| 1996 | — | #4,613 | 13 | |
| 1995 | — | #4,052 | 15 | |
| 1994 | — | #4,803 | 12 | |
| 1993 | — | #4,697 | 12 | |
| 1992 | — | #4,872 | 11 | |
| 1991 | — | #4,760 | 11 | |
| 1990 | — | #3,309 | 18 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,325 | 17 | |
| 1988 | — | #3,079 | 17 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,725 | 19 | |
| 1986 | — | #3,268 | 14 | |
| 1985 | — | #3,070 | 15 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,956 | 15 | |
| 1983 | — | #2,272 | 22 | |
| 1982 | — | #2,207 | 23 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,086 | 25 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,110 | 25 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,104 | 24 | |
| 1978 | — | #1,794 | 29 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,858 | 27 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,646 | 32 | |
| 1975 | — | #1,787 | 27 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,659 | 29 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,817 | 24 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,418 | 36 | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | #1,378 | 38 |
| 1970 | — | #1,494 | 32 | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | #1,027 | 56 |
| 1968 | — | #1,282 | 35 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,312 | 33 | |
| 1966 | #6,564 | 5 | #1,116 | 44 |
| 1965 | #6,539 | 5 | #1,055 | 49 |
| 1964 | — | #1,114 | 47 | |
| 1963 | #5,296 | 7 | #1,100 | 48 |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | #930 | 66 |
| 1961 | — | #980 | 62 | |
| 1960 | #4,184 | 10 | #1,058 | 53 |
| 1959 | #5,031 | 7 | #1,156 | 45 |
| 1958 | #3,925 | 10 | #915 | 68 |
| 1957 | #3,930 | 10 | #880 | 74 |
| 1956 | #5,952 | 5 | #753 | 95 |
| 1955 | #3,225 | 13 | #801 | 83 |
| 1954 | #3,157 | 13 | #749 | 91 |
| 1953 | #2,812 | 15 | #731 | 96 |
| 1952 | #3,040 | 13 | #717 | 96 |
| 1951 | #3,106 | 12 | #702 | 97 |
| 1950 | #2,909 | 13 | #672 | 107 |
| 1949 | #2,410 | 17 | #649 | 111 |
| 1948 | #2,188 | 20 | #666 | 103 |
| 1947 | #1,993 | 24 | #643 | 115 |
| 1946 | #2,153 | 19 | #738 | 79 |
| 1945 | #2,339 | 14 | #586 | 106 |
| 1944 | #2,027 | 18 | #642 | 92 |
| 1943 | #2,695 | 12 | #639 | 100 |
| 1942 | #1,559 | 28 | #687 | 87 |
| 1941 | #1,501 | 27 | #648 | 88 |
| 1940 | #1,518 | 26 | #676 | 80 |
| 1939 | #1,731 | 20 | #594 | 95 |
| 1938 | #1,873 | 18 | #615 | 93 |
| 1937 | #1,580 | 23 | #621 | 87 |
| 1936 | #1,480 | 25 | #660 | 79 |
| 1935 | #1,606 | 22 | #624 | 89 |
| 1934 | #1,518 | 24 | #555 | 113 |
| 1933 | #1,513 | 24 | #614 | 89 |
| 1932 | #1,634 | 22 | #583 | 103 |
| 1931 | #2,307 | 13 | #565 | 108 |
| 1930 | #1,371 | 31 | #645 | 90 |
| 1929 | #1,419 | 29 | #550 | 115 |
| 1928 | #1,147 | 44 | #613 | 99 |
| 1927 | #1,194 | 42 | #579 | 114 |
| 1926 | #1,541 | 28 | #545 | 124 |
| 1925 | #1,225 | 40 | #566 | 120 |
| 1924 | #1,382 | 35 | #635 | 102 |
| 1923 | #1,231 | 40 | #625 | 104 |
| 1922 | #1,144 | 45 | #594 | 118 |
| 1921 | #1,148 | 44 | #534 | 136 |
| 1920 | #1,349 | 34 | #516 | 140 |
| 1919 | #1,745 | 22 | #559 | 114 |
| 1918 | #1,214 | 38 | #549 | 119 |
| 1917 | #1,126 | 40 | #501 | 131 |
| 1916 | #1,210 | 35 | #612 | 91 |
| 1915 | #1,173 | 34 | #535 | 108 |
| 1914 | #1,385 | 21 | #555 | 80 |
| 1913 | #1,229 | 21 | #492 | 78 |
| 1912 | #1,080 | 23 | #510 | 59 |
| 1911 | #1,171 | 15 | #533 | 31 |
| 1910 | #1,421 | 11 | #537 | 28 |
| 1909 | #1,471 | 9 | #449 | 32 |
| 1908 | #1,261 | 11 | #452 | 29 |
| 1907 | #945 | 16 | #448 | 27 |
| 1906 | #1,154 | 11 | #472 | 22 |
| 1905 | #1,011 | 14 | #477 | 22 |
| 1904 | #1,486 | 7 | #492 | 19 |
| 1903 | #1,137 | 10 | #550 | 16 |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | #490 | 19 |
| 1901 | #1,339 | 7 | #506 | 15 |
| 1900 | #1,106 | 12 | #518 | 21 |
| 1899 | #1,034 | 10 | #457 | 17 |
| 1898 | #1,379 | 7 | #573 | 14 |
| 1897 | — | #615 | 12 | |
| 1896 | #1,047 | 10 | #424 | 21 |
| 1895 | #1,202 | 8 | #556 | 14 |
| 1894 | #1,237 | 7 | #439 | 19 |
| 1893 | #1,023 | 9 | #705 | 9 |
| 1892 | — | #572 | 13 | |
| 1891 | — | #497 | 13 | |
| 1890 | #1,006 | 8 | #511 | 14 |
| 1889 | — | #581 | 11 | |
| 1888 | #1,276 | 5 | — | |
| 1887 | #1,036 | 6 | #679 | 8 |
| 1886 | — | #605 | 10 | |
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | #764 | 7 | |
| 1883 | — | #497 | 13 | |
| 1882 | — | #611 | 10 | |
| 1881 | — | #781 | 6 | |
| 1880 | — | #682 | 8 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Otha was already there! It came in at #682, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1885, when fewer than 5 boys a year got the name.
Where Otha is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more boys named Otha in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Otha
Momentum · boys
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2018
- Biggest jump: 266 spots in 1894
- Biggest drop: 267 spots in 1884
Rise & fade · boys
16 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1896 at #424 (21 births)
- Births halved by 1998, 102 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 79 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 79 yrs · run 1889–1958
Share of babies · boys
1 in 5,125
- Highest: 1 in 5,125 boys born in 1909 were named Otha (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 259,451 boys born in 2018 (0.00%)
- Its best rank, #424 in 1896, was only 1 in 5,694 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1920s
- 18.4% of all boys named Otha (1,172) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1894
- Mostly girls until 1893, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 73 | #497 (1883) | #650 |
| 1890s | 146 | #424 (1896) | #535 |
| 1900s | 222 | #448 (1907) | #485 |
| 1910s | 839 | #492 (1913) | #538 |
| 1920s | 1,172 | #516 (1920) | #576 |
| 1930s | 946 | #555 (1934) | #608 |
| 1940s | 961 | #586 (1945) | #657 |
| 1950s | 852 | #672 (1950) | #808 |
| 1960s | 493 | #930 (1962) | #1,097 |
| 1970s | 298 | #1,378 (1971) | #1,696 |
| 1980s | 192 | #2,086 (1981) | #2,710 |
| 1990s | 116 | #3,309 (1990) | #5,354 |
| 2000s | 59 | #6,445 (2001) | #8,866 |
| 2010s | 17 | #9,670 (2018) | #11,351 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Otha ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: