Ozie
- Last seen for girls in 1961 at #6,567
- Last seen for boys in 2010 at #12,231
- Given to girls 57.0% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1905 · 19 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 1,235since 1888
Ozie over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | #12,231 | 5 | |
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | — | — | ||
| 2004 | — | — | ||
| 2003 | — | — | ||
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | — | — | ||
| 2000 | — | — | ||
| 1999 | — | — | ||
| 1998 | — | — | ||
| 1997 | — | — | ||
| 1996 | — | — | ||
| 1995 | — | — | ||
| 1994 | — | — | ||
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #6,056 | 5 | |
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | #3,941 | 8 | |
| 1974 | — | #4,190 | 7 | |
| 1973 | — | #4,505 | 6 | |
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | #4,907 | 5 | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | #4,404 | 5 | |
| 1968 | — | #3,673 | 6 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | #3,948 | 5 | |
| 1965 | — | #2,780 | 9 | |
| 1964 | — | #4,039 | 5 | |
| 1963 | — | #3,646 | 6 | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #6,567 | 5 | #2,900 | 9 |
| 1960 | #4,437 | 9 | #2,210 | 14 |
| 1959 | — | #2,821 | 9 | |
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | #2,265 | 13 |
| 1957 | — | #3,257 | 7 | |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | #3,535 | 6 |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | #2,764 | 9 |
| 1954 | #3,490 | 11 | #1,762 | 19 |
| 1953 | #4,226 | 8 | #2,099 | 14 |
| 1952 | #4,483 | 7 | #3,373 | 6 |
| 1951 | #4,011 | 8 | #2,662 | 9 |
| 1950 | #4,315 | 7 | #2,321 | 11 |
| 1949 | #3,176 | 11 | #2,225 | 12 |
| 1948 | #2,974 | 12 | #2,027 | 14 |
| 1947 | #2,898 | 13 | #2,356 | 11 |
| 1946 | #3,994 | 7 | #2,030 | 13 |
| 1945 | #1,993 | 18 | #2,996 | 6 |
| 1944 | #2,511 | 13 | #1,988 | 13 |
| 1943 | #2,352 | 15 | #2,563 | 9 |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #3,212 | 6 |
| 1941 | #1,954 | 18 | #1,821 | 15 |
| 1940 | #1,591 | 24 | #1,802 | 15 |
| 1939 | #2,417 | 12 | #2,288 | 10 |
| 1938 | #1,945 | 17 | #1,741 | 16 |
| 1937 | #1,845 | 18 | #1,828 | 15 |
| 1936 | #2,386 | 12 | #1,723 | 16 |
| 1935 | #1,720 | 20 | #1,494 | 21 |
| 1934 | #1,603 | 22 | #2,393 | 10 |
| 1933 | #2,052 | 15 | #2,368 | 10 |
| 1932 | #1,520 | 25 | #1,584 | 20 |
| 1931 | #1,459 | 26 | #1,927 | 15 |
| 1930 | #2,306 | 14 | #1,428 | 26 |
| 1929 | #1,487 | 27 | #1,413 | 26 |
| 1928 | #1,589 | 26 | #1,902 | 17 |
| 1927 | #1,384 | 34 | #1,796 | 19 |
| 1926 | #1,414 | 32 | #1,846 | 18 |
| 1925 | #1,504 | 30 | #2,089 | 15 |
| 1924 | #1,188 | 44 | #1,414 | 28 |
| 1923 | #1,490 | 30 | #1,551 | 24 |
| 1922 | #1,144 | 45 | #1,644 | 22 |
| 1921 | #1,205 | 41 | #1,412 | 28 |
| 1920 | #1,282 | 36 | #1,747 | 20 |
| 1919 | #1,270 | 36 | #1,297 | 30 |
| 1918 | #1,537 | 27 | #1,256 | 31 |
| 1917 | #1,162 | 38 | #1,362 | 26 |
| 1916 | #1,127 | 39 | #1,594 | 20 |
| 1915 | #1,173 | 34 | #1,707 | 17 |
| 1914 | #1,262 | 24 | #2,101 | 10 |
| 1913 | #1,067 | 26 | #1,205 | 18 |
| 1912 | #1,080 | 23 | #1,268 | 14 |
| 1911 | #1,031 | 18 | #793 | 17 |
| 1910 | #1,030 | 18 | — | |
| 1909 | #1,015 | 16 | #1,083 | 8 |
| 1908 | #1,004 | 16 | #1,113 | 7 |
| 1907 | #1,206 | 11 | — | |
| 1906 | #1,043 | 13 | — | |
| 1905 | #848 | 19 | #1,091 | 6 |
| 1904 | #1,001 | 13 | #1,205 | 5 |
| 1903 | #862 | 16 | #783 | 9 |
| 1902 | #1,075 | 11 | #862 | 8 |
| 1901 | #1,136 | 9 | — | |
| 1900 | #1,106 | 12 | #902 | 9 |
| 1899 | #1,099 | 9 | — | |
| 1898 | #1,047 | 11 | — | |
| 1897 | #1,385 | 6 | — | |
| 1896 | #1,047 | 10 | — | |
| 1895 | #1,592 | 5 | — | |
| 1894 | #1,136 | 8 | — | |
| 1893 | #1,277 | 6 | — | |
| 1892 | #1,450 | 5 | — | |
| 1891 | #1,093 | 7 | — | |
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | #1,279 | 5 | — | |
| 1888 | #1,276 | 5 | — | |
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1888
The first year at least five girls were named Ozie! It came in at #1,276, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1888–1890, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Ozie is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Ozie in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Ozie
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 1961
- Biggest jump: 213 spots in 1903
- Biggest drop: 195 spots in 1906
Rise & fade · girls
17 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1888
- Peaked 1905 at #848 (19 births)
- Births halved by 1942, 37 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 2 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 2 yrs · 1903–1905
Share of babies · girls
1 in 15,348
- Highest: 1 in 15,348 girls born in 1905 were named Ozie (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 403,699 girls born in 1961 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
- 27.9% of all girls named Ozie (345) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 1957
- Mostly girls until 1956, mostly boys since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 10 | #1,276 (1888) | #1,278 |
| 1890s | 67 | #1,047 (1898) | #1,236 |
| 1900s | 136 | #848 (1905) | #1,030 |
| 1910s | 283 | #1,030 (1910) | #1,174 |
| 1920s | 345 | #1,144 (1922) | #1,369 |
| 1930s | 181 | #1,459 (1931) | #1,925 |
| 1940s | 137 | #1,591 (1940) | #2,757 |
| 1950s | 62 | #3,490 (1954) | #4,442 |
| 1960s | 14 | #4,437 (1960) | #5,502 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Ozie ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: