Pam

Last seen for girls in 1996 at #13,518 · Last seen for boys in 1962 at #3,305
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1959 · 3,677 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
33,125
since 1915

Pam over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Pam has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201952peak #125, 1959girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006——
2005——
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999——
1998——
1997——
1996#13,5185—
1995——
1994——
1993——
1992#13,3175—
1991#11,5096—
1990#7,88010—
1989#10,8476—
1988#5,89513—
1987#6,78810—
1986#7,1349—
1985#7,5638—
1984#4,31817—
1983#4,10918—
1982#3,34425—
1981#4,96314—
1980#3,41124—
1979#2,93129—
1978#2,62932—
1977#2,34138—
1976#2,38734—
1975#1,75653—
1974#1,38674—
1973#990120—
1972#738189—
1971#673230—
1970#560327—
1969#498382—
1968#418503—
1967#368600—
1966#297852—
1965#2461,218—
1964#1961,870—
1963#1662,384—
1962#1502,811#3,3057
1961#1443,083—
1960#1323,406#2,68510
1959#1253,677—
1958#1393,065—
1957#1841,959#3,5526
1956#302866—
1955#402473—
1954#490325—
1953#558245—
1952#607205—
1951#624191—
1950#546229—
1949#427343—
1948#327572—
1947#305667—
1946#320546—
1945#377349—
1944#393325—
1943#443282—
1942#620146—
1941#85872—
1940#96355—
1939#1,79719—
1938#1,87318—
1937#1,58023—
1936#2,15314—
1935#2,73110—
1934——
1933#2,27513—
1932#4,4115—
1931#3,4977—
1930#3,6587—
1929——
1928——
1927#3,8757—
1926——
1925——
1924——
1923——
1922——
1921——
1920——
1919——
1918——
1917——
1916——
1915#4,2745—
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1915

The first year at least five girls were named Pam! It came in at #4,274, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1915–1926, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Pam is popular in 1952

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNHWashington: #474 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,480 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: #222 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,377 girlsNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMNIllinois: #559 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 9,401 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWIMichigan: #510 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 8,081 girlsMINew York: #793 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 17,160 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedSDIowa: #412 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,687 girlsIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedINOhio: #415 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 5,937 girlsOHPennsylvania: #806 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 22,213 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #465 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 5,052 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedUTColorado: #331 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,709 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNEMissouri: #487 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,889 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: #322 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,000 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedARTennessee: #535 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,407 girlsTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMSAlabama: #526 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,365 girlsALGeorgia: #411 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 4,405 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedHITexas: #650 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 7,610 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Dakota#222 · 1 in 1,377
  2. New Mexico#322 · 1 in 2,000
  3. Colorado#331 · 1 in 2,709
  4. Georgia#411 · 1 in 4,405
  5. Iowa#412 · 1 in 5,687

Best ever in a state: #57 in Nevada, 1959.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Dakota#22251 in 1,377
New Mexico#32251 in 2,000
Colorado#33161 in 2,709
Georgia#411101 in 4,405
Iowa#41251 in 5,687
Ohio#415161 in 5,937
California#465261 in 5,052
Washington#47451 in 5,480
Missouri#48761 in 6,889
Michigan#510101 in 8,081
Alabama#52651 in 7,365
Tennessee#53551 in 7,407
Illinois#559101 in 9,401
Texas#650141 in 7,610
New York#79391 in 17,160
Pennsylvania#80651 in 22,213
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
North Carolina———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Pam
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1996
  • Biggest jump: 834 spots in 1940 (#1,797 → #963)
  • Biggest drop: 396 spots in 1974 (#990 → #1,386)
Rise & fade · girls
44 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1915
  • Peaked 1959 at #125 (3,677 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 34 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1940–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 550
  • Highest: 1 in 550 girls born in 1959 were named Pam (0.18%)
  • Latest: 1 in 350,601 girls born in 1996 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 51.6% of all girls named Pam (17,109) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1910s5#4,274 (1915)#4,274
1920s7#3,875 (1927)#3,875
1930s116#1,580 (1937)#2,664
1940s3,357#305 (1947)#503
1950s11,235#125 (1959)#398
1960s17,109#132 (1960)#262
1970s1,126#560 (1970)#1,639
1980s144#3,344 (1982)#5,837
1990s26#7,880 (1990)#11,556

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Pam in 1952

girls
#607
205 births · 1 in 9,046 girls

Top girls' names in 1952

  1. #1Linda67,082
  2. #2Mary65,629
  3. #3Patricia53,101
  4. #4Deborah49,811
  5. #5Susan41,348
  6. #6Barbara39,864
  7. #7Nancy31,739
  8. #8Karen28,956
  9. #9Debra26,832
  10. #10Sandra26,097
  11. #607Pam205
More about 1952

girls

1,854,335 girls got a published name in 1952; 1 in 9,046 of them was named Pam, which outranked 90.5% of the 6,389 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Pam
  1. #603Rosanna207
  2. #603Sydney207
  3. #606Iva206
  4. #607Pam205
  5. #607Felicia205
  6. #607Ingrid205
  7. #610Avis204
  8. #610Harriett204
  9. #610Marcie204

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1951
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,501Pandora#3,284 → #783
  2. ↑ 368Lise#1,314 → #946
  3. ↑ 353Vanessa#656 → #303
  4. ↑ 334Dorinda#1,170 → #836
  5. ↑ 332Mitzi#928 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 380Rhona#988 → #1,368
  2. ↓ 342Sharleen#765 → #1,107
  3. ↓ 270Enid#908 → #1,178
  4. ↓ 237Allyn#988 → #1,225
  5. ↓ 230Sheron#908 → #1,138

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1952 →