Pam

Last seen for girls in 1996 at #13,518 · Last seen for boys in 1962 at #3,305
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1959 · 3,677 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
33,125
since 1915

Pam over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Pam has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201963peak #125, 1959girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006——
2005——
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999——
1998——
1997——
1996#13,5185—
1995——
1994——
1993——
1992#13,3175—
1991#11,5096—
1990#7,88010—
1989#10,8476—
1988#5,89513—
1987#6,78810—
1986#7,1349—
1985#7,5638—
1984#4,31817—
1983#4,10918—
1982#3,34425—
1981#4,96314—
1980#3,41124—
1979#2,93129—
1978#2,62932—
1977#2,34138—
1976#2,38734—
1975#1,75653—
1974#1,38674—
1973#990120—
1972#738189—
1971#673230—
1970#560327—
1969#498382—
1968#418503—
1967#368600—
1966#297852—
1965#2461,218—
1964#1961,870—
1963#1662,384—
1962#1502,811#3,3057
1961#1443,083—
1960#1323,406#2,68510
1959#1253,677—
1958#1393,065—
1957#1841,959#3,5526
1956#302866—
1955#402473—
1954#490325—
1953#558245—
1952#607205—
1951#624191—
1950#546229—
1949#427343—
1948#327572—
1947#305667—
1946#320546—
1945#377349—
1944#393325—
1943#443282—
1942#620146—
1941#85872—
1940#96355—
1939#1,79719—
1938#1,87318—
1937#1,58023—
1936#2,15314—
1935#2,73110—
1934——
1933#2,27513—
1932#4,4115—
1931#3,4977—
1930#3,6587—
1929——
1928——
1927#3,8757—
1926——
1925——
1924——
1923——
1922——
1921——
1920——
1919——
1918——
1917——
1916——
1915#4,2745—
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1915

The first year at least five girls were named Pam! It came in at #4,274, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1915–1926, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Pam is popular in 1963

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: #141 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 451 girlsAKMaine: #269 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,864 girlsMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNHWashington: #152 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 625 girlsWAIdaho: #118 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 461 girlsIDMontana: #201 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 819 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #131 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 411 girlsNDMinnesota: #129 for girls · 66 births · 1 in 538 girlsMNIllinois: #178 for girls · 112 births · 1 in 885 girlsILWisconsin: #162 for girls · 49 births · 1 in 832 girlsWIMichigan: #140 for girls · 120 births · 1 in 667 girlsMINew York: #329 for girls · 68 births · 1 in 2,401 girlsNYMassachusetts: #285 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 2,464 girlsMARhode Island: #196 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,292 girlsRIOregon: #90 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 334 girlsORNevada: #80 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 254 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: #72 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 261 girlsSDIowa: #152 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 685 girlsIAIndiana: #122 for girls · 91 births · 1 in 517 girlsINOhio: #146 for girls · 143 births · 1 in 670 girlsOHPennsylvania: #203 for girls · 82 births · 1 in 1,241 girlsPANew Jersey: #252 for girls · 35 births · 1 in 1,643 girlsNJConnecticut: #298 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,430 girlsCTCalifornia: #174 for girls · 215 births · 1 in 810 girlsCAUtah: #90 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 331 girlsUTColorado: #128 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 471 girlsCONebraska: #106 for girls · 34 births · 1 in 407 girlsNEMissouri: #136 for girls · 72 births · 1 in 570 girlsMOKentucky: #152 for girls · 41 births · 1 in 736 girlsKYWest Virginia: #134 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 605 girlsWVVirginia: #156 for girls · 54 births · 1 in 737 girlsVAMaryland: #193 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,030 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedDEArizona: #142 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 519 girlsAZNew Mexico: #160 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 580 girlsNMKansas: #120 for girls · 39 births · 1 in 477 girlsKSArkansas: #111 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 473 girlsARTennessee: #95 for girls · 78 births · 1 in 445 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #112 for girls · 90 births · 1 in 515 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #146 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 650 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #174 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 802 girlsDCOklahoma: #106 for girls · 47 births · 1 in 428 girlsOKLouisiana: #176 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 786 girlsLAMississippi: #171 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 788 girlsMSAlabama: #130 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 605 girlsALGeorgia: #129 for girls · 83 births · 1 in 525 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedHITexas: #180 for girls · 135 births · 1 in 794 girlsTXFlorida: #141 for girls · 83 births · 1 in 585 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Dakota#72 · 1 in 261
  2. Nevada#80 · 1 in 254
  3. Utah#90 · 1 in 331
  4. Oregon#90 · 1 in 334
  5. Tennessee#95 · 1 in 445

Best ever in a state: #57 in Nevada, 1959.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Dakota#72251 in 261
Nevada#80121 in 254
Oregon#90431 in 334
Utah#90301 in 331
Tennessee#95781 in 445
Nebraska#106341 in 407
Oklahoma#106471 in 428
Arkansas#111371 in 473
North Carolina#112901 in 515
Idaho#118121 in 461
Kansas#120391 in 477
Indiana#122911 in 517
Colorado#128401 in 471
Georgia#129831 in 525
Minnesota#129661 in 538
Alabama#130531 in 605
North Dakota#131141 in 411
West Virginia#134251 in 605
Missouri#136721 in 570
Michigan#1401201 in 667
Alaska#14161 in 451
Florida#141831 in 585
Arizona#142291 in 519
Ohio#1461431 in 670
South Carolina#146381 in 650
Iowa#152371 in 685
Kentucky#152411 in 736
Washington#152411 in 625
Virginia#156541 in 737
New Mexico#160191 in 580
Wisconsin#162491 in 832
Mississippi#171301 in 788
California#1742151 in 810
District of Columbia#174161 in 802
Louisiana#176461 in 786
Illinois#1781121 in 885
Texas#1801351 in 794
Maryland#193291 in 1,030
Rhode Island#19661 in 1,292
Montana#20171 in 819
Pennsylvania#203821 in 1,241
New Jersey#252351 in 1,643
Maine#26951 in 1,864
Massachusetts#285211 in 2,464
Connecticut#298101 in 2,430
New York#329681 in 2,401
Delaware———
Hawaii———
New Hampshire———
Vermont———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Pam
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1996
  • Biggest jump: 834 spots in 1940 (#1,797 → #963)
  • Biggest drop: 396 spots in 1974 (#990 → #1,386)
Rise & fade · girls
44 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1915
  • Peaked 1959 at #125 (3,677 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 34 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1940–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 550
  • Highest: 1 in 550 girls born in 1959 were named Pam (0.18%)
  • Latest: 1 in 350,601 girls born in 1996 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 51.6% of all girls named Pam (17,109) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1910s5#4,274 (1915)#4,274
1920s7#3,875 (1927)#3,875
1930s116#1,580 (1937)#2,664
1940s3,357#305 (1947)#503
1950s11,235#125 (1959)#398
1960s17,109#132 (1960)#262
1970s1,126#560 (1970)#1,639
1980s144#3,344 (1982)#5,837
1990s26#7,880 (1990)#11,556

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Pam in 1963

girls
#166
2,384 births · 1 in 809 girls

Top girls' names in 1963

  1. #1Lisa56,047
  2. #2Mary41,546
  3. #3Susan33,991
  4. #4Karen32,492
  5. #5Linda27,727
  6. #6Donna25,405
  7. #7Patricia25,374
  8. #8Lori23,899
  9. #9Sandra21,621
  10. #10Cynthia21,589
  11. #166Pam2,384
More about 1963

girls

1,927,507 girls got a published name in 1963; 1 in 809 of them was named Pam, which outranked 97.8% of the 7,661 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Pam
  1. #163Norma2,458
  2. #164Shari2,455
  3. #165Darla2,391
  4. #166Pam2,384
  5. #167Tonya2,369
  6. #168Carmen2,347
  7. #169Roberta2,322
Biggest movers since 1962
Risers
  1. ↑ 631Zena#1,323 → #692
  2. ↑ 623Zina#992 → #369
  3. ↑ 540Trisha#1,020 → #480
  4. ↑ 457Shirl#1,304 → #847
  5. ↑ 396Glynis#992 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,195Marnita#727 → #1,922
  2. ↓ 255Velvet#623 → #878
  3. ↓ 235Delphine#904 → #1,139
  4. ↓ 224Rosita#934 → #1,158
  5. ↓ 197Lindy#885 → #1,082

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1963 →