Pam

Last seen for girls in 1996 at #13,518 · Last seen for boys in 1962 at #3,305
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1959 · 3,677 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
33,125
since 1915

Pam over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Pam has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201968peak #125, 1959girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006——
2005——
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999——
1998——
1997——
1996#13,5185—
1995——
1994——
1993——
1992#13,3175—
1991#11,5096—
1990#7,88010—
1989#10,8476—
1988#5,89513—
1987#6,78810—
1986#7,1349—
1985#7,5638—
1984#4,31817—
1983#4,10918—
1982#3,34425—
1981#4,96314—
1980#3,41124—
1979#2,93129—
1978#2,62932—
1977#2,34138—
1976#2,38734—
1975#1,75653—
1974#1,38674—
1973#990120—
1972#738189—
1971#673230—
1970#560327—
1969#498382—
1968#418503—
1967#368600—
1966#297852—
1965#2461,218—
1964#1961,870—
1963#1662,384—
1962#1502,811#3,3057
1961#1443,083—
1960#1323,406#2,68510
1959#1253,677—
1958#1393,065—
1957#1841,959#3,5526
1956#302866—
1955#402473—
1954#490325—
1953#558245—
1952#607205—
1951#624191—
1950#546229—
1949#427343—
1948#327572—
1947#305667—
1946#320546—
1945#377349—
1944#393325—
1943#443282—
1942#620146—
1941#85872—
1940#96355—
1939#1,79719—
1938#1,87318—
1937#1,58023—
1936#2,15314—
1935#2,73110—
1934——
1933#2,27513—
1932#4,4115—
1931#3,4977—
1930#3,6587—
1929——
1928——
1927#3,8757—
1926——
1925——
1924——
1923——
1922——
1921——
1920——
1919——
1918——
1917——
1916——
1915#4,2745—
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1915

The first year at least five girls were named Pam! It came in at #4,274, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1915–1926, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Pam is popular in 1968

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNHWashington: #367 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,351 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #299 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,343 girlsMNIllinois: #436 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 3,486 girlsILWisconsin: #251 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,809 girlsWIMichigan: #405 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 3,473 girlsMINew York: #690 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 7,569 girlsNYMassachusetts: #565 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,331 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedRIOregon: #297 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,638 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedSDIowa: #240 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,436 girlsIAIndiana: #314 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 2,094 girlsINOhio: #426 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 3,934 girlsOHPennsylvania: #462 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 4,679 girlsPANew Jersey: #619 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,894 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #484 for girls · 45 births · 1 in 3,418 girlsCAUtah: #208 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 903 girlsUTColorado: #313 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,729 girlsCONebraska: #270 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,656 girlsNEMissouri: #284 for girls · 19 births · 1 in 1,731 girlsMOKentucky: #318 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,396 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWVVirginia: #512 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 5,492 girlsVAMaryland: #515 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,056 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedDEArizona: #367 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,846 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNMKansas: #354 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,301 girlsKSArkansas: #346 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,166 girlsARTennessee: #266 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,715 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #372 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 3,021 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #290 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,692 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #394 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,664 girlsOKLouisiana: #357 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 2,164 girlsLAMississippi: #305 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 1,804 girlsMSAlabama: #380 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,611 girlsALGeorgia: #246 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 1,448 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedHITexas: #569 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 4,473 girlsTXFlorida: #295 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 1,690 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Utah#208 · 1 in 903
  2. Iowa#240 · 1 in 1,436
  3. Georgia#246 · 1 in 1,448
  4. Wisconsin#251 · 1 in 1,809
  5. Tennessee#266 · 1 in 1,715

Best ever in a state: #57 in Nevada, 1959.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Utah#208101 in 903
Iowa#240141 in 1,436
Georgia#246261 in 1,448
Wisconsin#251181 in 1,809
Tennessee#266171 in 1,715
Nebraska#27061 in 1,656
Missouri#284191 in 1,731
South Carolina#290121 in 1,692
Florida#295251 in 1,690
Oregon#29781 in 1,638
Minnesota#299121 in 2,343
Mississippi#305101 in 1,804
Colorado#31391 in 1,729
Indiana#314191 in 2,094
Kentucky#318101 in 2,396
Arkansas#34661 in 2,166
Kansas#35461 in 2,301
Louisiana#357141 in 2,164
Arizona#36771 in 1,846
Washington#367101 in 2,351
North Carolina#372131 in 3,021
Alabama#380101 in 2,611
Oklahoma#39461 in 2,664
Michigan#405201 in 3,473
Ohio#426211 in 3,934
Illinois#436241 in 3,486
Pennsylvania#462181 in 4,679
California#484451 in 3,418
Virginia#51261 in 5,492
Maryland#51551 in 5,056
Massachusetts#56551 in 8,331
Texas#569211 in 4,473
New Jersey#61971 in 6,894
New York#690181 in 7,569
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Maine———
Montana———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Pam
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1996
  • Biggest jump: 834 spots in 1940 (#1,797 → #963)
  • Biggest drop: 396 spots in 1974 (#990 → #1,386)
Rise & fade · girls
44 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1915
  • Peaked 1959 at #125 (3,677 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 34 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1940–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 550
  • Highest: 1 in 550 girls born in 1959 were named Pam (0.18%)
  • Latest: 1 in 350,601 girls born in 1996 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 51.6% of all girls named Pam (17,109) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1910s5#4,274 (1915)#4,274
1920s7#3,875 (1927)#3,875
1930s116#1,580 (1937)#2,664
1940s3,357#305 (1947)#503
1950s11,235#125 (1959)#398
1960s17,109#132 (1960)#262
1970s1,126#560 (1970)#1,639
1980s144#3,344 (1982)#5,837
1990s26#7,880 (1990)#11,556

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Pam in 1968

girls
#418
503 births · 1 in 3,261 girls

Top girls' names in 1968

  1. #1Lisa49,534
  2. #2Michelle33,223
  3. #3Kimberly31,906
  4. #4Jennifer26,853
  5. #5Melissa21,733
  6. #6Mary21,727
  7. #7Angela20,670
  8. #8Tammy20,058
  9. #9Karen19,560
  10. #10Susan19,503
  11. #418Pam503
More about 1968

girls

1,640,389 girls got a published name in 1968; 1 in 3,261 of them was named Pam, which outranked 94.9% of the 8,198 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Pam
  1. #415Jennie507
  2. #416Angel504
  3. #416Josette504
  4. #418Pam503
  5. #418Anissa503
  6. #420Gena502
  7. #420Kimberlee502
  8. #422Bethany501

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1967
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,132Coretta#3,656 → #524
  2. ↑ 1,257Tamika#1,980 → #723
  3. ↑ 1,150Tamiko#1,702 → #552
  4. ↑ 607Chantel#1,348 → #741
  5. ↑ 490Chantal#1,441 → #951
Fallers
  1. ↓ 602Wende#857 → #1,459
  2. ↓ 545Zina#959 → #1,504
  3. ↓ 341Evonne#970 → #1,311
  4. ↓ 294Portia#902 → #1,196
  5. ↓ 285Mariann#973 → #1,258

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1968 →