Pam

Last seen for girls in 1996 at #13,518 · Last seen for boys in 1962 at #3,305
Given to girls 99.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1959 · 3,677 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
33,125
since 1915

Pam over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Pam has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201969peak #125, 1959girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025——
2024——
2023——
2022——
2021——
2020——
2019——
2018——
2017——
2016——
2015——
2014——
2013——
2012——
2011——
2010——
2009——
2008——
2007——
2006——
2005——
2004——
2003——
2002——
2001——
2000——
1999——
1998——
1997——
1996#13,5185—
1995——
1994——
1993——
1992#13,3175—
1991#11,5096—
1990#7,88010—
1989#10,8476—
1988#5,89513—
1987#6,78810—
1986#7,1349—
1985#7,5638—
1984#4,31817—
1983#4,10918—
1982#3,34425—
1981#4,96314—
1980#3,41124—
1979#2,93129—
1978#2,62932—
1977#2,34138—
1976#2,38734—
1975#1,75653—
1974#1,38674—
1973#990120—
1972#738189—
1971#673230—
1970#560327—
1969#498382—
1968#418503—
1967#368600—
1966#297852—
1965#2461,218—
1964#1961,870—
1963#1662,384—
1962#1502,811#3,3057
1961#1443,083—
1960#1323,406#2,68510
1959#1253,677—
1958#1393,065—
1957#1841,959#3,5526
1956#302866—
1955#402473—
1954#490325—
1953#558245—
1952#607205—
1951#624191—
1950#546229—
1949#427343—
1948#327572—
1947#305667—
1946#320546—
1945#377349—
1944#393325—
1943#443282—
1942#620146—
1941#85872—
1940#96355—
1939#1,79719—
1938#1,87318—
1937#1,58023—
1936#2,15314—
1935#2,73110—
1934——
1933#2,27513—
1932#4,4115—
1931#3,4977—
1930#3,6587—
1929——
1928——
1927#3,8757—
1926——
1925——
1924——
1923——
1922——
1921——
1920——
1919——
1918——
1917——
1916——
1915#4,2745—
1914——
1913——
1912——
1911——
1910——
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906——
1905——
1904——
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898——
1897——
1896——
1895——
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1915

The first year at least five girls were named Pam! It came in at #4,274, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1915–1926, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Pam is popular in 1969

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNHWashington: #367 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,431 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #260 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 1,797 girlsMNIllinois: #415 for girls · 27 births · 1 in 3,140 girlsILWisconsin: #287 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,169 girlsWIMichigan: #512 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 5,123 girlsMINew York: #982 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 13,896 girlsNYMassachusetts: #545 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 7,043 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedSDIowa: #431 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,074 girlsIAIndiana: #356 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 2,728 girlsINOhio: #478 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 4,958 girlsOHPennsylvania: #552 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 6,439 girlsPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #688 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 6,395 girlsCAUtah: #337 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,880 girlsUTColorado: #371 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,331 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNEMissouri: #382 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,117 girlsMOKentucky: #456 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,114 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedVAMaryland: #468 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,178 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedDEArizona: #399 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,239 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedNMKansas: #321 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,047 girlsKSArkansas: #399 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,704 girlsARTennessee: #342 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,532 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #390 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 3,320 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #328 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,018 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #400 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,776 girlsOKLouisiana: #424 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 2,799 girlsLAMississippi: #260 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,432 girlsMSAlabama: #340 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,179 girlsALGeorgia: #297 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,818 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Pam, so not publishedHITexas: #647 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 5,585 girlsTXFlorida: #609 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,547 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Mississippi#260 · 1 in 1,432
  2. Minnesota#260 · 1 in 1,797
  3. Wisconsin#287 · 1 in 2,169
  4. Georgia#297 · 1 in 1,818
  5. Kansas#321 · 1 in 2,047

Best ever in a state: #57 in Nevada, 1959.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Minnesota#260161 in 1,797
Mississippi#260131 in 1,432
Wisconsin#287151 in 2,169
Georgia#297211 in 1,818
Kansas#32171 in 2,047
South Carolina#328101 in 2,018
Utah#33751 in 1,880
Alabama#340121 in 2,179
Tennessee#342121 in 2,532
Indiana#356151 in 2,728
Washington#367101 in 2,431
Colorado#37171 in 2,331
Missouri#382111 in 3,117
North Carolina#390121 in 3,320
Arizona#39961 in 2,239
Arkansas#39951 in 2,704
Oklahoma#40061 in 2,776
Illinois#415271 in 3,140
Louisiana#424111 in 2,799
Iowa#43151 in 4,074
Kentucky#45661 in 4,114
Maryland#46861 in 4,178
Ohio#478171 in 4,958
Michigan#512141 in 5,123
Massachusetts#54561 in 7,043
Pennsylvania#552131 in 6,439
Florida#60981 in 5,547
Texas#647181 in 5,585
California#688251 in 6,395
New York#982101 in 13,896
Alaska———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Maine———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Vermont———
Virginia———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Pam
Momentum · girls
Faded out
  • Not published in 2025; last seen 1996
  • Biggest jump: 834 spots in 1940 (#1,797 → #963)
  • Biggest drop: 396 spots in 1974 (#990 → #1,386)
Rise & fade · girls
44 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1915
  • Peaked 1959 at #125 (3,677 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 6 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 34 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 34 yrs · run 1940–1973
Share of babies · girls
1 in 550
  • Highest: 1 in 550 girls born in 1959 were named Pam (0.18%)
  • Latest: 1 in 350,601 girls born in 1996 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1960s
  • 51.6% of all girls named Pam (17,109) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1910s5#4,274 (1915)#4,274
1920s7#3,875 (1927)#3,875
1930s116#1,580 (1937)#2,664
1940s3,357#305 (1947)#503
1950s11,235#125 (1959)#398
1960s17,109#132 (1960)#262
1970s1,126#560 (1970)#1,639
1980s144#3,344 (1982)#5,837
1990s26#7,880 (1990)#11,556

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Pam in 1969

girls
#498
382 births · 1 in 4,416 girls

Top girls' names in 1969

  1. #1Lisa45,028
  2. #2Michelle34,319
  3. #3Jennifer33,705
  4. #4Kimberly33,077
  5. #5Melissa23,018
  6. #6Amy21,464
  7. #7Angela21,060
  8. #8Mary19,850
  9. #9Tammy19,053
  10. #10Laura17,922
  11. #498Pam382
More about 1969

girls

1,687,016 girls got a published name in 1969; 1 in 4,416 of them was named Pam, which outranked 94.3% of the 8,708 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 15.9% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Pam
  1. #495Bernice385
  2. #496Isabel384
  3. #496Ursula384
  4. #498Pam382
  5. #499Alyssa380
  6. #499Lashawn380
  7. #501Claire377
Biggest movers since 1968
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,462Shani#2,126 → #664
  2. ↑ 1,203Julissa#2,164 → #961
  3. ↑ 1,133Chelsea#1,834 → #701
  4. ↑ 667Latasha#1,519 → #852
  5. ↑ 549Britt#1,519 → #970
Fallers
  1. ↓ 455Tamiko#552 → #1,007
  2. ↓ 345Alesia#697 → #1,042
  3. ↓ 324Vickey#966 → #1,290
  4. ↓ 308Bettina#746 → #1,054
  5. ↓ 293Cammie#846 → #1,139

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1969 →