Pamela

#2,239 for girls in 2025, 82 births · Last seen for boys in 2004 at #11,356
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1953 · 25,760 births
Debut · girls
5 births
In top 100 · girls
39 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
595,076
since 1895

Pamela over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202009peak #10, 1953girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,23982—
2024#2,15088—
2023#1,934102—
2022#2,03495—
2021#1,801112—
2020#1,668123—
2019#1,495146—
2018#1,585136—
2017#1,451155—
2016#1,300184—
2015#1,399167—
2014#1,289185—
2013#1,171205—
2012#1,148215—
2011#961266—
2010#983258—
2009#842331—
2008#671455—
2007#582516—
2006#532568—
2005#618457—
2004#527540#11,3565
2003#446673—
2002#517530—
2001#483578—
2000#457607—
1999#421655#9,9125
1998#388714—
1997#359770—
1996#341814—
1995#385687—
1994#352748—
1993#324806#6,8167
1992#301920#8,4355
1991#2591,085#6,5197
1990#2381,194#4,67311
1989#1991,331#4,27112
1988#1841,510#5,7517
1987#1531,784#3,95911
1986#1382,016#5,3327
1985#1162,468#3,80511
1984#1042,642#4,5528
1983#913,029#3,88410
1982#823,546#2,83116
1981#763,881#3,41212
1980#863,533#4,9407
1979#903,365#3,16813
1978#1092,690#4,1578
1977#1022,830#2,91014
1976#843,364#2,24520
1975#704,177#2,45017
1974#545,272#2,05021
1973#475,813#2,03620
1972#347,472#1,96621
1971#2810,149#1,27243
1970#2612,907#1,15951
1969#2413,355#98960
1968#2014,031#1,20640
1967#1715,368#1,04349
1966#1516,249#1,21638
1965#1217,467#1,27136
1964#1119,823#1,21940
1963#1420,593#94763
1962#1321,270#1,31135
1961#1521,691#1,13648
1960#1422,092#1,05853
1959#1224,714#1,26538
1958#1125,279#1,00158
1957#1225,015#1,10048
1956#1226,928#1,19341
1955#1226,690#1,21938
1954#1227,361#1,22737
1953#1025,760#1,33132
1952#1720,879#1,34731
1951#1618,570#1,43027
1950#1716,202#1,39527
1949#2115,132#1,54423
1948#2214,281#1,37828
1947#2812,398#1,39428
1946#349,367#1,40925
1945#426,169#1,85214
1944#446,204#1,40023
1943#544,839#1,52921
1942#1062,632#2,5239
1941#1551,468#2,8727
1940#251631—
1939#347337—
1938#369314—
1937#399264—
1936#434220—
1935#458194—
1934#535147—
1933#629108—
1932#69296—
1931#66799—
1930#71794—
1929#666110—
1928#703100—
1927#91167—
1926#84376—
1925#86175—
1924#1,09651—
1923#1,07650—
1922#1,26938—
1921#1,40933—
1920#1,58427—
1919#1,74522—
1918#2,02918—
1917#1,99617—
1916#2,49812—
1915#1,57122—
1914#1,89613—
1913#1,46516—
1912#1,29717—
1911#1,7928—
1910#2,3985—
1909——
1908——
1907——
1906#1,7276—
1905——
1904#1,8775—
1903——
1902——
1901——
1900——
1899——
1898#1,5026—
1897——
1896——
1895#1,5925—
1894——
1893——
1892——
1891——
1890——
1889——
1888——
1887——
1886——
1885——
1884——
1883——
1882——
1881——
1880——
First appearance
1895

The first year at least five girls were named Pamela! It came in at #1,592, and was given to 5 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1895–1897, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.

Where Pamela is popular in 2009

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedNHWashington: #1,094 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,272 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedMNIllinois: #899 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 5,270 girlsILWisconsin: #663 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,501 girlsWIMichigan: #883 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 5,343 girlsMINew York: #679 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 3,645 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedORNevada: #468 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,910 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #1,419 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 10,926 girlsPANew Jersey: #566 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,948 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #634 for girls · 61 births · 1 in 3,578 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedUTColorado: #806 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,974 girlsCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedWVVirginia: #995 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 6,116 girlsVAMaryland: #555 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,747 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedDEArizona: #836 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 4,190 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,091 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,631 girlsNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedALGeorgia: #615 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 2,984 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Pamela, so not publishedHITexas: #535 for girls · 60 births · 1 in 2,778 girlsTXFlorida: #875 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 5,146 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Nevada#468 · 1 in 1,910
  2. Texas#535 · 1 in 2,778
  3. Maryland#555 · 1 in 2,747
  4. New Jersey#566 · 1 in 2,948
  5. Georgia#615 · 1 in 2,984

Best ever in a state: #3 in West Virginia, 1959.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Nevada#46861 in 1,910
Texas#535601 in 2,778
Maryland#55591 in 2,747
New Jersey#566131 in 2,948
Georgia#615171 in 2,984
California#634611 in 3,578
Wisconsin#66371 in 3,501
New York#679261 in 3,645
Colorado#80661 in 3,974
Arizona#83681 in 4,190
Florida#875161 in 5,146
Michigan#88381 in 5,343
Illinois#899121 in 5,270
Virginia#99561 in 6,116
North Carolina#1,09171 in 6,631
Washington#1,09451 in 6,272
Pennsylvania#1,41951 in 10,926
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
West Virginia———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Pamela
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 89 spots since 2024 (#2,150 → #2,239)
  • 571 spots since 2020 (#1,668 → #2,239)
  • 840 spots since 2015 (#1,399 → #2,239)
  • Biggest jump: 235 spots in 1925 (#1,096 → #861)
  • Biggest drop: 187 spots in 2012 (#961 → #1,148)
Rise & fade · girls
58 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1895
  • Peaked 1953 at #10 (25,760 births)
  • Births halved by 1971, 18 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 1 yr
  • Top 10: 1 yr · 1953
  • Top 100: 39 yrs · run 1943–1976
  • Top 1,000: 87 yrs · run 1925–2011
Share of babies · girls
1 in 71
  • Highest: 1 in 71 girls born in 1954 were named Pamela (1.4%)
  • Latest: 1 in 19,601 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
  • Its best rank, #10 in 1953, was only 1 in 73 (1.4%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1950s
  • 39.9% of all girls named Pamela (237,398) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1890s11#1,502 (1898)#1,547
1900s11#1,727 (1906)#1,802
1910s150#1,297 (1912)#1,869
1920s627#666 (1929)#1,042
1930s1,873#347 (1939)#525
1940s73,121#21 (1949)#76
1950s237,398#10 (1953)#13
1960s181,939#11 (1964)#16
1970s58,039#26 (1970)#64
1980s25,740#76 (1981)#123
1990s8,393#238 (1990)#337
2000s5,255#446 (2003)#568
2010s1,917#961 (2011)#1,278
2020s602#1,668 (2020)#1,971

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Pamela in 2009

girls
#842
331 births · 1 in 5,550 girls

Top girls' names in 2009

  1. #1Isabella22,321
  2. #2Emma17,910
  3. #3Olivia17,444
  4. #4Sophia16,951
  5. #5Ava15,877
  6. #6Emily15,366
  7. #7Madison15,257
  8. #8Abigail14,401
  9. #9Chloe11,922
  10. #10Mia11,438
  11. #842Pamela331
More about 2009

girls

1,837,114 girls got a published name in 2009; 1 in 5,550 of them was named Pamela, which outranked 95.8% of the 20,199 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.6% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Pamela
  1. #839Kourtney334
  2. #840Edith333
  3. #841Angeline332
  4. #842Pamela331
  5. #842Adelynn331
  6. #842Jacey331
  7. #842Janice331
  8. #847Raelynn330
  9. #848Laylah329
  10. #848Mylee329

Tied with 4 names at #842; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2008
Risers
  1. ↑ 4,137Taraji#5,013 → #876
  2. ↑ 2,107Bristol#2,773 → #666
  3. ↑ 836Analia#1,167 → #331
  4. ↑ 773Harlow#1,677 → #904
  5. ↑ 610Maliah#1,405 → #795
Fallers
  1. ↓ 1,450Dayami#754 → #2,204
  2. ↓ 953Mareli#723 → #1,676
  3. ↓ 773Mylie#839 → #1,612
  4. ↓ 517Marely#334 → #851
  5. ↓ 515Hillary#722 → #1,237

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2009 →