Parker

#106 for girls in 2025, 2,536 births · #102 for boys in 2025, 3,477 births
Given to boys 79.9% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
2015 · 5,418 births
Debut · boys
14 births
In top 100 · boys
16 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · boys
130,941
since 1880

Parker over time

girlsboys

Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201919peak #72, 2015girlsat peakboys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#1062,536#1023,477
2024#1042,525#973,616
2023#1222,296#913,807
2022#1152,409#943,861
2021#1152,420#933,845
2020#1282,148#953,814
2019#1431,977#983,907
2018#1621,764#964,007
2017#2071,494#904,382
2016#2171,482#874,730
2015#2281,447#725,418
2014#2331,406#735,720
2013#2671,202#745,672
2012#3171,024#815,370
2011#366873#795,296
2010#465652#854,732
2009#503600#964,626
2008#505617#1034,321
2007#592505#1084,077
2006#636453#1163,667
2005#710384#1193,404
2004#660414#1313,063
2003#797310#1253,186
2002#766315#1263,099
2001#758316#1233,187
2000#866254#1273,099
1999#867248#1243,011
1998#1,081179#1422,629
1997#1,312132#1502,298
1996#1,58398#1791,797
1995#1,90073#2161,368
1994#2,41253#2381,250
1993#2,35154#2461,156
1992#2,43353#2561,118
1991#3,09736#293883
1990#4,69420#342724
1989#5,54515#405529
1988#6,27712#441418
1987#5,07415#485333
1986#5,45913#471338
1985#5,07714#491310
1984#5,89911#554242
1983#7,3128#587209
1982#9,2376#706152
1981#6,8049#750135
1980#10,3925#758134
1979—#751133
1978#9,7505#816109
1977#9,6525#1,06466
1976—#1,26748
1975—#1,32243
1974—#1,69228
1973—#1,51432
1972—#1,19647
1971—#1,00765
1970#5,8188#1,04361
1969—#1,06453
1968—#91063
1967—#1,21538
1966—#1,21638
1965—#94860
1964—#1,05951
1963—#1,02055
1962—#1,01357
1961—#1,05255
1960—#1,04554
1959—#1,02656
1958—#1,22240
1957—#92567
1956—#1,01954
1955—#1,05451
1954—#95260
1953—#95057
1952—#91560
1951—#89262
1950—#87861
1949—#96751
1948—#82169
1947—#79475
1946—#86957
1945—#86452
1944—#99143
1943—#82863
1942—#93350
1941—#85854
1940—#77064
1939—#77062
1938—#82556
1937—#92246
1936—#85351
1935—#85853
1934—#80859
1933—#79959
1932—#76967
1931—#84156
1930—#95850
1929—#66685
1928—#74374
1927—#74776
1926—#84261
1925—#75576
1924—#75278
1923—#77772
1922—#75976
1921—#84966
1920—#84664
1919—#63392
1918—#69282
1917—#76567
1916—#78162
1915—#68172
1914—#68755
1913—#61152
1912—#73534
1911—#85615
1910—#78215
1909—#65317
1908—#74413
1907—#9998
1906—#59016
1905—#63614
1904—#41725
1903—#55016
1902—#8628
1901—#7279
1900—#60317
1899—#7149
1898—#57314
1897—#68110
1896—#51816
1895—#52915
1894—#41920
1893—#53813
1892—#68810
1891—#45615
1890—#56612
1889—#52513
1888—#60911
1887—#46114
1886—#57811
1885—#8366
1884—#6639
1883—#6778
1882—#48914
1881—#50312
1880—#48214
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Parker was already there! It came in at #482, and was given to 14 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1883–1885, when fewer than 10 boys a year got the name.

Where Parker is popular in 1919

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedAKMaine: #145 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 757 boysMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedMNIllinois: #487 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 9,861 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedMINew York: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNYMassachusetts: #273 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 4,330 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedMOKentucky: #390 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,799 boysKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedWVVirginia: #335 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,631 boysVAMaryland: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #376 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 2,981 boysLAMississippi: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedMSAlabama: #418 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 4,247 boysALGeorgia: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 boys named Parker, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Maine#145 · 1 in 757
  2. Massachusetts#273 · 1 in 4,330
  3. Virginia#335 · 1 in 3,631
  4. Louisiana#376 · 1 in 2,981
  5. Kentucky#390 · 1 in 3,799

Best ever in a state: #3 in Wyoming, 2011.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Maine#14571 in 757
Massachusetts#27371 in 4,330
Virginia#33561 in 3,631
Louisiana#37661 in 2,981
Kentucky#39061 in 3,799
Alabama#41861 in 4,247
Illinois#48751 in 9,861
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Georgia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
New York———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Parker
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
  • 5 spots since 2024 (#97 → #102)
  • 7 spots since 2020 (#95 → #102)
  • 30 spots since 2015 (#72 → #102)
  • Biggest jump: 312 spots in 1903 (#862 → #550)
  • Biggest drop: 409 spots in 1907 (#590 → #999)
Rise & fade · boys
135 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 2015 at #72 (5,418 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Top 100 for 16 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: 16 yrs · run 2009–2024
  • Top 1,000: 126 yrs · run 1880–1954
Share of babies · boys
1 in 333
  • Highest: 1 in 333 boys born in 2013 were named Parker (0.30%)
  • Latest: 1 in 491 boys born in 2025 (0.20%)
  • Its best rank, #72 in 2015, was only 1 in 354 (0.28%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
  • 37.6% of all boys named Parker (49,234) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
  • The majority has never changed
all girlsall boys
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s112#461 (1887)#582
1890s134#419 (1894)#568
1900s143#417 (1904)#678
1910s546#611 (1913)#722
1920s728#666 (1929)#774
1930s559#769 (1932)#840
1940s578#770 (1940)#870
1950s568#878 (1950)#983
1960s524#910 (1968)#1,054
1970s632#751 (1979)#1,167
1980s2,800#405 (1989)#565
1990s16,234#124 (1999)#219
2000s35,729#96 (2009)#117
2010s49,234#72 (2015)#84
2020s22,420#91 (2023)#95

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Parker in 1919

boys
#633
92 births · 1 in 10,654 boys

Top boys' names in 1919

  1. #1John53,522
  2. #2William43,969
  3. #3James42,392
  4. #4Robert41,025
  5. #5Charles25,192
  6. #6George25,170
  7. #7Joseph24,266
  8. #8Edward18,536
  9. #9Frank15,701
  10. #10Thomas13,434
  11. #633Parker92
More about 1919

boys

980,122 boys got a published name in 1919; 1 in 10,654 of them was named Parker, which outranked 86.8% of the 4,810 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 30.9% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Parker
  1. #628Graham93
  2. #628Pablo93
  3. #628Tomas93
  4. #633Parker92
  5. #633Clem92
  6. #633Eldred92
  7. #633Sherwood92
  8. #638Abel91
  9. #638Connie91
  10. #638Emilio91

Tied with 4 names at #633; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1918
Risers
  1. ↑ 446Quinten#1,313 → #867
  2. ↑ 432Dempsey#1,012 → #580
  3. ↑ 341Winton#1,231 → #890
  4. ↑ 334Donnie#1,211 → #877
  5. ↑ 332Edsel#1,062 → #730
Fallers
  1. ↓ 2,008Foch#869 → #2,877
  2. ↓ 582Carmel#949 → #1,531
  3. ↓ 403Eligah#918 → #1,321
  4. ↓ 398Nels#809 → #1,207
  5. ↓ 355Myer#966 → #1,321

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1919 →