Pedro
- Last seen for girls in 2004 at #16,099
- #455 for boys in 2025, 684 births
- Given to boys 99.5% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1992 · 1,670 births
- Debut · boys
- 31 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 94,083since 1880
Pedro over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Pedro has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #455 | 684 | |
| 2024 | — | #403 | 801 | |
| 2023 | — | #420 | 756 | |
| 2022 | — | #417 | 775 | |
| 2021 | — | #430 | 722 | |
| 2020 | — | #410 | 723 | |
| 2019 | — | #398 | 784 | |
| 2018 | — | #394 | 805 | |
| 2017 | — | #395 | 811 | |
| 2016 | — | #375 | 878 | |
| 2015 | — | #368 | 875 | |
| 2014 | — | #355 | 904 | |
| 2013 | — | #346 | 925 | |
| 2012 | — | #317 | 1,017 | |
| 2011 | — | #307 | 1,049 | |
| 2010 | — | #282 | 1,193 | |
| 2009 | — | #269 | 1,276 | |
| 2008 | — | #248 | 1,409 | |
| 2007 | — | #230 | 1,609 | |
| 2006 | — | #219 | 1,651 | |
| 2005 | — | #218 | 1,645 | |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | #226 | 1,517 |
| 2003 | — | #224 | 1,559 | |
| 2002 | — | #225 | 1,555 | |
| 2001 | — | #210 | 1,696 | |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #210 | 1,704 |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | #202 | 1,690 |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | #200 | 1,672 |
| 1997 | #8,334 | 10 | #207 | 1,498 |
| 1996 | #8,132 | 10 | #198 | 1,566 |
| 1995 | #8,766 | 9 | #193 | 1,587 |
| 1994 | #6,672 | 13 | #189 | 1,628 |
| 1993 | #8,052 | 10 | #189 | 1,666 |
| 1992 | #5,484 | 17 | #188 | 1,670 |
| 1991 | #6,588 | 13 | #194 | 1,614 |
| 1990 | #9,247 | 8 | #196 | 1,543 |
| 1989 | #8,037 | 9 | #199 | 1,470 |
| 1988 | #6,666 | 11 | #204 | 1,307 |
| 1987 | #5,923 | 12 | #204 | 1,257 |
| 1986 | #4,347 | 18 | #206 | 1,167 |
| 1985 | #6,031 | 11 | #196 | 1,245 |
| 1984 | #6,291 | 10 | #206 | 1,120 |
| 1983 | #9,015 | 6 | #213 | 1,089 |
| 1982 | #4,716 | 15 | #203 | 1,205 |
| 1981 | #5,254 | 13 | #201 | 1,228 |
| 1980 | #5,544 | 12 | #222 | 1,090 |
| 1979 | #6,696 | 9 | #214 | 1,097 |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #213 | 1,017 |
| 1977 | #5,213 | 12 | #226 | 958 |
| 1976 | #4,363 | 14 | #218 | 956 |
| 1975 | #7,173 | 7 | #216 | 983 |
| 1974 | #5,011 | 11 | #216 | 980 |
| 1973 | #4,871 | 11 | #243 | 865 |
| 1972 | — | #248 | 842 | |
| 1971 | #6,619 | 7 | #248 | 912 |
| 1970 | #4,246 | 13 | #257 | 888 |
| 1969 | #5,057 | 9 | #248 | 843 |
| 1968 | — | #254 | 786 | |
| 1967 | #6,042 | 6 | #269 | 731 |
| 1966 | #5,809 | 6 | #286 | 677 |
| 1965 | #5,817 | 6 | #283 | 701 |
| 1964 | #5,474 | 7 | #297 | 707 |
| 1963 | — | #313 | 642 | |
| 1962 | #5,860 | 6 | #286 | 708 |
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | #316 | 615 |
| 1960 | — | #303 | 657 | |
| 1959 | #6,245 | 5 | #303 | 655 |
| 1958 | #5,408 | 6 | #306 | 614 |
| 1957 | — | #306 | 615 | |
| 1956 | #5,325 | 6 | #308 | 585 |
| 1955 | #5,208 | 6 | #308 | 557 |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | #290 | 603 |
| 1953 | #3,480 | 11 | #304 | 545 |
| 1952 | — | #306 | 540 | |
| 1951 | — | #303 | 525 | |
| 1950 | — | #293 | 533 | |
| 1949 | #3,612 | 9 | #298 | 512 |
| 1948 | #5,243 | 5 | #301 | 529 |
| 1947 | #4,345 | 7 | #320 | 456 |
| 1946 | — | #309 | 444 | |
| 1945 | #4,025 | 6 | #310 | 367 |
| 1944 | — | #300 | 397 | |
| 1943 | #4,691 | 5 | #323 | 357 |
| 1942 | #4,124 | 6 | #336 | 326 |
| 1941 | #3,954 | 6 | #316 | 339 |
| 1940 | — | #314 | 317 | |
| 1939 | — | #309 | 324 | |
| 1938 | — | #316 | 300 | |
| 1937 | — | #300 | 325 | |
| 1936 | — | #300 | 315 | |
| 1935 | #4,204 | 5 | #287 | 357 |
| 1934 | — | #284 | 362 | |
| 1933 | — | #304 | 310 | |
| 1932 | #2,831 | 10 | #295 | 347 |
| 1931 | — | #287 | 367 | |
| 1930 | #2,845 | 10 | #250 | 501 |
| 1929 | #3,394 | 8 | #256 | 473 |
| 1928 | #3,743 | 7 | #257 | 481 |
| 1927 | #3,284 | 9 | #278 | 411 |
| 1926 | — | #284 | 404 | |
| 1925 | — | #280 | 423 | |
| 1924 | — | #274 | 433 | |
| 1923 | — | #308 | 341 | |
| 1922 | — | #315 | 329 | |
| 1921 | — | #324 | 327 | |
| 1920 | — | #352 | 279 | |
| 1919 | — | #381 | 232 | |
| 1918 | — | #395 | 226 | |
| 1917 | — | #367 | 231 | |
| 1916 | — | #392 | 200 | |
| 1915 | — | #387 | 193 | |
| 1914 | — | #371 | 162 | |
| 1913 | — | #372 | 127 | |
| 1912 | — | #345 | 120 | |
| 1911 | — | #308 | 76 | |
| 1910 | — | #267 | 83 | |
| 1909 | — | #307 | 56 | |
| 1908 | — | #301 | 53 | |
| 1907 | — | #256 | 66 | |
| 1906 | — | #281 | 50 | |
| 1905 | — | #277 | 51 | |
| 1904 | — | #294 | 43 | |
| 1903 | — | #282 | 44 | |
| 1902 | — | #285 | 44 | |
| 1901 | — | #291 | 36 | |
| 1900 | — | #319 | 44 | |
| 1899 | — | #362 | 25 | |
| 1898 | — | #377 | 27 | |
| 1897 | — | #411 | 21 | |
| 1896 | — | #290 | 40 | |
| 1895 | — | #399 | 23 | |
| 1894 | — | #308 | 32 | |
| 1893 | — | #312 | 31 | |
| 1892 | — | #357 | 28 | |
| 1891 | — | #340 | 25 | |
| 1890 | — | #302 | 32 | |
| 1889 | — | #348 | 26 | |
| 1888 | — | #369 | 25 | |
| 1887 | — | #377 | 19 | |
| 1886 | — | #348 | 24 | |
| 1885 | — | #364 | 23 | |
| 1884 | — | #318 | 30 | |
| 1883 | — | #412 | 18 | |
| 1882 | — | #332 | 27 | |
| 1881 | — | #460 | 14 | |
| 1880 | — | #299 | 31 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Pedro was already there! It came in at #299, and was given to 31 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1881, when fewer than 15 boys a year got the name.
Where Pedro is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Massachusetts#215 · 1 in 965
- Texas#257 · 1 in 1,144
- Nebraska#266 · 1 in 980
- Arizona#288 · 1 in 1,212
- California#334 · 1 in 1,625
Best ever in a state: #13 in New Mexico, 1911.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | #215 | 28 | 1 in 965 |
| Texas | #257 | 153 | 1 in 1,144 |
| Nebraska | #266 | 9 | 1 in 980 |
| Arizona | #288 | 27 | 1 in 1,212 |
| California | #334 | 108 | 1 in 1,625 |
| Florida | #338 | 57 | 1 in 1,676 |
| Illinois | #345 | 31 | 1 in 1,598 |
| Nevada | #389 | 7 | 1 in 1,613 |
| Iowa | #399 | 8 | 1 in 1,729 |
| Tennessee | #452 | 17 | 1 in 2,163 |
| Alabama | #484 | 10 | 1 in 2,152 |
| Kentucky | #485 | 9 | 1 in 2,282 |
| New Jersey | #488 | 15 | 1 in 2,651 |
| Connecticut | #498 | 5 | 1 in 2,641 |
| Georgia | #499 | 21 | 1 in 2,391 |
| Colorado | #501 | 11 | 1 in 2,441 |
| South Carolina | #501 | 9 | 1 in 2,355 |
| Oklahoma | #552 | 7 | 1 in 2,526 |
| Pennsylvania | #577 | 16 | 1 in 3,266 |
| Virginia | #587 | 12 | 1 in 3,104 |
| Kansas | #590 | 5 | 1 in 2,809 |
| Michigan | #601 | 13 | 1 in 3,092 |
| Oregon | #604 | 5 | 1 in 3,012 |
| Utah | #621 | 6 | 1 in 3,277 |
| Indiana | #668 | 9 | 1 in 3,518 |
| North Carolina | #678 | 13 | 1 in 3,959 |
| Maryland | #702 | 6 | 1 in 3,816 |
| Minnesota | #718 | 6 | 1 in 4,083 |
| Ohio | #750 | 11 | 1 in 4,776 |
| Washington | #801 | 7 | 1 in 4,685 |
| New York | #885 | 15 | 1 in 5,628 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Pedro
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 45 spots since 2020 (#410 → #455)
- Biggest jump: 128 spots in 1882
- Biggest drop: 161 spots in 1881
Rise & fade · boys
112 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1992 at #188 (1,670 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 25 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,136
- Highest: 1 in 1,136 boys born in 1999 were named Pedro (0.09%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,497 boys born in 2025 (0.04%)
- Its best rank, #188 in 1992, was only 1 in 1,196 (0.08%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 17.1% of all boys named Pedro (16,134) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 237 | #299 (1880) | #363 |
| 1890s | 284 | #290 (1896) | #346 |
| 1900s | 487 | #256 (1907) | #289 |
| 1910s | 1,650 | #267 (1910) | #359 |
| 1920s | 3,901 | #256 (1929) | #293 |
| 1930s | 3,508 | #250 (1930) | #293 |
| 1940s | 4,044 | #298 (1949) | #313 |
| 1950s | 5,772 | #290 (1954) | #303 |
| 1960s | 7,067 | #248 (1969) | #286 |
| 1970s | 9,498 | #213 (1978) | #230 |
| 1980s | 12,178 | #196 (1985) | #205 |
| 1990s | 16,134 | #188 (1992) | #196 |
| 2000s | 15,621 | #210 (2000) | #228 |
| 2010s | 9,241 | #282 (2010) | #354 |
| 2020s | 4,461 | #403 (2024) | #423 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Pedro ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: