Porter
- #2,564 for girls in 2025, 68 births
- #560 for boys in 2025, 531 births
- Given to boys 95.4% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1880 · 38 births
- Debut · boys
- 38 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 20,808since 1880
Porter over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Porter has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #2,564 | 68 | #560 | 531 |
| 2024 | #2,434 | 74 | #617 | 464 |
| 2023 | #2,494 | 71 | #499 | 605 |
| 2022 | #2,295 | 81 | #506 | 592 |
| 2021 | #2,608 | 66 | #443 | 698 |
| 2020 | #2,823 | 58 | #424 | 707 |
| 2019 | #2,962 | 55 | #478 | 613 |
| 2018 | #3,293 | 48 | #418 | 749 |
| 2017 | #3,387 | 46 | #398 | 802 |
| 2016 | #2,966 | 56 | #419 | 749 |
| 2015 | #2,927 | 59 | #375 | 862 |
| 2014 | #3,778 | 40 | #368 | 857 |
| 2013 | #4,887 | 28 | #383 | 778 |
| 2012 | #4,387 | 33 | #430 | 644 |
| 2011 | #5,063 | 27 | #449 | 602 |
| 2010 | #7,217 | 17 | #446 | 602 |
| 2009 | #8,454 | 14 | #473 | 578 |
| 2008 | #6,559 | 20 | #482 | 574 |
| 2007 | #9,007 | 13 | #474 | 566 |
| 2006 | #9,286 | 12 | #479 | 553 |
| 2005 | #7,500 | 15 | #575 | 405 |
| 2004 | #11,624 | 8 | #628 | 336 |
| 2003 | #13,844 | 6 | #646 | 314 |
| 2002 | #8,837 | 11 | #687 | 265 |
| 2001 | #6,619 | 16 | #762 | 225 |
| 2000 | #11,801 | 7 | #801 | 201 |
| 1999 | #12,688 | 6 | #859 | 176 |
| 1998 | #12,426 | 6 | #1,197 | 103 |
| 1997 | — | #1,378 | 80 | |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #1,445 | 71 |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | #1,477 | 65 |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | #1,454 | 66 |
| 1993 | — | #1,741 | 49 | |
| 1992 | — | #2,085 | 37 | |
| 1991 | — | #2,019 | 37 | |
| 1990 | — | #2,049 | 36 | |
| 1989 | — | #2,416 | 27 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,367 | 25 | |
| 1987 | — | #2,272 | 25 | |
| 1986 | — | #2,161 | 26 | |
| 1985 | — | #1,866 | 31 | |
| 1984 | — | #2,159 | 24 | |
| 1983 | — | #1,787 | 31 | |
| 1982 | — | #1,999 | 27 | |
| 1981 | — | #2,270 | 22 | |
| 1980 | — | #2,536 | 19 | |
| 1979 | — | #2,897 | 15 | |
| 1978 | — | #2,375 | 19 | |
| 1977 | — | #1,670 | 32 | |
| 1976 | — | #2,601 | 16 | |
| 1975 | — | #2,001 | 23 | |
| 1974 | — | #2,050 | 21 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,982 | 21 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,535 | 31 | |
| 1971 | — | #1,494 | 33 | |
| 1970 | — | #1,546 | 30 | |
| 1969 | — | #1,376 | 34 | |
| 1968 | — | #1,393 | 31 | |
| 1967 | — | #1,652 | 22 | |
| 1966 | — | #1,216 | 38 | |
| 1965 | — | #1,254 | 37 | |
| 1964 | #6,009 | 6 | #1,288 | 37 |
| 1963 | — | #1,195 | 42 | |
| 1962 | — | #1,515 | 27 | |
| 1961 | — | #1,322 | 36 | |
| 1960 | — | #1,486 | 29 | |
| 1959 | — | #1,302 | 36 | |
| 1958 | — | #1,253 | 38 | |
| 1957 | — | #1,130 | 46 | |
| 1956 | — | #1,032 | 53 | |
| 1955 | — | #957 | 61 | |
| 1954 | — | #1,137 | 43 | |
| 1953 | — | #1,102 | 44 | |
| 1952 | — | #1,013 | 50 | |
| 1951 | — | #1,017 | 48 | |
| 1950 | — | #934 | 54 | |
| 1949 | — | #872 | 62 | |
| 1948 | — | #1,037 | 46 | |
| 1947 | — | #906 | 59 | |
| 1946 | — | #911 | 53 | |
| 1945 | — | #1,006 | 40 | |
| 1944 | — | #1,004 | 42 | |
| 1943 | — | #808 | 66 | |
| 1942 | — | #748 | 73 | |
| 1941 | — | #839 | 57 | |
| 1940 | — | #792 | 61 | |
| 1939 | — | #805 | 57 | |
| 1938 | — | #730 | 70 | |
| 1937 | — | #757 | 65 | |
| 1936 | — | #807 | 58 | |
| 1935 | — | #881 | 51 | |
| 1934 | — | #808 | 59 | |
| 1933 | — | #733 | 69 | |
| 1932 | — | #722 | 74 | |
| 1931 | — | #702 | 74 | |
| 1930 | — | #704 | 78 | |
| 1929 | — | #668 | 84 | |
| 1928 | — | #598 | 107 | |
| 1927 | — | #722 | 81 | |
| 1926 | — | #731 | 76 | |
| 1925 | — | #621 | 102 | |
| 1924 | — | #626 | 104 | |
| 1923 | — | #687 | 88 | |
| 1922 | — | #642 | 101 | |
| 1921 | — | #580 | 119 | |
| 1920 | — | #568 | 120 | |
| 1919 | — | #559 | 114 | |
| 1918 | — | #564 | 115 | |
| 1917 | #3,713 | 7 | #566 | 108 |
| 1916 | — | #498 | 131 | |
| 1915 | — | #555 | 103 | |
| 1914 | — | #497 | 97 | |
| 1913 | — | #498 | 76 | |
| 1912 | — | #474 | 68 | |
| 1911 | — | #441 | 44 | |
| 1910 | — | #430 | 40 | |
| 1909 | — | #505 | 26 | |
| 1908 | — | #429 | 31 | |
| 1907 | — | #429 | 29 | |
| 1906 | — | #456 | 24 | |
| 1905 | — | #346 | 35 | |
| 1904 | — | #401 | 27 | |
| 1903 | — | #430 | 22 | |
| 1902 | — | #337 | 33 | |
| 1901 | — | #371 | 25 | |
| 1900 | — | #455 | 25 | |
| 1899 | — | #362 | 25 | |
| 1898 | — | #329 | 34 | |
| 1897 | — | #360 | 27 | |
| 1896 | — | #380 | 26 | |
| 1895 | — | #383 | 25 | |
| 1894 | — | #358 | 26 | |
| 1893 | — | #359 | 25 | |
| 1892 | — | #312 | 35 | |
| 1891 | — | #386 | 20 | |
| 1890 | — | #345 | 26 | |
| 1889 | — | #405 | 20 | |
| 1888 | — | #289 | 37 | |
| 1887 | — | #461 | 14 | |
| 1886 | — | #348 | 24 | |
| 1885 | — | #277 | 36 | |
| 1884 | — | #375 | 22 | |
| 1883 | — | #346 | 23 | |
| 1882 | — | #324 | 28 | |
| 1881 | — | #276 | 32 | |
| 1880 | — | #273 | 38 | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Porter was already there! It came in at #273, and was given to 38 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1887, when fewer than 15 boys a year got the name.
Where Porter is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- North Dakota#191 · 1 in 559
- South Dakota#192 · 1 in 549
- Utah#193 · 1 in 702
- Montana#227 · 1 in 753
- Tennessee#273 · 1 in 1,149
Best ever in a state: #55 in Utah, 2007.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Dakota | #191 | 6 | 1 in 559 |
| South Dakota | #192 | 7 | 1 in 549 |
| Utah | #193 | 28 | 1 in 702 |
| Montana | #227 | 5 | 1 in 753 |
| Tennessee | #273 | 32 | 1 in 1,149 |
| Minnesota | #275 | 22 | 1 in 1,114 |
| Wisconsin | #300 | 19 | 1 in 1,233 |
| Idaho | #302 | 8 | 1 in 1,079 |
| Kansas | #324 | 11 | 1 in 1,277 |
| Missouri | #346 | 18 | 1 in 1,545 |
| South Carolina | #372 | 14 | 1 in 1,514 |
| Kentucky | #375 | 13 | 1 in 1,580 |
| Ohio | #395 | 27 | 1 in 1,946 |
| Oklahoma | #395 | 11 | 1 in 1,607 |
| Alabama | #400 | 13 | 1 in 1,655 |
| Mississippi | #415 | 7 | 1 in 1,548 |
| Michigan | #420 | 20 | 1 in 2,010 |
| Nebraska | #432 | 5 | 1 in 1,764 |
| Arkansas | #444 | 7 | 1 in 1,798 |
| Indiana | #452 | 15 | 1 in 2,111 |
| Washington | #502 | 14 | 1 in 2,343 |
| Louisiana | #531 | 8 | 1 in 2,391 |
| Georgia | #541 | 19 | 1 in 2,643 |
| Massachusetts | #555 | 8 | 1 in 3,378 |
| North Carolina | #569 | 17 | 1 in 3,028 |
| Colorado | #571 | 9 | 1 in 2,983 |
| Arizona | #594 | 11 | 1 in 2,975 |
| Virginia | #627 | 11 | 1 in 3,387 |
| Pennsylvania | #631 | 14 | 1 in 3,733 |
| Texas | #649 | 46 | 1 in 3,805 |
| Florida | #704 | 22 | 1 in 4,342 |
| Illinois | #805 | 10 | 1 in 4,955 |
| California | #906 | 25 | 1 in 7,019 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Porter
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 57 spots since 2024 (#617 → #560)
- 136 spots since 2020 (#424 → #560)
- Biggest jump: 338 spots in 1999
- Biggest drop: 196 spots in 1944
Rise & fade · boys
Peaked on debut
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1880 at #273 (38 births)
- Births halved by 1887, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 96 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 96 yrs · run 1880–1943
Share of babies · boys
1 in 2,224
- Highest: 1 in 2,224 boys born in 2015 were named Porter (0.04%)
- Latest: 1 in 3,217 boys born in 2025 (0.03%)
- Its best rank, #273 in 1880, was only 1 in 2,908 (0.03%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 34.9% of all boys named Porter (7,258) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 274 | #273 (1880) | #337 |
| 1890s | 269 | #312 (1892) | #357 |
| 1900s | 277 | #337 (1902) | #416 |
| 1910s | 896 | #430 (1910) | #508 |
| 1920s | 982 | #568 (1920) | #644 |
| 1930s | 655 | #702 (1931) | #765 |
| 1940s | 559 | #748 (1942) | #892 |
| 1950s | 473 | #934 (1950) | #1,088 |
| 1960s | 333 | #1,195 (1963) | #1,370 |
| 1970s | 241 | #1,494 (1971) | #2,015 |
| 1980s | 257 | #1,787 (1983) | #2,183 |
| 1990s | 720 | #859 (1999) | #1,570 |
| 2000s | 4,017 | #473 (2009) | #601 |
| 2010s | 7,258 | #368 (2014) | #416 |
| 2020s | 3,597 | #424 (2020) | #508 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Porter ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: