Pressley
- #10,107 for girls in 2025, 9 births
- Last seen for boys in 2012 at #12,274
- Given to girls 65.7% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2007 · 40 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 573since 1993
Pressley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #10,107 | 9 | — | |
| 2024 | #9,556 | 10 | — | |
| 2023 | #4,999 | 26 | — | |
| 2022 | #7,631 | 14 | — | |
| 2021 | #8,024 | 13 | — | |
| 2020 | #6,923 | 16 | — | |
| 2019 | #7,025 | 16 | — | |
| 2018 | #6,792 | 17 | — | |
| 2017 | #8,299 | 13 | — | |
| 2016 | #5,445 | 24 | — | |
| 2015 | #4,853 | 28 | — | |
| 2014 | #4,657 | 30 | — | |
| 2013 | #5,317 | 25 | — | |
| 2012 | #4,486 | 32 | #12,274 | 5 |
| 2011 | #4,915 | 28 | — | |
| 2010 | #4,180 | 35 | — | |
| 2009 | #4,107 | 37 | — | |
| 2008 | #6,130 | 22 | — | |
| 2007 | #3,918 | 40 | — | |
| 2006 | #5,906 | 22 | — | |
| 2005 | #8,330 | 13 | — | |
| 2004 | #8,716 | 12 | #11,356 | 5 |
| 2003 | #7,580 | 14 | #10,894 | 5 |
| 2002 | #8,280 | 12 | — | |
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | #6,445 | 10 |
| 2000 | #7,158 | 14 | — | |
| 1999 | #14,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1998 | #11,138 | 7 | — | |
| 1997 | #10,836 | 7 | — | |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | — | |
| 1995 | #11,783 | 6 | — | |
| 1994 | #10,569 | 7 | — | |
| 1993 | #13,442 | 5 | — | |
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | #8,236 | 5 | |
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | #6,089 | 6 | |
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | #6,315 | 5 | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #5,355 | 6 | |
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | #3,305 | 7 | |
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | #3,337 | 7 | |
| 1959 | — | #3,988 | 5 | |
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | #3,552 | 6 | |
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | #2,764 | 9 | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | #3,095 | 7 | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | #2,580 | 9 | |
| 1949 | — | #3,690 | 5 | |
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | #2,498 | 10 | |
| 1946 | — | #3,525 | 5 | |
| 1945 | — | #2,743 | 7 | |
| 1944 | — | #2,862 | 7 | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | #3,212 | 6 | |
| 1941 | — | #3,505 | 5 | |
| 1940 | — | #2,671 | 8 | |
| 1939 | — | #3,113 | 6 | |
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | #3,252 | 6 | |
| 1934 | — | #2,563 | 9 | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | #3,095 | 7 | |
| 1930 | — | #2,781 | 9 | |
| 1929 | — | #2,766 | 9 | |
| 1928 | — | #3,357 | 7 | |
| 1927 | — | #3,151 | 8 | |
| 1926 | — | #3,708 | 6 | |
| 1925 | — | #3,408 | 7 | |
| 1924 | — | #3,260 | 8 | |
| 1923 | — | #3,175 | 8 | |
| 1922 | — | #3,872 | 6 | |
| 1921 | — | #3,214 | 8 | |
| 1920 | — | #2,765 | 10 | |
| 1919 | — | #3,736 | 6 | |
| 1918 | — | #3,096 | 8 | |
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | #2,458 | 10 | |
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | #2,496 | 6 | |
| 1912 | — | #2,544 | 5 | |
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1993
The first year at least five girls were named Pressley! It came in at #13,442, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1993–1995, when fewer than 8 girls a year got the name.
Where Pressley is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Pressley in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Pressley
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 551 spots since 2024 (#9,556 → #10,107)
- 3,184 spots since 2020 (#6,923 → #10,107)
- 5,254 spots since 2015 (#4,853 → #10,107)
Rise & fade · girls
14 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1993
- Peaked 2007 at #3,918 (40 births)
- Births halved by 2017, 10 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 48,065
- Highest: 1 in 48,065 girls born in 2007 were named Pressley (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 178,585 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 43.3% of all girls named Pressley (248) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Flipped in 2002
- Mostly boys until 2001, mostly girls since
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45 | #9,581 (1996) | #11,680 |
| 2000s | 192 | #3,918 (2007) | #7,365 |
| 2010s | 248 | #4,180 (2010) | #5,597 |
| 2020s | 88 | #4,999 (2023) | #7,873 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Pressley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: