Priscilla

#544 for girls in 2025, 555 births · Last seen for boys in 1997 at #8,110
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1940 · 1,970 births
Debut · girls
26 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
122,796
since 1880

Priscilla over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Priscilla has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201910peak #127, 1940girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#544555—
2024#613487—
2023#649452—
2022#714411—
2021#620478—
2020#561523—
2019#618487—
2018#577535—
2017#526592—
2016#476669—
2015#501636—
2014#483652—
2013#479637—
2012#488632—
2011#484612—
2010#486621—
2009#412772—
2008#412777—
2007#374876—
2006#373874—
2005#345909—
2004#346921—
2003#2881,080—
2002#2851,090—
2001#2791,130—
2000#2731,170—
1999#2471,291—
1998#2381,284—
1997#2531,156#8,1106
1996#2591,093—
1995#2151,307—
1994#1961,507#8,8005
1993#1821,596—
1992#1791,726#8,4355
1991#1681,779#4,00514
1990#1671,754#6,4157
1989#1641,740#5,6158
1988#1561,812—
1987#1681,648#3,95911
1986#1751,536#4,8538
1985#1671,701#3,21614
1984#1721,601#4,5528
1983#1801,508#3,88410
1982#1841,488#5,6196
1981#1801,540#6,2625
1980#1871,432#4,9407
1979#2091,256—
1978#2251,099#5,0596
1977#272913—
1976#290789—
1975#317722—
1974#280904#3,5589
1973#290826#4,5056
1972#316766—
1971#304903—
1970#304936#3,8367
1969#300918—
1968#302857—
1967#290871—
1966#300846—
1965#283945—
1964#2671,138—
1963#2521,248#2,8589
1962#2571,211—
1961#2781,089#3,6526
1960#2521,215#3,0778
1959#2431,271—
1958#2191,396—
1957#2201,449#3,9935
1956#2241,350—
1955#2261,280—
1954#2221,307—
1953#2141,379#3,4256
1952#1921,547#3,7345
1951#1811,590—
1950#1691,672—
1949#1541,935—
1948#1551,847—
1947#1511,933—
1946#1601,659#3,1736
1945#1661,412—
1944#1571,576—
1943#1461,834#3,5385
1942#1351,988#2,38610
1941#1321,971#2,20711
1940#1271,970#2,6718
1939#1481,542#2,8297
1938#1881,026—
1937#207797—
1936#215758—
1935#220774—
1934#240664—
1933#234676—
1932#225728—
1931#221749—
1930#213824#4,0015
1929#214842—
1928#212887—
1927#211898#4,2105
1926#220834—
1925#224830—
1924#224861—
1923#227811#3,8226
1922#234761—
1921#248723—
1920#260637—
1919#269557—
1918#275518—
1917#288456—
1916#286440—
1915#292392—
1914#316279—
1913#304241—
1912#319205—
1911#325148—
1910#322142—
1909#36899—
1908#345106—
1907#321117—
1906#325107—
1905#35788—
1904#36580—
1903#35579—
1902#36279—
1901#35972—
1900#322110—
1899#37859—
1898#37171—
1897#34373—
1896#34372—
1895#35263—
1894#36459—
1893#37951—
1892#37850—
1891#34951—
1890#40040—
1889#38839—
1888#32056—
1887#29751—
1886#32642—
1885#35432—
1884#30440—
1883#34327—
1882#29635—
1881#30127—
1880#30926—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Priscilla was already there! It came in at #309, and was given to 26 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 36 girls a year got the name.

Where Priscilla is popular in 1910

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #190 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,167 girlsMNIllinois: #290 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,627 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMINew York: #409 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 6,486 girlsNYMassachusetts: #86 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 421 girlsMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedINOhio: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedOHPennsylvania: #205 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 1,859 girlsPANew Jersey: #212 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,729 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #277 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,101 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #227 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 1,560 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #249 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,387 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedALGeorgia: #348 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,119 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedHITexas: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Massachusetts#86 · 1 in 421
  2. Minnesota#190 · 1 in 1,167
  3. Pennsylvania#205 · 1 in 1,859
  4. New Jersey#212 · 1 in 1,729
  5. South Carolina#227 · 1 in 1,560

Best ever in a state: #15 in New Hampshire, 1937.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Massachusetts#86251 in 421
Minnesota#19051 in 1,167
Pennsylvania#205171 in 1,859
New Jersey#21251 in 1,729
South Carolina#22761 in 1,560
Louisiana#24971 in 1,387
North Carolina#27761 in 2,101
Illinois#29071 in 2,627
Georgia#34851 in 3,119
New York#40951 in 6,486
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Michigan———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Ohio———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Texas———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Priscilla
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 69 spots since 2024 (#613 → #544)
  • 17 spots since 2020 (#561 → #544)
  • 43 spots since 2015 (#501 → #544)
  • Biggest jump: 69 spots in 2025 (#613 → #544)
  • Biggest drop: 94 spots in 2022 (#620 → #714)
Rise & fade · girls
60 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1940 at #127 (1,970 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 25 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 580
  • Highest: 1 in 580 girls born in 1940 were named Priscilla (0.17%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,896 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 14.8% of all girls named Priscilla (18,125) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s375#296 (1882)#324
1890s589#343 (1897)#366
1900s937#321 (1907)#348
1910s3,378#269 (1919)#300
1920s8,084#211 (1927)#227
1930s8,538#148 (1939)#211
1940s18,125#127 (1940)#148
1950s14,241#169 (1950)#211
1960s10,338#252 (1963)#278
1970s9,114#209 (1979)#281
1980s16,006#156 (1988)#173
1990s14,493#167 (1990)#210
2000s9,599#273 (2000)#339
2010s6,073#476 (2016)#512
2020s2,906#544 (2025)#617

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Priscilla in 1910

girls
#322
142 births · 1 in 2,792 girls

Top girls' names in 1910

  1. #1Mary22,848
  2. #2Helen10,479
  3. #3Margaret8,226
  4. #4Dorothy7,318
  5. #5Ruth7,212
  6. #6Anna6,436
  7. #7Elizabeth5,800
  8. #8Mildred5,692
  9. #9Marie4,790
  10. #10Alice4,671
  11. #322Priscilla142
More about 1910

girls

396,503 girls got a published name in 1910; 1 in 2,792 of them was named Priscilla, which outranked 88.5% of the 2,790 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 21.1% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Priscilla
  1. #319Iris143
  2. #319Maud143
  3. #319Wilhelmina143
  4. #322Priscilla142
  5. #322Jannie142
  6. #322Mayme142
  7. #325Aline141
  8. #325Alyce141
  9. #325Johanna141

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1909
Risers
  1. ↑ 960Alys#1,957 → #997
  2. ↑ 849Lannie#1,763 → #914
  3. ↑ 766Luz#1,763 → #997
  4. ↑ 762Vivien#1,607 → #845
  5. ↑ 693Buna#1,607 → #914
Fallers
  1. ↓ 864Earl#909 → #1,773
  2. ↓ 864Fleta#909 → #1,773
  3. ↓ 783Elba#990 → #1,773
  4. ↓ 644Odile#990 → #1,634
  5. ↓ 576Claribel#845 → #1,421

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1910 →