Priscilla

#544 for girls in 2025, 555 births · Last seen for boys in 1997 at #8,110
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1940 · 1,970 births
Debut · girls
26 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
122,796
since 1880

Priscilla over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Priscilla has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201917peak #127, 1940girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#544555—
2024#613487—
2023#649452—
2022#714411—
2021#620478—
2020#561523—
2019#618487—
2018#577535—
2017#526592—
2016#476669—
2015#501636—
2014#483652—
2013#479637—
2012#488632—
2011#484612—
2010#486621—
2009#412772—
2008#412777—
2007#374876—
2006#373874—
2005#345909—
2004#346921—
2003#2881,080—
2002#2851,090—
2001#2791,130—
2000#2731,170—
1999#2471,291—
1998#2381,284—
1997#2531,156#8,1106
1996#2591,093—
1995#2151,307—
1994#1961,507#8,8005
1993#1821,596—
1992#1791,726#8,4355
1991#1681,779#4,00514
1990#1671,754#6,4157
1989#1641,740#5,6158
1988#1561,812—
1987#1681,648#3,95911
1986#1751,536#4,8538
1985#1671,701#3,21614
1984#1721,601#4,5528
1983#1801,508#3,88410
1982#1841,488#5,6196
1981#1801,540#6,2625
1980#1871,432#4,9407
1979#2091,256—
1978#2251,099#5,0596
1977#272913—
1976#290789—
1975#317722—
1974#280904#3,5589
1973#290826#4,5056
1972#316766—
1971#304903—
1970#304936#3,8367
1969#300918—
1968#302857—
1967#290871—
1966#300846—
1965#283945—
1964#2671,138—
1963#2521,248#2,8589
1962#2571,211—
1961#2781,089#3,6526
1960#2521,215#3,0778
1959#2431,271—
1958#2191,396—
1957#2201,449#3,9935
1956#2241,350—
1955#2261,280—
1954#2221,307—
1953#2141,379#3,4256
1952#1921,547#3,7345
1951#1811,590—
1950#1691,672—
1949#1541,935—
1948#1551,847—
1947#1511,933—
1946#1601,659#3,1736
1945#1661,412—
1944#1571,576—
1943#1461,834#3,5385
1942#1351,988#2,38610
1941#1321,971#2,20711
1940#1271,970#2,6718
1939#1481,542#2,8297
1938#1881,026—
1937#207797—
1936#215758—
1935#220774—
1934#240664—
1933#234676—
1932#225728—
1931#221749—
1930#213824#4,0015
1929#214842—
1928#212887—
1927#211898#4,2105
1926#220834—
1925#224830—
1924#224861—
1923#227811#3,8226
1922#234761—
1921#248723—
1920#260637—
1919#269557—
1918#275518—
1917#288456—
1916#286440—
1915#292392—
1914#316279—
1913#304241—
1912#319205—
1911#325148—
1910#322142—
1909#36899—
1908#345106—
1907#321117—
1906#325107—
1905#35788—
1904#36580—
1903#35579—
1902#36279—
1901#35972—
1900#322110—
1899#37859—
1898#37171—
1897#34373—
1896#34372—
1895#35263—
1894#36459—
1893#37951—
1892#37850—
1891#34951—
1890#40040—
1889#38839—
1888#32056—
1887#29751—
1886#32642—
1885#35432—
1884#30440—
1883#34327—
1882#29635—
1881#30127—
1880#30926—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Priscilla was already there! It came in at #309, and was given to 26 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 36 girls a year got the name.

Where Priscilla is popular in 1917

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedAKMaine: #62 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 242 girlsMEVermont: #65 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 230 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #99 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 390 girlsNHWashington: #244 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,739 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #351 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,597 girlsMNIllinois: #454 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 6,470 girlsILWisconsin: #219 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,664 girlsWIMichigan: #247 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,136 girlsMINew York: #244 for girls · 40 births · 1 in 2,430 girlsNYMassachusetts: #68 for girls · 118 births · 1 in 298 girlsMARhode Island: #181 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,033 girlsRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedSDIowa: #345 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,438 girlsIAIndiana: #360 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,047 girlsINOhio: #301 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 3,380 girlsOHPennsylvania: #296 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 4,062 girlsPANew Jersey: #215 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 2,298 girlsNJConnecticut: #230 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,061 girlsCTCalifornia: #308 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,318 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: #357 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,223 girlsWVVirginia: #373 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,176 girlsVAMaryland: #234 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 2,123 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: #140 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 456 girlsNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedKSArkansas: #412 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,000 girlsARTennessee: #466 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 4,875 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #331 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 3,151 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #351 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,258 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedDCOklahoma: #374 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,830 girlsOKLouisiana: #411 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 3,127 girlsLAMississippi: #309 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,200 girlsMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedALGeorgia: #387 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,905 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedHITexas: #855 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,453 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Priscilla, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Maine#62 · 1 in 242
  2. Vermont#65 · 1 in 230
  3. Massachusetts#68 · 1 in 298
  4. New Hampshire#99 · 1 in 390
  5. New Mexico#140 · 1 in 456

Best ever in a state: #15 in New Hampshire, 1937.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Maine#62251 in 242
Vermont#65111 in 230
Massachusetts#681181 in 298
New Hampshire#9981 in 390
New Mexico#14071 in 456
Rhode Island#18151 in 1,033
New Jersey#215131 in 2,298
Wisconsin#219141 in 1,664
Connecticut#23071 in 2,061
Maryland#23461 in 2,123
New York#244401 in 2,430
Washington#24451 in 1,739
Michigan#247161 in 2,136
Pennsylvania#296231 in 4,062
Ohio#301151 in 3,380
California#30891 in 2,318
Mississippi#30981 in 2,200
North Carolina#331101 in 3,151
Iowa#34561 in 3,438
Minnesota#35161 in 3,597
South Carolina#35161 in 3,258
West Virginia#35751 in 3,223
Indiana#36061 in 4,047
Virginia#37361 in 4,176
Oklahoma#37471 in 2,830
Georgia#38781 in 3,905
Louisiana#41161 in 3,127
Arkansas#41261 in 3,000
Illinois#45491 in 6,470
Tennessee#46651 in 4,875
Texas#85551 in 9,453
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Colorado———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
North Dakota———
Oregon———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Priscilla
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 69 spots since 2024 (#613 → #544)
  • 17 spots since 2020 (#561 → #544)
  • 43 spots since 2015 (#501 → #544)
  • Biggest jump: 69 spots in 2025 (#613 → #544)
  • Biggest drop: 94 spots in 2022 (#620 → #714)
Rise & fade · girls
60 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1940 at #127 (1,970 births)
  • Births halved by 1965, 25 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 580
  • Highest: 1 in 580 girls born in 1940 were named Priscilla (0.17%)
  • Latest: 1 in 2,896 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
  • 14.8% of all girls named Priscilla (18,125) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s375#296 (1882)#324
1890s589#343 (1897)#366
1900s937#321 (1907)#348
1910s3,378#269 (1919)#300
1920s8,084#211 (1927)#227
1930s8,538#148 (1939)#211
1940s18,125#127 (1940)#148
1950s14,241#169 (1950)#211
1960s10,338#252 (1963)#278
1970s9,114#209 (1979)#281
1980s16,006#156 (1988)#173
1990s14,493#167 (1990)#210
2000s9,599#273 (2000)#339
2010s6,073#476 (2016)#512
2020s2,906#544 (2025)#617

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Priscilla in 1917

girls
#288
456 births · 1 in 2,371 girls

Top girls' names in 1917

  1. #1Mary64,280
  2. #2Helen34,251
  3. #3Dorothy28,852
  4. #4Margaret25,560
  5. #5Ruth23,568
  6. #6Mildred16,256
  7. #7Anna15,160
  8. #8Elizabeth15,131
  9. #9Frances14,363
  10. #10Virginia14,261
  11. #288Priscilla456
More about 1917

girls

1,081,267 girls got a published name in 1917; 1 in 2,371 of them was named Priscilla, which outranked 94.6% of the 5,310 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Priscilla
  1. #284Olivia476
  2. #286Myra465
  3. #287Tillie459
  4. #288Priscilla456
  5. #289Janice455
  6. #290Nadine453
  7. #291Bettie447
Biggest movers since 1916
Risers
  1. ↑ 549Georgene#1,445 → #896
  2. ↑ 380Ottie#1,332 → #952
  3. ↑ 365Louis#1,298 → #933
  4. ↑ 334Valentine#1,298 → #964
  5. ↑ 322Harold#1,210 → #888
Fallers
  1. ↓ 401Ceola#840 → #1,241
  2. ↓ 373Floretta#964 → #1,337
  3. ↓ 344Buelah#993 → #1,337
  4. ↓ 326Glennie#915 → #1,241
  5. ↓ 290Maye#915 → #1,205

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1917 →