Priscilla
#544 for girls in 2025, 555 births · Last seen for boys in 1997 at #8,110
Given to girls 99.8% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1940 · 1,970 births
- Debut · girls
- 26 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 122,796since 1880
Priscilla over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Priscilla has never cracked the top 100 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #544 | 555 | — | |
| 2024 | #613 | 487 | — | |
| 2023 | #649 | 452 | — | |
| 2022 | #714 | 411 | — | |
| 2021 | #620 | 478 | — | |
| 2020 | #561 | 523 | — | |
| 2019 | #618 | 487 | — | |
| 2018 | #577 | 535 | — | |
| 2017 | #526 | 592 | — | |
| 2016 | #476 | 669 | — | |
| 2015 | #501 | 636 | — | |
| 2014 | #483 | 652 | — | |
| 2013 | #479 | 637 | — | |
| 2012 | #488 | 632 | — | |
| 2011 | #484 | 612 | — | |
| 2010 | #486 | 621 | — | |
| 2009 | #412 | 772 | — | |
| 2008 | #412 | 777 | — | |
| 2007 | #374 | 876 | — | |
| 2006 | #373 | 874 | — | |
| 2005 | #345 | 909 | — | |
| 2004 | #346 | 921 | — | |
| 2003 | #288 | 1,080 | — | |
| 2002 | #285 | 1,090 | — | |
| 2001 | #279 | 1,130 | — | |
| 2000 | #273 | 1,170 | — | |
| 1999 | #247 | 1,291 | — | |
| 1998 | #238 | 1,284 | — | |
| 1997 | #253 | 1,156 | #8,110 | 6 |
| 1996 | #259 | 1,093 | — | |
| 1995 | #215 | 1,307 | — | |
| 1994 | #196 | 1,507 | #8,800 | 5 |
| 1993 | #182 | 1,596 | — | |
| 1992 | #179 | 1,726 | #8,435 | 5 |
| 1991 | #168 | 1,779 | #4,005 | 14 |
| 1990 | #167 | 1,754 | #6,415 | 7 |
| 1989 | #164 | 1,740 | #5,615 | 8 |
| 1988 | #156 | 1,812 | — | |
| 1987 | #168 | 1,648 | #3,959 | 11 |
| 1986 | #175 | 1,536 | #4,853 | 8 |
| 1985 | #167 | 1,701 | #3,216 | 14 |
| 1984 | #172 | 1,601 | #4,552 | 8 |
| 1983 | #180 | 1,508 | #3,884 | 10 |
| 1982 | #184 | 1,488 | #5,619 | 6 |
| 1981 | #180 | 1,540 | #6,262 | 5 |
| 1980 | #187 | 1,432 | #4,940 | 7 |
| 1979 | #209 | 1,256 | — | |
| 1978 | #225 | 1,099 | #5,059 | 6 |
| 1977 | #272 | 913 | — | |
| 1976 | #290 | 789 | — | |
| 1975 | #317 | 722 | — | |
| 1974 | #280 | 904 | #3,558 | 9 |
| 1973 | #290 | 826 | #4,505 | 6 |
| 1972 | #316 | 766 | — | |
| 1971 | #304 | 903 | — | |
| 1970 | #304 | 936 | #3,836 | 7 |
| 1969 | #300 | 918 | — | |
| 1968 | #302 | 857 | — | |
| 1967 | #290 | 871 | — | |
| 1966 | #300 | 846 | — | |
| 1965 | #283 | 945 | — | |
| 1964 | #267 | 1,138 | — | |
| 1963 | #252 | 1,248 | #2,858 | 9 |
| 1962 | #257 | 1,211 | — | |
| 1961 | #278 | 1,089 | #3,652 | 6 |
| 1960 | #252 | 1,215 | #3,077 | 8 |
| 1959 | #243 | 1,271 | — | |
| 1958 | #219 | 1,396 | — | |
| 1957 | #220 | 1,449 | #3,993 | 5 |
| 1956 | #224 | 1,350 | — | |
| 1955 | #226 | 1,280 | — | |
| 1954 | #222 | 1,307 | — | |
| 1953 | #214 | 1,379 | #3,425 | 6 |
| 1952 | #192 | 1,547 | #3,734 | 5 |
| 1951 | #181 | 1,590 | — | |
| 1950 | #169 | 1,672 | — | |
| 1949 | #154 | 1,935 | — | |
| 1948 | #155 | 1,847 | — | |
| 1947 | #151 | 1,933 | — | |
| 1946 | #160 | 1,659 | #3,173 | 6 |
| 1945 | #166 | 1,412 | — | |
| 1944 | #157 | 1,576 | — | |
| 1943 | #146 | 1,834 | #3,538 | 5 |
| 1942 | #135 | 1,988 | #2,386 | 10 |
| 1941 | #132 | 1,971 | #2,207 | 11 |
| 1940 | #127 | 1,970 | #2,671 | 8 |
| 1939 | #148 | 1,542 | #2,829 | 7 |
| 1938 | #188 | 1,026 | — | |
| 1937 | #207 | 797 | — | |
| 1936 | #215 | 758 | — | |
| 1935 | #220 | 774 | — | |
| 1934 | #240 | 664 | — | |
| 1933 | #234 | 676 | — | |
| 1932 | #225 | 728 | — | |
| 1931 | #221 | 749 | — | |
| 1930 | #213 | 824 | #4,001 | 5 |
| 1929 | #214 | 842 | — | |
| 1928 | #212 | 887 | — | |
| 1927 | #211 | 898 | #4,210 | 5 |
| 1926 | #220 | 834 | — | |
| 1925 | #224 | 830 | — | |
| 1924 | #224 | 861 | — | |
| 1923 | #227 | 811 | #3,822 | 6 |
| 1922 | #234 | 761 | — | |
| 1921 | #248 | 723 | — | |
| 1920 | #260 | 637 | — | |
| 1919 | #269 | 557 | — | |
| 1918 | #275 | 518 | — | |
| 1917 | #288 | 456 | — | |
| 1916 | #286 | 440 | — | |
| 1915 | #292 | 392 | — | |
| 1914 | #316 | 279 | — | |
| 1913 | #304 | 241 | — | |
| 1912 | #319 | 205 | — | |
| 1911 | #325 | 148 | — | |
| 1910 | #322 | 142 | — | |
| 1909 | #368 | 99 | — | |
| 1908 | #345 | 106 | — | |
| 1907 | #321 | 117 | — | |
| 1906 | #325 | 107 | — | |
| 1905 | #357 | 88 | — | |
| 1904 | #365 | 80 | — | |
| 1903 | #355 | 79 | — | |
| 1902 | #362 | 79 | — | |
| 1901 | #359 | 72 | — | |
| 1900 | #322 | 110 | — | |
| 1899 | #378 | 59 | — | |
| 1898 | #371 | 71 | — | |
| 1897 | #343 | 73 | — | |
| 1896 | #343 | 72 | — | |
| 1895 | #352 | 63 | — | |
| 1894 | #364 | 59 | — | |
| 1893 | #379 | 51 | — | |
| 1892 | #378 | 50 | — | |
| 1891 | #349 | 51 | — | |
| 1890 | #400 | 40 | — | |
| 1889 | #388 | 39 | — | |
| 1888 | #320 | 56 | — | |
| 1887 | #297 | 51 | — | |
| 1886 | #326 | 42 | — | |
| 1885 | #354 | 32 | — | |
| 1884 | #304 | 40 | — | |
| 1883 | #343 | 27 | — | |
| 1882 | #296 | 35 | — | |
| 1881 | #301 | 27 | — | |
| 1880 | #309 | 26 | — | |
First appearance
1880
In the first year the SSA published name data, Priscilla was already there! It came in at #309, and was given to 26 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1880–1883, when fewer than 36 girls a year got the name.
Where Priscilla is popular in 2019
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- California#358 · 1 in 1,775
- Arizona#372 · 1 in 1,506
- Utah#447 · 1 in 1,866
- Oklahoma#456 · 1 in 1,713
- Colorado#465 · 1 in 1,999
Best ever in a state: #15 in New Hampshire, 1937.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | #358 | 104 | 1 in 1,775 |
| Arizona | #372 | 19 | 1 in 1,506 |
| Utah | #447 | 9 | 1 in 1,866 |
| Oklahoma | #456 | 9 | 1 in 1,713 |
| Colorado | #465 | 11 | 1 in 1,999 |
| Washington | #476 | 15 | 1 in 1,985 |
| Oregon | #488 | 7 | 1 in 1,980 |
| Missouri | #565 | 10 | 1 in 2,559 |
| Florida | #571 | 30 | 1 in 2,820 |
| Kansas | #581 | 5 | 1 in 2,371 |
| New York | #591 | 29 | 1 in 2,928 |
| New Jersey | #612 | 12 | 1 in 2,926 |
| Tennessee | #616 | 11 | 1 in 2,782 |
| Minnesota | #623 | 8 | 1 in 2,869 |
| Pennsylvania | #627 | 16 | 1 in 3,118 |
| Texas | #649 | 49 | 1 in 3,236 |
| Illinois | #657 | 16 | 1 in 3,224 |
| Michigan | #700 | 11 | 1 in 3,625 |
| North Carolina | #703 | 13 | 1 in 3,454 |
| Wisconsin | #733 | 6 | 1 in 3,632 |
| Massachusetts | #752 | 6 | 1 in 4,119 |
| South Carolina | #759 | 5 | 1 in 3,539 |
| Louisiana | #840 | 5 | 1 in 3,802 |
| Ohio | #965 | 9 | 1 in 5,618 |
| Georgia | #989 | 9 | 1 in 5,152 |
| Indiana | #1,032 | 5 | 1 in 5,764 |
| Virginia | #1,052 | 6 | 1 in 5,881 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Priscilla
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 69 spots since 2024 (#613 → #544)
- 17 spots since 2020 (#561 → #544)
- 43 spots since 2015 (#501 → #544)
- Biggest jump: 69 spots in 2025 (#613 → #544)
- Biggest drop: 94 spots in 2022 (#620 → #714)
Rise & fade · girls
60 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1880
- Peaked 1940 at #127 (1,970 births)
- Births halved by 1965, 25 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 146 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 580
- Highest: 1 in 580 girls born in 1940 were named Priscilla (0.17%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,896 girls born in 2025 (0.03%)
Era · girls
The 1940s
- 14.8% of all girls named Priscilla (18,125) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 375 | #296 (1882) | #324 |
| 1890s | 589 | #343 (1897) | #366 |
| 1900s | 937 | #321 (1907) | #348 |
| 1910s | 3,378 | #269 (1919) | #300 |
| 1920s | 8,084 | #211 (1927) | #227 |
| 1930s | 8,538 | #148 (1939) | #211 |
| 1940s | 18,125 | #127 (1940) | #148 |
| 1950s | 14,241 | #169 (1950) | #211 |
| 1960s | 10,338 | #252 (1963) | #278 |
| 1970s | 9,114 | #209 (1979) | #281 |
| 1980s | 16,006 | #156 (1988) | #173 |
| 1990s | 14,493 | #167 (1990) | #210 |
| 2000s | 9,599 | #273 (2000) | #339 |
| 2010s | 6,073 | #476 (2016) | #512 |
| 2020s | 2,906 | #544 (2025) | #617 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Priscilla in 2019
girls
#618
487 births · 1 in 3,446 girls
Top girls' names in 2019
More about 2019
girls
1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 3,446 of them was named Priscilla, which outranked 96.6% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).
Ranked beside Priscilla
Biggest movers since 2018
Risers
Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.