Queen

#2,214 for girls in 2025, 83 births · Last seen for boys in 1949 at #3,690
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1907 · 91 births
Debut · girls
17 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
16,092
since 1880

Queen over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Queen has never cracked the top 300 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202016peak #369, 1907girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,21483—
2024#1,98099—
2023#1,614129—
2022#1,406162—
2021#1,135217—
2020#960265—
2019#982263—
2018#943282—
2017#1,075236—
2016#1,232198—
2015#1,513149—
2014#1,487150—
2013#1,675126—
2012#2,16087—
2011#3,22251—
2010#2,56271—
2009#2,96658—
2008#3,52946—
2007#2,89062—
2006#2,91659—
2005#2,90256—
2004#2,80857—
2003#2,39369—
2002#2,85452—
2001#2,60058—
2000#2,54559—
1999#2,34363—
1998#2,37059—
1997#2,51151—
1996#3,09338—
1995#2,58848—
1994#2,10265—
1993#1,75384—
1992#3,09137—
1991#4,65021—
1990#3,71428—
1989#5,83614—
1988#4,30820—
1987#7,3539—
1986#4,02820—
1985#4,28218—
1984#3,52723—
1983#4,68615—
1982#3,34425—
1981#2,61435—
1980#2,69934—
1979#2,62134—
1978#3,63720—
1977#3,36622—
1976#3,96316—
1975#3,25921—
1974#2,68327—
1973#3,63517—
1972#2,39830—
1971#3,37319—
1970#2,85624—
1969#2,05837—
1968#2,20530—
1967#1,78342—
1966#1,30469—
1965#1,30269—
1964#1,29374—
1963#1,20183—
1962#1,09099—
1961#1,023113—
1960#1,039107—
1959#871140—
1958#994109—
1957#887132—
1956#749168—
1955#700180—
1954#647203—
1953#628200—
1952#586219—
1951#596208—
1950#527244—
1949#561220#3,6905
1948#562219—
1947#549237—
1946#515234—
1945#523195—
1944#519193—
1943#464255—
1942#497224—
1941#521178—
1940#486197—
1939#448224—
1938#446226—
1937#429229—
1936#446203—
1935#434221#2,5299
1934#435224—
1933#424229#3,2686
1932#416247—
1931#431225—
1930#474200—
1929#411259—
1928#423258#4,1515
1927#425263—
1926#437246—
1925#435252—
1924#443249—
1923#427248—
1922#448232—
1921#483204—
1920#445228—
1919#432232—
1918#456216#3,7286
1917#490181—
1916#490172—
1915#533140—
1914#451148—
1913#439126—
1912#438116—
1911#402100—
1910#44580—
1909#42675—
1908#45662—
1907#36991—
1906#46553—
1905#40670—
1904#43056—
1903#44252—
1902#45947—
1901#44844—
1900#40767—
1899#46140—
1898#47542—
1897#42547—
1896#57628—
1895#49934—
1894#50432—
1893#46433—
1892#47932—
1891#44732—
1890#52425—
1889#43031—
1888#50325—
1887#48921—
1886#37832—
1885#52017—
1884#55614—
1883#61510—
1882#56011—
1881#43415—
1880#40317—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Queen was already there! It came in at #403, and was given to 17 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1987, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.

Where Queen is popular in 2016

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #768 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 4,090 girlsMNIllinois: #990 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,763 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWIMichigan: #1,000 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,010 girlsMINew York: #1,207 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 7,487 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedINOhio: #821 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,733 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,306 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 22,635 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNEMissouri: #735 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,875 girlsMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWVVirginia: #1,200 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,428 girlsVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: #1,096 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,473 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #576 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,551 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #668 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 2,998 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMSAlabama: #781 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,875 girlsALGeorgia: #702 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 3,432 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedHITexas: #1,094 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 6,971 girlsTXFlorida: #894 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 5,101 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Carolina#576 · 1 in 2,551
  2. Louisiana#668 · 1 in 2,998
  3. Georgia#702 · 1 in 3,432
  4. Missouri#735 · 1 in 3,875
  5. Minnesota#768 · 1 in 4,090

Best ever in a state: #105 in South Carolina, 1932.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#57671 in 2,551
Louisiana#66871 in 2,998
Georgia#702141 in 3,432
Missouri#73571 in 3,875
Minnesota#76861 in 4,090
Alabama#78151 in 3,875
Ohio#821111 in 4,733
Florida#894171 in 5,101
Illinois#990101 in 5,763
Michigan#1,00071 in 6,010
Texas#1,094241 in 6,971
North Carolina#1,09671 in 6,473
Virginia#1,20051 in 7,428
New York#1,207121 in 7,487
California#2,30691 in 22,635
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Queen
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 234 spots since 2024 (#1,980 → #2,214)
  • 1,254 spots since 2020 (#960 → #2,214)
  • 701 spots since 2015 (#1,513 → #2,214)
  • Biggest jump: 151 spots in 1897 (#576 → #425)
  • Biggest drop: 175 spots in 2021 (#960 → #1,135)
Rise & fade · girls
27 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1907 at #369 (91 births)
  • Births halved by 1967, 60 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 83 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 83 yrs · run 1880–1959
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,501
  • Highest: 1 in 3,501 girls born in 1907 were named Queen (0.03%)
  • Latest: 1 in 19,365 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 15.2% of all girls named Queen (2,439) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s193#378 (1886)#489
1890s345#425 (1897)#485
1900s617#369 (1907)#431
1910s1,511#402 (1911)#458
1920s2,439#411 (1929)#438
1930s2,228#416 (1932)#438
1940s2,152#464 (1943)#520
1950s1,803#527 (1950)#719
1960s723#1,023 (1961)#1,430
1970s230#2,398 (1972)#3,179
1980s213#2,614 (1981)#4,268
1990s494#1,753 (1993)#2,822
2000s576#2,393 (2003)#2,840
2010s1,613#943 (2018)#1,685
2020s955#960 (2020)#1,552

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Queen in 2016

girls
#1,232
198 births · 1 in 8,950 girls

Top girls' names in 2016

  1. #1Emma19,550
  2. #2Olivia19,414
  3. #3Ava16,354
  4. #4Sophia16,185
  5. #5Isabella14,863
  6. #6Mia14,464
  7. #7Charlotte13,118
  8. #8Abigail11,796
  9. #9Emily11,006
  10. #10Amelia10,809
  11. #1,232Queen198
More about 2016

girls

1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 8,950 of them was named Queen, which outranked 93.5% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Queen
  1. #1,229Annelise199
  2. #1,229Ila199
  3. #1,229Marlene199
  4. #1,232Queen198
  5. #1,232Kyrie198
  6. #1,232Lorena198
  7. #1,232Meera198
  8. #1,236Ashton197
  9. #1,236Charity197
  10. #1,236Journi197

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2015
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,389Kehlani#3,254 → #865
  2. ↑ 612Royalty#1,146 → #534
  3. ↑ 481Saoirse#1,448 → #967
  4. ↑ 396Ophelia#978 → #582
  5. ↑ 364Aitana#915 → #551
Fallers
  1. ↓ 542Caitlin#610 → #1,152
  2. ↓ 451Caitlyn#598 → #1,049
  3. ↓ 397Katelynn#652 → #1,049
  4. ↓ 382Kaitlynn#989 → #1,371
  5. ↓ 340Neriah#946 → #1,286

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2016 →