Queen

#2,214 for girls in 2025, 83 births · Last seen for boys in 1949 at #3,690
Given to girls 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1907 · 91 births
Debut · girls
17 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
16,092
since 1880

Queen over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Queen has never cracked the top 300 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202019peak #369, 1907girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2,21483—
2024#1,98099—
2023#1,614129—
2022#1,406162—
2021#1,135217—
2020#960265—
2019#982263—
2018#943282—
2017#1,075236—
2016#1,232198—
2015#1,513149—
2014#1,487150—
2013#1,675126—
2012#2,16087—
2011#3,22251—
2010#2,56271—
2009#2,96658—
2008#3,52946—
2007#2,89062—
2006#2,91659—
2005#2,90256—
2004#2,80857—
2003#2,39369—
2002#2,85452—
2001#2,60058—
2000#2,54559—
1999#2,34363—
1998#2,37059—
1997#2,51151—
1996#3,09338—
1995#2,58848—
1994#2,10265—
1993#1,75384—
1992#3,09137—
1991#4,65021—
1990#3,71428—
1989#5,83614—
1988#4,30820—
1987#7,3539—
1986#4,02820—
1985#4,28218—
1984#3,52723—
1983#4,68615—
1982#3,34425—
1981#2,61435—
1980#2,69934—
1979#2,62134—
1978#3,63720—
1977#3,36622—
1976#3,96316—
1975#3,25921—
1974#2,68327—
1973#3,63517—
1972#2,39830—
1971#3,37319—
1970#2,85624—
1969#2,05837—
1968#2,20530—
1967#1,78342—
1966#1,30469—
1965#1,30269—
1964#1,29374—
1963#1,20183—
1962#1,09099—
1961#1,023113—
1960#1,039107—
1959#871140—
1958#994109—
1957#887132—
1956#749168—
1955#700180—
1954#647203—
1953#628200—
1952#586219—
1951#596208—
1950#527244—
1949#561220#3,6905
1948#562219—
1947#549237—
1946#515234—
1945#523195—
1944#519193—
1943#464255—
1942#497224—
1941#521178—
1940#486197—
1939#448224—
1938#446226—
1937#429229—
1936#446203—
1935#434221#2,5299
1934#435224—
1933#424229#3,2686
1932#416247—
1931#431225—
1930#474200—
1929#411259—
1928#423258#4,1515
1927#425263—
1926#437246—
1925#435252—
1924#443249—
1923#427248—
1922#448232—
1921#483204—
1920#445228—
1919#432232—
1918#456216#3,7286
1917#490181—
1916#490172—
1915#533140—
1914#451148—
1913#439126—
1912#438116—
1911#402100—
1910#44580—
1909#42675—
1908#45662—
1907#36991—
1906#46553—
1905#40670—
1904#43056—
1903#44252—
1902#45947—
1901#44844—
1900#40767—
1899#46140—
1898#47542—
1897#42547—
1896#57628—
1895#49934—
1894#50432—
1893#46433—
1892#47932—
1891#44732—
1890#52425—
1889#43031—
1888#50325—
1887#48921—
1886#37832—
1885#52017—
1884#55614—
1883#61510—
1882#56011—
1881#43415—
1880#40317—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Queen was already there! It came in at #403, and was given to 17 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1987, when fewer than 10 girls a year got the name.

Where Queen is popular in 2019

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMNIllinois: #932 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,158 girlsILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWIMichigan: #700 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 3,625 girlsMINew York: #946 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 5,306 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedORNevada: #524 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 2,029 girlsNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedINOhio: #733 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 3,890 girlsOHPennsylvania: #1,030 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 6,236 girlsPANew Jersey: #1,148 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,023 girlsNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #1,298 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 9,228 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNEMissouri: #957 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 5,118 girlsMOKentucky: #734 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,499 girlsKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedWVVirginia: #1,183 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 7,057 girlsVAMaryland: #534 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 2,238 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedDEArizona: #817 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 4,089 girlsAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedARTennessee: #764 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 3,826 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #1,098 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 6,415 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #388 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,475 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #578 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,376 girlsLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedALGeorgia: #519 for girls · 20 births · 1 in 2,318 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Queen, so not publishedHITexas: #905 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 5,115 girlsTXFlorida: #726 for girls · 22 births · 1 in 3,845 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. South Carolina#388 · 1 in 1,475
  2. Georgia#519 · 1 in 2,318
  3. Nevada#524 · 1 in 2,029
  4. Maryland#534 · 1 in 2,238
  5. Louisiana#578 · 1 in 2,376

Best ever in a state: #105 in South Carolina, 1932.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
South Carolina#388121 in 1,475
Georgia#519201 in 2,318
Nevada#52451 in 2,029
Maryland#534101 in 2,238
Louisiana#57881 in 2,376
Michigan#700111 in 3,625
Florida#726221 in 3,845
Ohio#733131 in 3,890
Kentucky#73451 in 3,499
Tennessee#76481 in 3,826
Arizona#81771 in 4,089
Texas#905311 in 5,115
Illinois#932101 in 5,158
New York#946161 in 5,306
Missouri#95751 in 5,118
Pennsylvania#1,03081 in 6,236
North Carolina#1,09871 in 6,415
New Jersey#1,14851 in 7,023
Virginia#1,18351 in 7,057
California#1,298201 in 9,228
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Massachusetts———
Minnesota———
Mississippi———
Montana———
Nebraska———
New Hampshire———
New Mexico———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Queen
Momentum · girls
Falling
  • 234 spots since 2024 (#1,980 → #2,214)
  • 1,254 spots since 2020 (#960 → #2,214)
  • 701 spots since 2015 (#1,513 → #2,214)
  • Biggest jump: 151 spots in 1897 (#576 → #425)
  • Biggest drop: 175 spots in 2021 (#960 → #1,135)
Rise & fade · girls
27 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1907 at #369 (91 births)
  • Births halved by 1967, 60 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 83 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 83 yrs · run 1880–1959
Share of babies · girls
1 in 3,501
  • Highest: 1 in 3,501 girls born in 1907 were named Queen (0.03%)
  • Latest: 1 in 19,365 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 1920s
  • 15.2% of all girls named Queen (2,439) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s193#378 (1886)#489
1890s345#425 (1897)#485
1900s617#369 (1907)#431
1910s1,511#402 (1911)#458
1920s2,439#411 (1929)#438
1930s2,228#416 (1932)#438
1940s2,152#464 (1943)#520
1950s1,803#527 (1950)#719
1960s723#1,023 (1961)#1,430
1970s230#2,398 (1972)#3,179
1980s213#2,614 (1981)#4,268
1990s494#1,753 (1993)#2,822
2000s576#2,393 (2003)#2,840
2010s1,613#943 (2018)#1,685
2020s955#960 (2020)#1,552

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Queen in 2019

girls
#982
263 births · 1 in 6,382 girls

Top girls' names in 2019

  1. #1Olivia18,577
  2. #2Emma17,226
  3. #3Ava14,549
  4. #4Sophia13,821
  5. #5Isabella13,407
  6. #6Charlotte13,239
  7. #7Amelia12,944
  8. #8Mia12,508
  9. #9Harper10,497
  10. #10Evelyn10,443
  11. #982Queen263
More about 2019

girls

1,678,366 girls got a published name in 2019; 1 in 6,382 of them was named Queen, which outranked 94.6% of the 18,024 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Queen
  1. #978Ann264
  2. #978Giana264
  3. #978Paityn264
  4. #982Queen263
  5. #982Sariah263
  6. #984Beatrix262
  7. #984Luisa262
  8. #984Robin262

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2018
Risers
  1. ↑ 1,081Amoura#2,059 → #978
  2. ↑ 553Theodora#1,406 → #853
  3. ↑ 456Navy#1,269 → #813
  4. ↑ 415Emani#1,371 → #956
  5. ↑ 403Yaritza#1,216 → #813
Fallers
  1. ↓ 451Emmarie#990 → #1,441
  2. ↓ 368Saniyah#934 → #1,302
  3. ↓ 252Tatiana#692 → #944
  4. ↓ 229Zhavia#879 → #1,108
  5. ↓ 219Jayden#979 → #1,198

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2019 →