Rachel

#250 for girls in 2025, 1,225 births · Last seen for boys in 2018 at #12,156
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1996 · 16,121 births
Debut · girls
166 births
In top 100 · girls
43 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
573,957
since 1880

Rachel over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201942peak #9, 1996girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2501,225—
2024#2461,292—
2023#2541,224—
2022#2401,263—
2021#2391,271—
2020#2261,305—
2019#1911,548—
2018#1981,558#12,1565
2017#1911,622—
2016#1711,884—
2015#1671,941—
2014#1552,090#12,1085
2013#1372,325—
2012#1302,420#9,7097
2011#1152,664—
2010#993,024—
2009#893,589#12,4915
2008#744,087#12,5535
2007#594,841#9,7887
2006#485,551#9,5857
2005#386,226#5,87513
2004#346,923#2,95334
2003#287,997#5,27114
2002#248,944#4,91915
2001#249,556#7,5368
2000#2110,687#5,58812
1999#1911,632#4,16217
1998#1512,209#3,84918
1997#1313,798#3,16023
1996#916,121#2,91125
1995#1216,047#2,62628
1994#1315,492#2,84725
1993#1415,974#2,69726
1992#1615,840#2,67026
1991#1416,344#2,22732
1990#1615,710#1,90940
1989#1815,357#993106
1988#1915,348#1,30762
1987#1715,646#1,21863
1986#1515,455#1,29956
1985#1316,360#1,05077
1984#1515,839#97683
1983#2014,591#1,44843
1982#2113,871#1,14064
1981#2212,590#1,30950
1980#2311,618#1,21457
1979#2710,230#1,46441
1978#259,802#1,50838
1977#268,976#1,49038
1976#238,453#1,78128
1975#268,225#2,00123
1974#367,399#1,47135
1973#426,103#1,98221
1972#406,417#2,41815
1971#546,115#1,52632
1970#586,029#1,98920
1969#695,242#1,97718
1968#923,727#2,57611
1967#1053,312#2,35212
1966#1542,277#2,9868
1965#1752,011#2,36612
1964#1732,261#3,6016
1963#1792,178#4,0485
1962#1941,941#3,3057
1961#1862,054#3,3567
1960#1981,792—
1959#2011,744#3,2907
1958#2011,663#3,5596
1957#1941,821#3,2577
1956#1971,672#2,7989
1955#1851,802#2,21913
1954#1821,805#3,8275
1953#1751,780#2,7099
1952#1851,599#2,37611
1951#2021,435#3,0667
1950#1881,454—
1949#1911,437#3,2986
1948#1951,388—
1947#1901,447—
1946#1951,234—
1945#1741,207#2,7437
1944#1711,250—
1943#1701,371#2,7328
1942#1631,427#2,38610
1941#1591,384#1,68517
1940#1661,264#2,8717
1939#1601,345#2,4499
1938#1651,279#2,4799
1937#1631,229#2,08812
1936#1631,208#1,63917
1935#1641,198#2,24611
1934#1631,181#2,02213
1933#1611,142#2,36810
1932#1561,254#2,31311
1931#1611,171—
1930#1641,261#3,5926
1929#1671,214#2,45211
1928#1771,180#3,0768
1927#1691,286#3,4517
1926#1641,389#3,1398
1925#1651,439#3,1558
1924#1571,600—
1923#1601,483#4,2395
1922#1541,541#2,80110
1921#1521,583#2,80410
1920#1561,484#3,2088
1919#1491,488#3,1158
1918#1481,542#3,7286
1917#1571,339#3,9815
1916#1531,328#2,9268
1915#1561,205#3,0827
1914#151975#3,2645
1913#145827—
1912#151703—
1911#150537—
1910#150538#1,5895
1909#154462—
1908#159425—
1907#154420—
1906#158366—
1905#143421—
1904#152356—
1903#142383—
1902#141393—
1901#135369—
1900#153379#1,3105
1899#145324#1,0515
1898#138367—
1897#154297—
1896#137348—
1895#130351—
1894#136317—
1893#134321—
1892#122369—
1891#133267—
1890#124318—
1889#134266—
1888#129281—
1887#126226—
1886#130213—
1885#122212—
1884#114230—
1883#121174—
1882#109203—
1881#113157—
1880#109166—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Rachel was already there! It came in at #109, and was given to 166 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 240 girls a year got the name.

Where Rachel is popular in 1942

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedAKMaine: #77 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 255 girlsMEVermont: #101 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 420 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #95 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 325 girlsNHWashington: #341 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 3,249 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: #181 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,071 girlsNDMinnesota: #271 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,821 girlsMNIllinois: #278 for girls · 26 births · 1 in 2,712 girlsILWisconsin: #155 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,228 girlsWIMichigan: #292 for girls · 17 births · 1 in 3,279 girlsMINew York: #232 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 1,766 girlsNYMassachusetts: #158 for girls · 30 births · 1 in 1,262 girlsMARhode Island: #151 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 967 girlsRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedSDIowa: #187 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,509 girlsIAIndiana: #159 for girls · 28 births · 1 in 1,141 girlsINOhio: #190 for girls · 46 births · 1 in 1,432 girlsOHPennsylvania: #196 for girls · 59 births · 1 in 1,526 girlsPANew Jersey: #238 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,230 girlsNJConnecticut: #175 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 1,303 girlsCTCalifornia: #111 for girls · 139 births · 1 in 497 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedCONebraska: #196 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 1,410 girlsNEMissouri: #212 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,541 girlsMOKentucky: #172 for girls · 31 births · 1 in 946 girlsKYWest Virginia: #187 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,142 girlsWVVirginia: #82 for girls · 75 births · 1 in 389 girlsVAMaryland: #221 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 1,609 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedDEArizona: #132 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 450 girlsAZNew Mexico: #135 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 487 girlsNMKansas: #226 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,551 girlsKSArkansas: #177 for girls · 25 births · 1 in 815 girlsARTennessee: #106 for girls · 61 births · 1 in 514 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #53 for girls · 156 births · 1 in 269 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #94 for girls · 61 births · 1 in 390 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #164 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 956 girlsDCOklahoma: #195 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,133 girlsOKLouisiana: #237 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,142 girlsLAMississippi: #109 for girls · 58 births · 1 in 420 girlsMSAlabama: #132 for girls · 56 births · 1 in 591 girlsALGeorgia: #119 for girls · 72 births · 1 in 489 girlsGAHawaii: #149 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 532 girlsHITexas: #148 for girls · 97 births · 1 in 691 girlsTXFlorida: #180 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 847 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. North Carolina#53 · 1 in 269
  2. Maine#77 · 1 in 255
  3. Virginia#82 · 1 in 389
  4. South Carolina#94 · 1 in 390
  5. New Hampshire#95 · 1 in 325

Best ever in a state: #3 in Hawaii, 1995.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
North Carolina#531561 in 269
Maine#77281 in 255
Virginia#82751 in 389
South Carolina#94611 in 390
New Hampshire#95121 in 325
Vermont#10161 in 420
Tennessee#106611 in 514
Mississippi#109581 in 420
California#1111391 in 497
Georgia#119721 in 489
Alabama#132561 in 591
Arizona#132131 in 450
New Mexico#135121 in 487
Texas#148971 in 691
Hawaii#14971 in 532
Rhode Island#15161 in 967
Wisconsin#155231 in 1,228
Massachusetts#158301 in 1,262
Indiana#159281 in 1,141
District of Columbia#16491 in 956
Kentucky#172311 in 946
Connecticut#175121 in 1,303
Arkansas#177251 in 815
Florida#180211 in 847
North Dakota#18151 in 1,071
Iowa#187141 in 1,509
West Virginia#187181 in 1,142
Ohio#190461 in 1,432
Oklahoma#195181 in 1,133
Nebraska#19671 in 1,410
Pennsylvania#196591 in 1,526
Missouri#212211 in 1,541
Maryland#221111 in 1,609
Kansas#22691 in 1,551
New York#232641 in 1,766
Louisiana#237231 in 1,142
New Jersey#238161 in 2,230
Minnesota#27191 in 2,821
Illinois#278261 in 2,712
Michigan#292171 in 3,279
Washington#34151 in 3,249
Alaska———
Colorado———
Delaware———
Idaho———
Montana———
Nevada———
Oregon———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rachel
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 4 spots since 2024 (#246 → #250)
  • 24 spots since 2020 (#226 → #250)
  • 83 spots since 2015 (#167 → #250)
  • Biggest jump: 49 spots in 1967 (#154 → #105)
  • Biggest drop: 35 spots in 2020 (#191 → #226)
Rise & fade · girls
116 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1996 at #9 (16,121 births)
  • Births halved by 2003, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 1 yr
  • Top 10: 1 yr · 1996
  • Top 100: 43 yrs · run 1968–2010
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 105
  • Highest: 1 in 105 girls born in 1985 were named Rachel (0.95%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,312 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
  • Its best rank, #9 in 1996, was only 1 in 109 (0.92%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 26.0% of all girls named Rachel (149,167) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,128#109 (1882)#121
1890s3,279#122 (1892)#135
1900s3,974#135 (1901)#149
1910s10,482#145 (1913)#151
1920s14,199#152 (1921)#162
1930s12,268#156 (1932)#162
1940s13,409#159 (1941)#177
1950s16,775#175 (1953)#191
1960s26,795#69 (1969)#153
1970s77,749#23 (1976)#36
1980s146,675#13 (1985)#18
1990s149,167#9 (1996)#14
2000s68,401#21 (2000)#44
2010s21,076#99 (2010)#155
2020s7,580#226 (2020)#243

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rachel in 1942

girls
#163
1,427 births · 1 in 947 girls
boys
#2,386
10 births · 1 in 138,116 boys

Top girls' names in 1942

  1. #1Mary63,256
  2. #2Barbara44,739
  3. #3Patricia39,465
  4. #4Linda31,613
  5. #5Carol30,272
  6. #6Sandra24,994
  7. #7Judith24,792
  8. #8Nancy23,327
  9. #9Betty21,659
  10. #10Carolyn19,978
  11. #163Rachel1,427

Top boys' names in 1942

  1. #1James77,182
  2. #2Robert71,845
  3. #3John66,043
  4. #4William54,890
  5. #5Richard43,593
  6. #6David35,905
  7. #7Charles35,854
  8. #8Thomas31,100
  9. #9Ronald27,138
  10. #10Donald23,955
  11. #2,386Rachel10
More about 1942

girls

1,350,719 girls got a published name in 1942; 1 in 947 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 97.0% of the 5,378 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 24.0% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rachel
  1. #160Deanna1,447
  2. #161Minnie1,446
  3. #162Harriet1,443
  4. #163Rachel1,427
  5. #164Emily1,419
  6. #165Alma1,407
  7. #166Elsie1,399
Biggest movers since 1941
Risers
  1. ↑ 3,567Michal#4,420 → #853
  2. ↑ 1,885Merrily#2,397 → #512
  3. ↑ 1,081Merrilee#1,954 → #873
  4. ↑ 783Jerrilyn#1,610 → #827
  5. ↑ 760Candace#1,418 → #658
Fallers
  1. ↓ 354Rebekah#924 → #1,278
  2. ↓ 350Leatha#830 → #1,180
  3. ↓ 307Nella#993 → #1,300
  4. ↓ 272Arla#934 → #1,206
  5. ↓ 262Vivien#735 → #997

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,381,161 boys got a published name in 1942; 1 in 138,116 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 41.0% of the 4,044 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.8% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rachel
  1. #2,268Waldemar11
  2. #2,268Willford11
  3. #2,268Worley11
  4. #2,386Rachel10
  5. #2,386Abelino10
  6. #2,386Alvy10
  7. #2,386Amedeo10
  8. #2,523Abdul9
  9. #2,523Adalberto9
  10. #2,523Agnes9

Tied with 136 names at #2,386; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1941
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,993Macarthur#3,505 → #512
  2. ↑ 1,546Mcarthur#1,903 → #357
  3. ↑ 655Collin#1,588 → #933
  4. ↑ 514Delmas#1,254 → #740
  5. ↑ 390Colin#713 → #323
Fallers
  1. ↓ 525Otho#971 → #1,496
  2. ↓ 440Florian#918 → #1,358
  3. ↓ 421Martha#960 → #1,381
  4. ↓ 407Watson#951 → #1,358
  5. ↓ 371Gaylen#987 → #1,358

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1942 →