Rachel

#250 for girls in 2025, 1,225 births · Last seen for boys in 2018 at #12,156
Given to girls 99.7% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · girls
1996 · 16,121 births
Debut · girls
166 births
In top 100 · girls
43 yrs
of 146 years
Total births · girls
573,957
since 1880

Rachel over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.

#1#10#100rank188019001920194019601980200020201952peak #9, 1996girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025#2501,225—
2024#2461,292—
2023#2541,224—
2022#2401,263—
2021#2391,271—
2020#2261,305—
2019#1911,548—
2018#1981,558#12,1565
2017#1911,622—
2016#1711,884—
2015#1671,941—
2014#1552,090#12,1085
2013#1372,325—
2012#1302,420#9,7097
2011#1152,664—
2010#993,024—
2009#893,589#12,4915
2008#744,087#12,5535
2007#594,841#9,7887
2006#485,551#9,5857
2005#386,226#5,87513
2004#346,923#2,95334
2003#287,997#5,27114
2002#248,944#4,91915
2001#249,556#7,5368
2000#2110,687#5,58812
1999#1911,632#4,16217
1998#1512,209#3,84918
1997#1313,798#3,16023
1996#916,121#2,91125
1995#1216,047#2,62628
1994#1315,492#2,84725
1993#1415,974#2,69726
1992#1615,840#2,67026
1991#1416,344#2,22732
1990#1615,710#1,90940
1989#1815,357#993106
1988#1915,348#1,30762
1987#1715,646#1,21863
1986#1515,455#1,29956
1985#1316,360#1,05077
1984#1515,839#97683
1983#2014,591#1,44843
1982#2113,871#1,14064
1981#2212,590#1,30950
1980#2311,618#1,21457
1979#2710,230#1,46441
1978#259,802#1,50838
1977#268,976#1,49038
1976#238,453#1,78128
1975#268,225#2,00123
1974#367,399#1,47135
1973#426,103#1,98221
1972#406,417#2,41815
1971#546,115#1,52632
1970#586,029#1,98920
1969#695,242#1,97718
1968#923,727#2,57611
1967#1053,312#2,35212
1966#1542,277#2,9868
1965#1752,011#2,36612
1964#1732,261#3,6016
1963#1792,178#4,0485
1962#1941,941#3,3057
1961#1862,054#3,3567
1960#1981,792—
1959#2011,744#3,2907
1958#2011,663#3,5596
1957#1941,821#3,2577
1956#1971,672#2,7989
1955#1851,802#2,21913
1954#1821,805#3,8275
1953#1751,780#2,7099
1952#1851,599#2,37611
1951#2021,435#3,0667
1950#1881,454—
1949#1911,437#3,2986
1948#1951,388—
1947#1901,447—
1946#1951,234—
1945#1741,207#2,7437
1944#1711,250—
1943#1701,371#2,7328
1942#1631,427#2,38610
1941#1591,384#1,68517
1940#1661,264#2,8717
1939#1601,345#2,4499
1938#1651,279#2,4799
1937#1631,229#2,08812
1936#1631,208#1,63917
1935#1641,198#2,24611
1934#1631,181#2,02213
1933#1611,142#2,36810
1932#1561,254#2,31311
1931#1611,171—
1930#1641,261#3,5926
1929#1671,214#2,45211
1928#1771,180#3,0768
1927#1691,286#3,4517
1926#1641,389#3,1398
1925#1651,439#3,1558
1924#1571,600—
1923#1601,483#4,2395
1922#1541,541#2,80110
1921#1521,583#2,80410
1920#1561,484#3,2088
1919#1491,488#3,1158
1918#1481,542#3,7286
1917#1571,339#3,9815
1916#1531,328#2,9268
1915#1561,205#3,0827
1914#151975#3,2645
1913#145827—
1912#151703—
1911#150537—
1910#150538#1,5895
1909#154462—
1908#159425—
1907#154420—
1906#158366—
1905#143421—
1904#152356—
1903#142383—
1902#141393—
1901#135369—
1900#153379#1,3105
1899#145324#1,0515
1898#138367—
1897#154297—
1896#137348—
1895#130351—
1894#136317—
1893#134321—
1892#122369—
1891#133267—
1890#124318—
1889#134266—
1888#129281—
1887#126226—
1886#130213—
1885#122212—
1884#114230—
1883#121174—
1882#109203—
1881#113157—
1880#109166—
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Rachel was already there! It came in at #109, and was given to 166 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 240 girls a year got the name.

Where Rachel is popular in 1952

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedAKMaine: #51 for girls · 48 births · 1 in 186 girlsMEVermont: #147 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 721 girlsVTNew Hampshire: #123 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 552 girlsNHWashington: #264 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 1,957 girlsWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedIDMontana: #230 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 1,282 girlsMTNorth Dakota: #149 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 765 girlsNDMinnesota: #237 for girls · 16 births · 1 in 2,204 girlsMNIllinois: #297 for girls · 33 births · 1 in 2,849 girlsILWisconsin: #197 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,742 girlsWIMichigan: #244 for girls · 38 births · 1 in 2,126 girlsMINew York: #204 for girls · 121 births · 1 in 1,276 girlsNYMassachusetts: #216 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 2,101 girlsMARhode Island: #117 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 630 girlsRIOregon: #272 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 2,075 girlsORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedSDIowa: #176 for girls · 24 births · 1 in 1,185 girlsIAIndiana: #211 for girls · 29 births · 1 in 1,606 girlsINOhio: #252 for girls · 43 births · 1 in 2,209 girlsOHPennsylvania: #230 for girls · 60 births · 1 in 1,851 girlsPANew Jersey: #348 for girls · 11 births · 1 in 4,420 girlsNJConnecticut: #234 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 2,250 girlsCTCalifornia: #145 for girls · 186 births · 1 in 706 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedUTColorado: #265 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,806 girlsCONebraska: #212 for girls · 9 births · 1 in 1,605 girlsNEMissouri: #236 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,968 girlsMOKentucky: #163 for girls · 32 births · 1 in 1,053 girlsKYWest Virginia: #181 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,234 girlsWVVirginia: #139 for girls · 53 births · 1 in 730 girlsVAMaryland: #212 for girls · 18 births · 1 in 1,447 girlsMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rachel, so not publishedDEArizona: #70 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 282 girlsAZNew Mexico: #158 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 667 girlsNMKansas: #221 for girls · 13 births · 1 in 1,585 girlsKSArkansas: #222 for girls · 15 births · 1 in 1,328 girlsARTennessee: #151 for girls · 42 births · 1 in 882 girlsTNNorth Carolina: #109 for girls · 92 births · 1 in 555 girlsNCSouth Carolina: #124 for girls · 56 births · 1 in 523 girlsSCDistrict of Columbia: #238 for girls · 8 births · 1 in 1,633 girlsDCOklahoma: #358 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 3,069 girlsOKLouisiana: #276 for girls · 21 births · 1 in 1,692 girlsLAMississippi: #171 for girls · 37 births · 1 in 762 girlsMSAlabama: #128 for girls · 58 births · 1 in 635 girlsALGeorgia: #150 for girls · 64 births · 1 in 688 girlsGAHawaii: #215 for girls · 7 births · 1 in 838 girlsHITexas: #110 for girls · 198 births · 1 in 538 girlsTXFlorida: #236 for girls · 23 births · 1 in 1,422 girlsFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Maine#51 · 1 in 186
  2. Arizona#70 · 1 in 282
  3. North Carolina#109 · 1 in 555
  4. Texas#110 · 1 in 538
  5. Rhode Island#117 · 1 in 630

Best ever in a state: #3 in Hawaii, 1995.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Maine#51481 in 186
Arizona#70371 in 282
North Carolina#109921 in 555
Texas#1101981 in 538
Rhode Island#117131 in 630
New Hampshire#12391 in 552
South Carolina#124561 in 523
Alabama#128581 in 635
Virginia#139531 in 730
California#1451861 in 706
Vermont#14751 in 721
North Dakota#14991 in 765
Georgia#150641 in 688
Tennessee#151421 in 882
New Mexico#158151 in 667
Kentucky#163321 in 1,053
Mississippi#171371 in 762
Iowa#176241 in 1,185
West Virginia#181181 in 1,234
Wisconsin#197231 in 1,742
New York#2041211 in 1,276
Indiana#211291 in 1,606
Maryland#212181 in 1,447
Nebraska#21291 in 1,605
Hawaii#21571 in 838
Massachusetts#216231 in 2,101
Kansas#221131 in 1,585
Arkansas#222151 in 1,328
Montana#23051 in 1,282
Pennsylvania#230601 in 1,851
Connecticut#23491 in 2,250
Florida#236231 in 1,422
Missouri#236211 in 1,968
Minnesota#237161 in 2,204
District of Columbia#23881 in 1,633
Michigan#244381 in 2,126
Ohio#252431 in 2,209
Washington#264141 in 1,957
Colorado#26591 in 1,806
Oregon#27281 in 2,075
Louisiana#276211 in 1,692
Illinois#297331 in 2,849
New Jersey#348111 in 4,420
Oklahoma#35871 in 3,069
Alaska———
Delaware———
Idaho———
Nevada———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rachel
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 4 spots since 2024 (#246 → #250)
  • 24 spots since 2020 (#226 → #250)
  • 83 spots since 2015 (#167 → #250)
  • Biggest jump: 49 spots in 1967 (#154 → #105)
  • Biggest drop: 35 spots in 2020 (#191 → #226)
Rise & fade · girls
116 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1996 at #9 (16,121 births)
  • Births halved by 2003, 7 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 10 for 1 yr
  • Top 10: 1 yr · 1996
  • Top 100: 43 yrs · run 1968–2010
  • Top 1,000: 146 yrs · run 1880–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 105
  • Highest: 1 in 105 girls born in 1985 were named Rachel (0.95%)
  • Latest: 1 in 1,312 girls born in 2025 (0.08%)
  • Its best rank, #9 in 1996, was only 1 in 109 (0.92%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
Era · girls
The 1990s
  • 26.0% of all girls named Rachel (149,167) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s2,128#109 (1882)#121
1890s3,279#122 (1892)#135
1900s3,974#135 (1901)#149
1910s10,482#145 (1913)#151
1920s14,199#152 (1921)#162
1930s12,268#156 (1932)#162
1940s13,409#159 (1941)#177
1950s16,775#175 (1953)#191
1960s26,795#69 (1969)#153
1970s77,749#23 (1976)#36
1980s146,675#13 (1985)#18
1990s149,167#9 (1996)#14
2000s68,401#21 (2000)#44
2010s21,076#99 (2010)#155
2020s7,580#226 (2020)#243

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rachel in 1952

girls
#185
1,599 births · 1 in 1,160 girls
boys
#2,376
11 births · 1 in 176,694 boys

Top girls' names in 1952

  1. #1Linda67,082
  2. #2Mary65,629
  3. #3Patricia53,101
  4. #4Deborah49,811
  5. #5Susan41,348
  6. #6Barbara39,864
  7. #7Nancy31,739
  8. #8Karen28,956
  9. #9Debra26,832
  10. #10Sandra26,097
  11. #185Rachel1,599

Top boys' names in 1952

  1. #1James87,065
  2. #2Robert86,588
  3. #3John83,140
  4. #4Michael79,037
  5. #5David71,752
  6. #6William63,039
  7. #7Richard58,350
  8. #8Thomas48,647
  9. #9Charles38,866
  10. #10Gary38,754
  11. #2,376Rachel11
More about 1952

girls

1,854,335 girls got a published name in 1952; 1 in 1,160 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 97.1% of the 6,389 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 23.2% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rachel
  1. #182Jacquelyn1,673
  2. #183Edith1,639
  3. #184Carmen1,608
  4. #185Rachel1,599
  5. #186Pauline1,595
  6. #187Roxanne1,578
  7. #188Veronica1,572
Biggest movers since 1951
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,501Pandora#3,284 → #783
  2. ↑ 368Lise#1,314 → #946
  3. ↑ 353Vanessa#656 → #303
  4. ↑ 334Dorinda#1,170 → #836
  5. ↑ 332Mitzi#928 → #596
Fallers
  1. ↓ 380Rhona#988 → #1,368
  2. ↓ 342Sharleen#765 → #1,107
  3. ↓ 270Enid#908 → #1,178
  4. ↓ 237Allyn#988 → #1,225
  5. ↓ 230Sheron#908 → #1,138

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

boys

1,943,633 boys got a published name in 1952; 1 in 176,694 of them was named Rachel, which outranked 44.2% of the 4,257 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 33.7% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rachel
  1. #2,251Wallie12
  2. #2,251Wesly12
  3. #2,251Wray12
  4. #2,376Rachel11
  5. #2,376Adrien11
  6. #2,376Alvan11
  7. #2,376Andreas11
  8. #2,514Abran10
  9. #2,514Abron10
  10. #2,514Adelbert10

Tied with 137 names at #2,376; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1951
Risers
  1. ↑ 753Darren#1,598 → #845
  2. ↑ 372Robby#1,242 → #870
  3. ↑ 355Cris#1,218 → #863
  4. ↑ 301Ethan#1,295 → #994
  5. ↑ 280Adan#1,150 → #870
Fallers
  1. ↓ 477Ottis#984 → #1,461
  2. ↓ 408Wayland#915 → #1,323
  3. ↓ 330Mcarthur#806 → #1,136
  4. ↓ 305Arvin#963 → #1,268
  5. ↓ 285Levon#881 → #1,166

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1952 →