Racine
Last seen for girls in 2005 at #16,462 · Last seen for boys in 2005 at #11,472
Given to girls 99.2% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1985 · 76 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 597since 1922
Racine over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Racine has never cracked the top 1,000 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | — | ||
| 2024 | — | — | ||
| 2023 | — | — | ||
| 2022 | — | — | ||
| 2021 | — | — | ||
| 2020 | — | — | ||
| 2019 | — | — | ||
| 2018 | — | — | ||
| 2017 | — | — | ||
| 2016 | — | — | ||
| 2015 | — | — | ||
| 2014 | — | — | ||
| 2013 | — | — | ||
| 2012 | — | — | ||
| 2011 | — | — | ||
| 2010 | — | — | ||
| 2009 | — | — | ||
| 2008 | — | — | ||
| 2007 | — | — | ||
| 2006 | — | — | ||
| 2005 | #16,462 | 5 | #11,472 | 5 |
| 2004 | #16,099 | 5 | — | |
| 2003 | #15,784 | 5 | — | |
| 2002 | — | — | ||
| 2001 | #13,521 | 6 | — | |
| 2000 | #15,031 | 5 | — | |
| 1999 | #11,385 | 7 | — | |
| 1998 | #14,122 | 5 | — | |
| 1997 | #9,802 | 8 | — | |
| 1996 | #9,581 | 8 | — | |
| 1995 | #10,514 | 7 | — | |
| 1994 | #8,804 | 9 | — | |
| 1993 | #9,559 | 8 | — | |
| 1992 | #9,491 | 8 | — | |
| 1991 | #7,430 | 11 | — | |
| 1990 | #5,835 | 15 | — | |
| 1989 | #4,358 | 21 | — | |
| 1988 | #6,277 | 12 | — | |
| 1987 | #4,857 | 16 | — | |
| 1986 | #4,028 | 20 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,575 | 76 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,470 | 38 | — | |
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | #7,649 | 7 | — | |
| 1977 | #6,892 | 8 | — | |
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | #7,435 | 6 | — | |
| 1972 | #8,292 | 5 | — | |
| 1971 | #7,388 | 6 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,413 | 9 | — | |
| 1969 | #7,471 | 5 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,222 | 11 | — | |
| 1967 | #4,625 | 9 | — | |
| 1966 | #4,198 | 10 | — | |
| 1965 | #5,289 | 7 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,355 | 10 | — | |
| 1963 | #3,801 | 12 | — | |
| 1962 | #6,578 | 5 | — | |
| 1961 | #4,239 | 10 | — | |
| 1960 | #4,437 | 9 | — | |
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #3,543 | 12 | — | |
| 1957 | #4,536 | 8 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,837 | 7 | — | |
| 1955 | #4,069 | 9 | — | |
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | #3,714 | 9 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | #5,244 | 5 | — | |
| 1948 | #2,974 | 12 | — | |
| 1947 | #3,448 | 10 | — | |
| 1946 | #3,430 | 9 | — | |
| 1945 | #4,556 | 5 | — | |
| 1944 | #3,139 | 9 | — | |
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | #4,250 | 5 | — | |
| 1938 | #3,847 | 6 | — | |
| 1937 | #3,800 | 6 | — | |
| 1936 | #4,181 | 5 | — | |
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | #4,286 | 5 | — | |
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | #4,411 | 5 | — | |
| 1931 | #4,331 | 5 | — | |
| 1930 | #3,658 | 7 | — | |
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | #4,805 | 5 | — | |
| 1926 | #3,269 | 9 | — | |
| 1925 | #4,973 | 5 | — | |
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | #4,967 | 5 | — | |
| 1922 | #5,009 | 5 | — | |
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1922
The first year at least five girls were named Racine! It came in at #5,009, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1922–1925, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
See more about Racine
Momentum · girls
Faded out
- Not published in 2025; last seen 2005
Rise & fade · girls
63 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1922
- Peaked 1985 at #1,575 (76 births)
- Births halved by 1986, 1 yr later
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 22,642
- Highest: 1 in 22,642 girls born in 1985 were named Racine (0.00%)
- Latest: 1 in 369,568 girls born in 2005 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 30.7% of all girls named Racine (183) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 29 | #3,269 (1926) | #4,605 |
| 1930s | 44 | #3,658 (1930) | #4,096 |
| 1940s | 50 | #2,974 (1948) | #3,799 |
| 1950s | 50 | #3,543 (1958) | #4,395 |
| 1960s | 88 | #3,801 (1963) | #4,922 |
| 1970s | 41 | #5,413 (1970) | #7,178 |
| 1980s | 183 | #1,575 (1985) | #3,928 |
| 1990s | 86 | #5,835 (1990) | #9,652 |
| 2000s | 26 | #13,521 (2001) | #15,379 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Racine ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: