Racquel
- #14,942 for girls in 2025, 5 births
- Last seen for boys in 1989 at #7,905
- Given to girls 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 1970 · 193 births
- Debut · girls
- 7 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 4,762since 1951
Racquel over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Racquel has never cracked the top 700 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #14,942 | 5 | — | |
| 2024 | #13,477 | 6 | — | |
| 2023 | #13,462 | 6 | — | |
| 2022 | #15,306 | 5 | — | |
| 2021 | #9,562 | 10 | — | |
| 2020 | #12,142 | 7 | — | |
| 2019 | #11,356 | 8 | — | |
| 2018 | #8,617 | 12 | — | |
| 2017 | #11,615 | 8 | — | |
| 2016 | #9,411 | 11 | — | |
| 2015 | #7,613 | 15 | — | |
| 2014 | #7,302 | 16 | — | |
| 2013 | #4,243 | 34 | — | |
| 2012 | #3,915 | 39 | — | |
| 2011 | #4,244 | 34 | — | |
| 2010 | #3,689 | 42 | — | |
| 2009 | #3,944 | 39 | — | |
| 2008 | #4,179 | 37 | — | |
| 2007 | #2,750 | 66 | — | |
| 2006 | #3,090 | 54 | — | |
| 2005 | #3,876 | 37 | — | |
| 2004 | #3,265 | 46 | — | |
| 2003 | #2,771 | 56 | — | |
| 2002 | #2,745 | 55 | — | |
| 2001 | #2,438 | 64 | — | |
| 2000 | #2,190 | 72 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,636 | 102 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,899 | 80 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,595 | 100 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,375 | 122 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,456 | 110 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,323 | 128 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,312 | 128 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,109 | 161 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,195 | 145 | — | |
| 1990 | #1,110 | 157 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,019 | 168 | #7,905 | 5 |
| 1988 | #918 | 185 | — | |
| 1987 | #980 | 161 | — | |
| 1986 | #1,122 | 129 | — | |
| 1985 | #1,172 | 121 | — | |
| 1984 | #1,232 | 105 | — | |
| 1983 | #1,266 | 98 | — | |
| 1982 | #1,257 | 103 | — | |
| 1981 | #1,396 | 88 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,206 | 109 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,517 | 77 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,397 | 83 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,538 | 70 | — | |
| 1976 | #1,343 | 80 | — | |
| 1975 | #973 | 127 | — | |
| 1974 | #1,209 | 91 | — | |
| 1973 | #1,015 | 115 | — | |
| 1972 | #958 | 127 | — | |
| 1971 | #812 | 171 | — | |
| 1970 | #758 | 193 | — | |
| 1969 | #810 | 162 | — | |
| 1968 | #1,042 | 100 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,272 | 28 | — | |
| 1966 | #4,493 | 9 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,733 | 12 | — | |
| 1964 | #4,636 | 9 | — | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | #5,851 | 6 | — | |
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | #6,103 | 5 | — | |
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | #5,040 | 6 | — | |
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | #4,385 | 7 | — | |
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1951
The first year at least five girls were named Racquel! It came in at #4,385, and was given to 7 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1952, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.
Where Racquel is popular in 2025
No state had 5 or more girls named Racquel in 2025, so the SSA doesn't publish it for any state.
See more about Racquel
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
- 2,800 spots since 2020 (#12,142 → #14,942)
- Biggest jump: 236 spots in 1975
- Biggest drop: 370 spots in 1976
Rise & fade · girls
19 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1951
- Peaked 1970 at #758 (193 births)
- Births halved by 1974, 4 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 7 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 7 yrs · run 1969–1972
Share of babies · girls
1 in 9,058
- Highest: 1 in 9,058 girls born in 1970 were named Racquel (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 321,453 girls born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · girls
The 1980s
- 26.6% of all girls named Racquel (1,267) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 18 | #4,385 (1951) | #5,176 |
| 1960s | 326 | #810 (1969) | #3,262 |
| 1970s | 1,134 | #758 (1970) | #1,152 |
| 1980s | 1,267 | #918 (1988) | #1,157 |
| 1990s | 1,233 | #1,109 (1992) | #1,401 |
| 2000s | 526 | #2,190 (2000) | #3,125 |
| 2010s | 219 | #3,689 (2010) | #7,201 |
| 2020s | 39 | #9,562 (2021) | #13,149 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Racquel ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: