Radley
#8,860 for girls in 2025, 11 births · #1,826 for boys in 2025, 87 births
Given to boys 92.3% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 2024 · 110 births
- Debut · boys
- 8 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 1,597since 1956
Radley over time
girlsboys
Rank within each sex, plotted together. Click any year to open it.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #8,860 | 11 | #1,826 | 87 |
| 2024 | #10,271 | 9 | #1,573 | 110 |
| 2023 | #9,616 | 10 | #1,774 | 91 |
| 2022 | #11,231 | 8 | #1,938 | 80 |
| 2021 | #15,251 | 5 | #2,439 | 55 |
| 2020 | #8,953 | 11 | #2,069 | 68 |
| 2019 | #9,736 | 10 | #2,464 | 54 |
| 2018 | #9,151 | 11 | #2,065 | 69 |
| 2017 | #9,943 | 10 | #2,388 | 54 |
| 2016 | #6,901 | 17 | #2,028 | 70 |
| 2015 | #11,835 | 8 | #2,112 | 66 |
| 2014 | #16,513 | 5 | #1,873 | 78 |
| 2013 | #13,150 | 7 | #2,090 | 64 |
| 2012 | #13,483 | 7 | #2,104 | 64 |
| 2011 | — | #2,798 | 42 | |
| 2010 | #16,992 | 5 | #2,467 | 50 |
| 2009 | — | #3,045 | 38 | |
| 2008 | — | #3,646 | 29 | |
| 2007 | — | #3,893 | 26 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,384 | 31 | |
| 2005 | — | #5,034 | 16 | |
| 2004 | — | #5,007 | 16 | |
| 2003 | — | #7,245 | 9 | |
| 2002 | — | #5,131 | 14 | |
| 2001 | — | #6,445 | 10 | |
| 2000 | — | #6,316 | 10 | |
| 1999 | — | #6,530 | 9 | |
| 1998 | — | #9,631 | 5 | |
| 1997 | — | #7,281 | 7 | |
| 1996 | — | #7,971 | 6 | |
| 1995 | — | #5,501 | 10 | |
| 1994 | — | #6,968 | 7 | |
| 1993 | — | #8,700 | 5 | |
| 1992 | — | #3,748 | 16 | |
| 1991 | — | #6,519 | 7 | |
| 1990 | — | #4,673 | 11 | |
| 1989 | — | #3,809 | 14 | |
| 1988 | — | #2,765 | 20 | |
| 1987 | — | #3,339 | 14 | |
| 1986 | — | #4,457 | 9 | |
| 1985 | — | #4,052 | 10 | |
| 1984 | — | #4,215 | 9 | |
| 1983 | — | #5,484 | 6 | |
| 1982 | — | #4,593 | 8 | |
| 1981 | — | #4,153 | 9 | |
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | #4,403 | 8 | |
| 1978 | — | #5,772 | 5 | |
| 1977 | — | #2,556 | 17 | |
| 1976 | — | #3,264 | 11 | |
| 1975 | — | #3,659 | 9 | |
| 1974 | — | #3,558 | 9 | |
| 1973 | — | #3,013 | 11 | |
| 1972 | — | #4,441 | 6 | |
| 1971 | — | #3,370 | 9 | |
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | #2,861 | 10 | |
| 1968 | — | #3,673 | 6 | |
| 1967 | — | #3,966 | 5 | |
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #2,969 | 8 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1956
The first year at least five boys were named Radley! It came in at #2,969, and was given to 8 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1957–1967, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
See more about Radley
Momentum · boys
Holding steady
- 253 spots since 2024 (#1,573 → #1,826)
- 243 spots since 2020 (#2,069 → #1,826)
- 286 spots since 2015 (#2,112 → #1,826)
Rise & fade · boys
68 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1956
- Peaked 2024 at #1,573 (110 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · boys
Never in the top 1,000
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · boys
1 in 15,663
- Highest: 1 in 15,663 boys born in 2024 were named Radley (0.01%)
- Latest: 1 in 19,633 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 2010s
- 38.3% of all boys named Radley (611) were born in this decade
Girls or boys?
Never flipped
- The majority has never changed
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 8 | #2,969 (1956) | #2,969 |
| 1960s | 21 | #2,861 (1969) | #3,500 |
| 1970s | 85 | #2,556 (1977) | #3,782 |
| 1980s | 99 | #2,765 (1988) | #4,096 |
| 1990s | 83 | #3,748 (1992) | #6,752 |
| 2000s | 199 | #3,045 (2009) | #4,915 |
| 2010s | 611 | #1,873 (2014) | #2,239 |
| 2020s | 491 | #1,573 (2024) | #1,937 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Radley ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: