Raegan
- #505 for girls in 2025, 589 births
- #12,008 for boys in 2025, 5 births
- Given to girls 98.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · girls
- 2019 · 1,406 births
- Debut · girls
- 9 births
- In top 100 · girls
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 25,214since 1963
Raegan over time
girls
Rank among girls' names. Raegan has never cracked the top 200 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #505 | 589 | #12,008 | 5 |
| 2024 | #458 | 683 | #7,257 | 11 |
| 2023 | #420 | 730 | #6,897 | 12 |
| 2022 | #324 | 994 | #7,768 | 10 |
| 2021 | #281 | 1,126 | #6,335 | 13 |
| 2020 | #259 | 1,172 | #5,699 | 15 |
| 2019 | #219 | 1,406 | #7,173 | 11 |
| 2018 | #264 | 1,245 | #4,739 | 20 |
| 2017 | #262 | 1,218 | #5,526 | 16 |
| 2016 | #282 | 1,133 | #4,943 | 19 |
| 2015 | #271 | 1,167 | #8,744 | 8 |
| 2014 | #323 | 1,025 | #9,642 | 7 |
| 2013 | #307 | 1,043 | #5,404 | 16 |
| 2012 | #295 | 1,082 | #8,158 | 9 |
| 2011 | #342 | 931 | #7,502 | 10 |
| 2010 | #359 | 889 | #8,803 | 8 |
| 2009 | #374 | 862 | #6,802 | 12 |
| 2008 | #395 | 816 | #11,037 | 6 |
| 2007 | #401 | 816 | #8,173 | 9 |
| 2006 | #438 | 727 | #8,732 | 8 |
| 2005 | #493 | 619 | #10,151 | 6 |
| 2004 | #492 | 598 | #4,602 | 18 |
| 2003 | #541 | 515 | — | |
| 2002 | #522 | 524 | #10,667 | 5 |
| 2001 | #550 | 478 | #7,536 | 8 |
| 2000 | #618 | 411 | #9,112 | 6 |
| 1999 | #714 | 317 | — | |
| 1998 | #757 | 284 | — | |
| 1997 | #792 | 263 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,032 | 181 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,120 | 158 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,357 | 123 | — | |
| 1993 | #1,898 | 74 | — | |
| 1992 | #2,239 | 59 | — | |
| 1991 | #2,420 | 52 | — | |
| 1990 | #3,022 | 37 | — | |
| 1989 | #3,477 | 29 | — | |
| 1988 | #3,393 | 28 | — | |
| 1987 | #3,857 | 22 | — | |
| 1986 | #3,757 | 22 | — | |
| 1985 | #5,077 | 14 | — | |
| 1984 | #3,874 | 20 | — | |
| 1983 | #4,476 | 16 | — | |
| 1982 | #4,527 | 16 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,028 | 51 | — | |
| 1980 | #1,433 | 85 | — | |
| 1979 | #1,364 | 90 | — | |
| 1978 | #1,487 | 76 | — | |
| 1977 | #1,380 | 81 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,060 | 42 | — | |
| 1975 | #1,381 | 76 | #5,464 | 5 |
| 1974 | #1,688 | 54 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,342 | 19 | — | |
| 1972 | #4,091 | 14 | — | |
| 1971 | #5,543 | 9 | — | |
| 1970 | #5,818 | 8 | — | |
| 1969 | #4,723 | 10 | — | |
| 1968 | #4,779 | 9 | — | |
| 1967 | #3,845 | 12 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,937 | 18 | — | |
| 1965 | #3,050 | 17 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,825 | 20 | — | |
| 1963 | #4,539 | 9 | — | |
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | #3,942 | 5 | |
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1963
The first year at least five girls were named Raegan! It came in at #4,539, and was given to 9 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1967–1971, when fewer than 13 girls a year got the name.
Where Raegan is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · girls
- West Virginia#204 · 1 in 634
- Connecticut#220 · 1 in 767
- New Hampshire#236 · 1 in 759
- Wisconsin#247 · 1 in 921
- Oregon#298 · 1 in 1,088
Best ever in a state: #49 in Wyoming, 2012.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #204 | 8 | 1 in 634 |
| Connecticut | #220 | 15 | 1 in 767 |
| New Hampshire | #236 | 5 | 1 in 759 |
| Wisconsin | #247 | 22 | 1 in 921 |
| Oregon | #298 | 12 | 1 in 1,088 |
| Michigan | #340 | 26 | 1 in 1,374 |
| Tennessee | #349 | 23 | 1 in 1,395 |
| Colorado | #354 | 17 | 1 in 1,372 |
| Iowa | #354 | 9 | 1 in 1,308 |
| Kentucky | #364 | 12 | 1 in 1,438 |
| Louisiana | #394 | 11 | 1 in 1,488 |
| Nebraska | #396 | 5 | 1 in 1,419 |
| Idaho | #402 | 5 | 1 in 1,433 |
| New Jersey | #404 | 19 | 1 in 1,868 |
| New York | #421 | 41 | 1 in 1,910 |
| Virginia | #433 | 18 | 1 in 1,875 |
| South Carolina | #440 | 11 | 1 in 1,663 |
| Pennsylvania | #443 | 24 | 1 in 1,945 |
| Ohio | #462 | 24 | 1 in 1,970 |
| Georgia | #470 | 24 | 1 in 1,884 |
| Washington | #478 | 14 | 1 in 2,061 |
| Massachusetts | #481 | 11 | 1 in 2,185 |
| Florida | #489 | 37 | 1 in 2,345 |
| North Carolina | #489 | 22 | 1 in 2,113 |
| Maryland | #511 | 10 | 1 in 1,999 |
| Illinois | #541 | 18 | 1 in 2,463 |
| Kansas | #578 | 5 | 1 in 2,362 |
| Indiana | #651 | 9 | 1 in 3,101 |
| Oklahoma | #697 | 5 | 1 in 2,956 |
| Alabama | #716 | 6 | 1 in 3,053 |
| Arizona | #748 | 8 | 1 in 3,527 |
| California | #800 | 37 | 1 in 4,371 |
| Missouri | #811 | 6 | 1 in 4,050 |
| Minnesota | #835 | 5 | 1 in 4,296 |
| Texas | #1,006 | 28 | 1 in 5,734 |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Raegan
Momentum · girls
Falling
- 246 spots since 2020 (#259 → #505)
- Biggest jump: 240 spots in 1997
- Biggest drop: 96 spots in 2023
Rise & fade · girls
56 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1963
- Peaked 2019 at #219 (1,406 births)
- Births halved by 2024, 5 yrs later
Top of the charts · girls
Top 1,000 for 29 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 29 yrs · run 1997–2025
Share of babies · girls
1 in 1,194
- Highest: 1 in 1,194 girls born in 2019 were named Raegan (0.08%)
- Latest: 1 in 2,729 girls born in 2025 (0.04%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
- 44.2% of all girls named Raegan (11,139) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 95 | #2,825 (1964) | #3,814 |
| 1970s | 469 | #1,364 (1979) | #2,815 |
| 1980s | 303 | #1,433 (1980) | #3,590 |
| 1990s | 1,548 | #714 (1999) | #1,535 |
| 2000s | 6,366 | #374 (2009) | #482 |
| 2010s | 11,139 | #219 (2019) | #292 |
| 2020s | 5,294 | #259 (2020) | #375 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Raegan ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: