Raekwon
Last seen for girls in 1996 at #11,807 · #8,243 for boys in 2025, 9 births
Given to boys 99.7% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1996 · 445 births
- Debut · boys
- 39 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 2,289since 1994
Raekwon over time
Rank among boys' names. Raekwon has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #8,243 | 9 | |
| 2024 | — | #6,199 | 14 | |
| 2023 | — | #4,886 | 20 | |
| 2022 | — | #4,850 | 20 | |
| 2021 | — | #4,118 | 25 | |
| 2020 | — | #5,235 | 17 | |
| 2019 | — | #6,104 | 14 | |
| 2018 | — | #4,610 | 21 | |
| 2017 | — | #8,140 | 9 | |
| 2016 | — | #8,146 | 9 | |
| 2015 | — | #6,676 | 12 | |
| 2014 | — | #9,642 | 7 | |
| 2013 | — | #8,789 | 8 | |
| 2012 | — | #8,864 | 8 | |
| 2011 | — | #7,009 | 11 | |
| 2010 | — | #4,848 | 19 | |
| 2009 | — | #5,102 | 18 | |
| 2008 | — | #4,714 | 20 | |
| 2007 | — | #4,243 | 23 | |
| 2006 | — | #3,384 | 31 | |
| 2005 | — | #2,902 | 36 | |
| 2004 | — | #2,102 | 56 | |
| 2003 | — | #2,031 | 56 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,609 | 75 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,231 | 108 | |
| 2000 | — | #1,009 | 145 | |
| 1999 | — | #837 | 180 | |
| 1998 | — | #683 | 249 | |
| 1997 | — | #618 | 282 | |
| 1996 | #11,807 | 6 | #483 | 445 |
| 1995 | — | #588 | 303 | |
| 1994 | — | #2,082 | 39 | |
| 1993 | — | — | ||
| 1992 | — | — | ||
| 1991 | — | — | ||
| 1990 | — | — | ||
| 1989 | — | — | ||
| 1988 | — | — | ||
| 1987 | — | — | ||
| 1986 | — | — | ||
| 1985 | — | — | ||
| 1984 | — | — | ||
| 1983 | — | — | ||
| 1982 | — | — | ||
| 1981 | — | — | ||
| 1980 | — | — | ||
| 1979 | — | — | ||
| 1978 | — | — | ||
| 1977 | — | — | ||
| 1976 | — | — | ||
| 1975 | — | — | ||
| 1974 | — | — | ||
| 1973 | — | — | ||
| 1972 | — | — | ||
| 1971 | — | — | ||
| 1970 | — | — | ||
| 1969 | — | — | ||
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | — | ||
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Raekwon! It came in at #2,082, and was given to 39 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 2012–2014, when fewer than 9 boys a year got the name.
Where Raekwon is popular in 1995
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Delaware#143 · 1 in 669
- North Carolina#174 · 1 in 1,042
- Maryland#180 · 1 in 1,135
- South Carolina#181 · 1 in 949
- Virginia#182 · 1 in 1,173
Best ever in a state: #83 in South Carolina, 1996.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | #143 | 6 | 1 in 669 |
| North Carolina | #174 | 43 | 1 in 1,042 |
| Maryland | #180 | 26 | 1 in 1,135 |
| South Carolina | #181 | 21 | 1 in 949 |
| Virginia | #182 | 34 | 1 in 1,173 |
| New Jersey | #235 | 28 | 1 in 1,769 |
| Connecticut | #280 | 8 | 1 in 2,414 |
| Georgia | #354 | 20 | 1 in 2,421 |
| New York | #404 | 39 | 1 in 3,137 |
| Pennsylvania | #406 | 18 | 1 in 3,938 |
| Massachusetts | #461 | 6 | 1 in 6,280 |
| Florida | #605 | 14 | 1 in 6,065 |
| Illinois | #699 | 11 | 1 in 7,511 |
| Ohio | #846 | 5 | 1 in 14,381 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| California | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Michigan | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Texas | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Raekwon
- 2,044 spots since 2024 (#6,199 → #8,243)
- 3,008 spots since 2020 (#5,235 → #8,243)
- 1,567 spots since 2015 (#6,676 → #8,243)
- Biggest jump: 1,494 spots in 1995 (#2,082 → #588)
- Biggest drop: 172 spots in 2000 (#837 → #1,009)
- Debuted 1994
- Peaked 1996 at #483 (445 births)
- Births halved by 1999, 3 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 5 yrs · run 1995–1999
- Highest: 1 in 4,257 boys born in 1996 were named Raekwon (0.02%)
- Latest: 1 in 189,786 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
- 65.4% of all boys named Raekwon (1,498) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,498 | #483 (1996) | #882 |
| 2000s | 568 | #1,009 (2000) | #2,833 |
| 2010s | 118 | #4,610 (2018) | #7,283 |
| 2020s | 105 | #4,118 (2021) | #5,589 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Raekwon in 1995
Top boys' names in 1995
More about 1995
boys
1,903,701 boys got a published name in 1995; 1 in 6,283 of them was named Raekwon, which outranked 94.3% of the 10,330 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 16.1% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).