Raelynn
#116 for girls in 2025, 2,326 births · Last seen for boys in 2024 at #10,938
Given to girls 99.9% of the time
- Peak · girls
- 2022 · 2,726 births
- Debut · girls
- 5 births
- In top 100 · girls
- 1 yrof 146 years
- Total births · girls
- 34,671since 1947
Raelynn over time
Rank among girls' names. Click any year to open it.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | #116 | 2,326 | — | |
| 2024 | #113 | 2,422 | #10,938 | 6 |
| 2023 | #112 | 2,415 | #8,921 | 8 |
| 2022 | #99 | 2,726 | #8,990 | 8 |
| 2021 | #103 | 2,683 | #12,146 | 5 |
| 2020 | #104 | 2,611 | #12,022 | 5 |
| 2019 | #113 | 2,573 | #10,803 | 6 |
| 2018 | #116 | 2,617 | — | |
| 2017 | #124 | 2,459 | — | |
| 2016 | #157 | 1,986 | — | |
| 2015 | #177 | 1,807 | #10,644 | 6 |
| 2014 | #265 | 1,238 | — | |
| 2013 | #283 | 1,121 | #9,655 | 7 |
| 2012 | #336 | 932 | — | |
| 2011 | #494 | 599 | — | |
| 2010 | #626 | 469 | — | |
| 2009 | #847 | 330 | — | |
| 2008 | #909 | 303 | — | |
| 2007 | #1,054 | 249 | — | |
| 2006 | #1,335 | 174 | — | |
| 2005 | #1,406 | 152 | — | |
| 2004 | #1,413 | 147 | — | |
| 2003 | #1,498 | 130 | — | |
| 2002 | #1,493 | 127 | — | |
| 2001 | #1,489 | 126 | — | |
| 2000 | #1,617 | 109 | — | |
| 1999 | #1,492 | 115 | — | |
| 1998 | #1,578 | 104 | — | |
| 1997 | #1,864 | 79 | — | |
| 1996 | #1,826 | 80 | — | |
| 1995 | #1,819 | 78 | — | |
| 1994 | #1,841 | 77 | — | |
| 1993 | #2,045 | 67 | — | |
| 1992 | #1,987 | 69 | — | |
| 1991 | #1,996 | 69 | — | |
| 1990 | #2,523 | 47 | — | |
| 1989 | #1,943 | 66 | — | |
| 1988 | #2,093 | 55 | — | |
| 1987 | #2,309 | 46 | — | |
| 1986 | #2,420 | 41 | — | |
| 1985 | #2,100 | 50 | — | |
| 1984 | #2,470 | 38 | — | |
| 1983 | #2,097 | 47 | — | |
| 1982 | #2,250 | 44 | — | |
| 1981 | #2,409 | 40 | — | |
| 1980 | #2,486 | 38 | — | |
| 1979 | #2,621 | 34 | — | |
| 1978 | #3,637 | 20 | — | |
| 1977 | #3,083 | 25 | — | |
| 1976 | #2,728 | 28 | — | |
| 1975 | #3,155 | 22 | — | |
| 1974 | #3,695 | 17 | — | |
| 1973 | #3,342 | 19 | — | |
| 1972 | #2,747 | 25 | — | |
| 1971 | #2,736 | 26 | — | |
| 1970 | #2,856 | 24 | — | |
| 1969 | #2,171 | 34 | — | |
| 1968 | #2,296 | 28 | — | |
| 1967 | #2,376 | 26 | — | |
| 1966 | #2,668 | 21 | — | |
| 1965 | #2,064 | 32 | — | |
| 1964 | #2,040 | 34 | — | |
| 1963 | #2,364 | 26 | — | |
| 1962 | #2,668 | 21 | — | |
| 1961 | #2,359 | 26 | — | |
| 1960 | #2,649 | 21 | — | |
| 1959 | #3,619 | 12 | — | |
| 1958 | #3,232 | 14 | — | |
| 1957 | #3,930 | 10 | — | |
| 1956 | #4,161 | 9 | — | |
| 1955 | #2,971 | 15 | — | |
| 1954 | #5,753 | 5 | — | |
| 1953 | #5,673 | 5 | — | |
| 1952 | #4,908 | 6 | — | |
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | #5,295 | 5 | — | |
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five girls were named Raelynn! It came in at #5,295, and was given to 5 baby girls.
Quietest stretch: 1947–1951, when fewer than 6 girls a year got the name.
Where Raelynn is popular in 2016
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- West Virginia#30 · 1 in 149
- Alaska#50 · 1 in 185
- Ohio#67 · 1 in 362
- Alabama#70 · 1 in 346
- Maine#72 · 1 in 257
Best ever in a state: #18 in West Virginia, 2020.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia | #30 | 41 | 1 in 149 |
| Alaska | #50 | 13 | 1 in 185 |
| Ohio | #67 | 144 | 1 in 362 |
| Alabama | #70 | 56 | 1 in 346 |
| Maine | #72 | 14 | 1 in 257 |
| Kentucky | #73 | 53 | 1 in 345 |
| Mississippi | #78 | 31 | 1 in 358 |
| Indiana | #80 | 77 | 1 in 393 |
| Missouri | #84 | 69 | 1 in 393 |
| South Carolina | #87 | 45 | 1 in 397 |
| Arkansas | #94 | 29 | 1 in 389 |
| Idaho | #94 | 18 | 1 in 358 |
| Wyoming | #94 | 5 | 1 in 231 |
| Kansas | #102 | 29 | 1 in 435 |
| Wisconsin | #103 | 52 | 1 in 448 |
| Tennessee | #106 | 63 | 1 in 493 |
| Oklahoma | #124 | 32 | 1 in 525 |
| Delaware | #125 | 7 | 1 in 376 |
| Georgia | #128 | 79 | 1 in 608 |
| Iowa | #131 | 26 | 1 in 500 |
| Minnesota | #132 | 41 | 1 in 599 |
| Virginia | #134 | 61 | 1 in 609 |
| Nebraska | #135 | 17 | 1 in 476 |
| Michigan | #144 | 67 | 1 in 628 |
| North Carolina | #145 | 70 | 1 in 647 |
| Washington | #152 | 48 | 1 in 670 |
| North Dakota | #154 | 7 | 1 in 474 |
| Florida | #164 | 115 | 1 in 754 |
| Maryland | #169 | 34 | 1 in 707 |
| Texas | #175 | 188 | 1 in 890 |
| New Mexico | #176 | 10 | 1 in 633 |
| South Dakota | #185 | 6 | 1 in 515 |
| Oregon | #195 | 20 | 1 in 760 |
| Louisiana | #196 | 28 | 1 in 750 |
| Arizona | #203 | 35 | 1 in 884 |
| Illinois | #204 | 62 | 1 in 929 |
| Pennsylvania | #224 | 52 | 1 in 997 |
| Colorado | #260 | 22 | 1 in 1,071 |
| Utah | #278 | 16 | 1 in 1,128 |
| Nevada | #319 | 9 | 1 in 1,240 |
| Connecticut | #350 | 8 | 1 in 1,541 |
| New York | #358 | 53 | 1 in 1,695 |
| California | #457 | 89 | 1 in 2,289 |
| New Jersey | #490 | 16 | 1 in 2,286 |
| Massachusetts | #522 | 10 | 1 in 2,548 |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Raelynn
- 3 spots since 2024 (#113 → #116)
- 12 spots since 2020 (#104 → #116)
- 61 spots since 2015 (#177 → #116)
- Biggest jump: 221 spots in 2010 (#847 → #626)
- Biggest drop: 13 spots in 2023 (#99 → #112)
- Debuted 1947
- Peaked 2022 at #99 (2,726 births)
- Not yet halved from its peak
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: 1 yr · 2022
- Top 1,000: 18 yrs · run 2008–2025
- Highest: 1 in 602 girls born in 2022 were named Raelynn (0.17%)
- Latest: 1 in 691 girls born in 2025 (0.14%)
- 45.6% of all girls named Raelynn (15,801) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 5 | #5,295 (1947) | #5,295 |
| 1950s | 76 | #2,971 (1955) | #4,281 |
| 1960s | 269 | #2,040 (1964) | #2,366 |
| 1970s | 240 | #2,621 (1979) | #3,060 |
| 1980s | 465 | #1,943 (1989) | #2,258 |
| 1990s | 785 | #1,492 (1999) | #1,897 |
| 2000s | 1,847 | #847 (2009) | #1,306 |
| 2010s | 15,801 | #113 (2019) | #269 |
| 2020s | 15,183 | #99 (2022) | #108 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Raelynn in 2016
Top girls' names in 2016
More about 2016
girls
1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 892 of them was named Raelynn, which outranked 99.2% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).