Raheem
- Last seen for girls in 1982 at #9,237
- #1,436 for boys in 2025, 125 births
- Given to boys 99.9% of the time
Showing
- Peak · boys
- 1993 · 556 births
- Debut · boys
- 5 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 8,524since 1964
Raheem over time
boys
Rank among boys' names. Raheem has never cracked the top 400 here.
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,436 | 125 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,364 | 138 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,242 | 157 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,245 | 158 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,230 | 156 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,106 | 179 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,102 | 179 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,135 | 170 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,061 | 187 | |
| 2016 | — | #1,199 | 158 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,210 | 152 | |
| 2014 | — | #1,218 | 150 | |
| 2013 | — | #1,297 | 133 | |
| 2012 | — | #1,328 | 128 | |
| 2011 | — | #1,305 | 131 | |
| 2010 | — | #1,390 | 120 | |
| 2009 | — | #1,403 | 121 | |
| 2008 | — | #1,251 | 139 | |
| 2007 | — | #1,405 | 116 | |
| 2006 | — | #1,350 | 120 | |
| 2005 | — | #1,453 | 101 | |
| 2004 | — | #1,404 | 101 | |
| 2003 | — | #1,210 | 121 | |
| 2002 | — | #1,044 | 147 | |
| 2001 | — | #1,027 | 143 | |
| 2000 | — | #914 | 169 | |
| 1999 | — | #828 | 183 | |
| 1998 | — | #736 | 221 | |
| 1997 | — | #708 | 223 | |
| 1996 | — | #623 | 278 | |
| 1995 | — | #570 | 321 | |
| 1994 | — | #515 | 384 | |
| 1993 | — | #417 | 556 | |
| 1992 | — | #509 | 395 | |
| 1991 | — | #686 | 217 | |
| 1990 | — | #768 | 174 | |
| 1989 | — | #795 | 156 | |
| 1988 | — | #938 | 105 | |
| 1987 | — | #884 | 112 | |
| 1986 | — | #1,028 | 81 | |
| 1985 | — | #967 | 89 | |
| 1984 | — | #976 | 83 | |
| 1983 | — | #795 | 121 | |
| 1982 | #9,237 | 6 | #780 | 127 |
| 1981 | — | #694 | 154 | |
| 1980 | — | #696 | 156 | |
| 1979 | — | #805 | 117 | |
| 1978 | — | #820 | 108 | |
| 1977 | — | #699 | 148 | |
| 1976 | — | #1,010 | 67 | |
| 1975 | — | #984 | 69 | |
| 1974 | — | #1,198 | 48 | |
| 1973 | — | #1,147 | 51 | |
| 1972 | — | #1,348 | 39 | |
| 1971 | — | #2,973 | 11 | |
| 1970 | — | #2,399 | 15 | |
| 1969 | — | #2,682 | 11 | |
| 1968 | — | — | ||
| 1967 | — | — | ||
| 1966 | — | — | ||
| 1965 | — | — | ||
| 1964 | — | #4,039 | 5 | |
| 1963 | — | — | ||
| 1962 | — | — | ||
| 1961 | — | — | ||
| 1960 | — | — | ||
| 1959 | — | — | ||
| 1958 | — | — | ||
| 1957 | — | — | ||
| 1956 | — | — | ||
| 1955 | — | — | ||
| 1954 | — | — | ||
| 1953 | — | — | ||
| 1952 | — | — | ||
| 1951 | — | — | ||
| 1950 | — | — | ||
| 1949 | — | — | ||
| 1948 | — | — | ||
| 1947 | — | — | ||
| 1946 | — | — | ||
| 1945 | — | — | ||
| 1944 | — | — | ||
| 1943 | — | — | ||
| 1942 | — | — | ||
| 1941 | — | — | ||
| 1940 | — | — | ||
| 1939 | — | — | ||
| 1938 | — | — | ||
| 1937 | — | — | ||
| 1936 | — | — | ||
| 1935 | — | — | ||
| 1934 | — | — | ||
| 1933 | — | — | ||
| 1932 | — | — | ||
| 1931 | — | — | ||
| 1930 | — | — | ||
| 1929 | — | — | ||
| 1928 | — | — | ||
| 1927 | — | — | ||
| 1926 | — | — | ||
| 1925 | — | — | ||
| 1924 | — | — | ||
| 1923 | — | — | ||
| 1922 | — | — | ||
| 1921 | — | — | ||
| 1920 | — | — | ||
| 1919 | — | — | ||
| 1918 | — | — | ||
| 1917 | — | — | ||
| 1916 | — | — | ||
| 1915 | — | — | ||
| 1914 | — | — | ||
| 1913 | — | — | ||
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
First appearance
1964
The first year at least five boys were named Raheem! It came in at #4,039, and was given to 5 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1964–1968, when fewer than 6 boys a year got the name.
Where Raheem is popular in 2025
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
Top states · boys
- Virginia#670 · 1 in 3,725
- Maryland#702 · 1 in 3,816
- Florida#958 · 1 in 6,824
- Michigan#999 · 1 in 6,699
- New Jersey#1,022 · 1 in 7,953
Best ever in a state: #96 in South Carolina, 1993.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | #670 | 10 | 1 in 3,725 |
| Maryland | #702 | 6 | 1 in 3,816 |
| Florida | #958 | 14 | 1 in 6,824 |
| Michigan | #999 | 6 | 1 in 6,699 |
| New Jersey | #1,022 | 5 | 1 in 7,953 |
| Ohio | #1,111 | 6 | 1 in 8,756 |
| North Carolina | #1,277 | 5 | 1 in 10,294 |
| Illinois | #1,280 | 5 | 1 in 9,910 |
| New York | #1,297 | 8 | 1 in 10,553 |
| Georgia | #1,350 | 5 | 1 in 10,044 |
| Texas | #1,483 | 12 | 1 in 14,588 |
| California | #2,203 | 6 | 1 in 29,246 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arizona | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Colorado | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kansas | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| Nevada | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Washington | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Raheem
Momentum · boys
Falling
- 330 spots since 2020 (#1,106 → #1,436)
- Biggest jump: 311 spots in 1977
- Biggest drop: 181 spots in 1984
Rise & fade · boys
29 yrs to peak
- Debuted 1964
- Peaked 1993 at #417 (556 births)
- Births halved by 1996, 3 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 24 yrs
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 24 yrs · run 1987–2000
Share of babies · boys
1 in 3,528
- Highest: 1 in 3,528 boys born in 1993 were named Raheem (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 13,665 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · boys
The 1990s
- 34.6% of all boys named Raheem (2,952) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16 | #2,682 (1969) | #3,361 |
| 1970s | 673 | #699 (1977) | #1,338 |
| 1980s | 1,184 | #694 (1981) | #855 |
| 1990s | 2,952 | #417 (1993) | #636 |
| 2000s | 1,278 | #914 (2000) | #1,246 |
| 2010s | 1,508 | #1,061 (2017) | #1,225 |
| 2020s | 913 | #1,106 (2020) | #1,271 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Want to check a specific year?
See where Raheem ranked and which names it was up against. Click a point on the chart, or pick a year: