Rahma

#2,239 for girls in 2025, 82 births

Peak · girls
2016 · 97 births
Debut · girls
6 births
In top 100 · girls
never
of 146 years
Total births · girls
1,532
since 1990

Rahma over time

girls

Rank among girls' names. Rahma has never cracked the top 2,000 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020202016peak #2,033, 2016girls
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirls
rankbirths
2025#2,23982
2024#2,24883
2023#2,24483
2022#2,51071
2021#2,38475
2020#2,50069
2019#2,53869
2018#2,40475
2017#2,40175
2016#2,03397
2015#2,43175
2014#3,08054
2013#2,76962
2012#3,52345
2011#2,86860
2010#2,97657
2009#3,80041
2008#5,27927
2007#4,56732
2006#3,85439
2005#3,73039
2004#4,49230
2003#5,09224
2002#4,62126
2001#5,57020
2000#4,40027
1999#6,19116
1998#6,07316
1997#5,41718
1996#7,57411
1995#9,5538
1994#9,5868
1993#13,4425
1992#10,4797
1991—
1990#11,4096
1989—
1988—
1987—
1986—
1985—
1984—
1983—
1982—
1981—
1980—
1979—
1978—
1977—
1976—
1975—
1974—
1973—
1972—
1971—
1970—
1969—
1968—
1967—
1966—
1965—
1964—
1963—
1962—
1961—
1960—
1959—
1958—
1957—
1956—
1955—
1954—
1953—
1952—
1951—
1950—
1949—
1948—
1947—
1946—
1945—
1944—
1943—
1942—
1941—
1940—
1939—
1938—
1937—
1936—
1935—
1934—
1933—
1932—
1931—
1930—
1929—
1928—
1927—
1926—
1925—
1924—
1923—
1922—
1921—
1920—
1919—
1918—
1917—
1916—
1915—
1914—
1913—
1912—
1911—
1910—
1909—
1908—
1907—
1906—
1905—
1904—
1903—
1902—
1901—
1900—
1899—
1898—
1897—
1896—
1895—
1894—
1893—
1892—
1891—
1890—
1889—
1888—
1887—
1886—
1885—
1884—
1883—
1882—
1881—
1880—
First appearance
1990

The first year at least five girls were named Rahma! It came in at #11,409, and was given to 6 baby girls.


Quietest stretch: 1991, when fewer than 5 girls a year got the name.

Where Rahma is popular in 2016

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedNDMinnesota: #454 for girls · 12 births · 1 in 2,045 girlsMNIllinois: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedILWisconsin: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedWIMichigan: #1,278 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 8,414 girlsMINew York: #1,087 for girls · 14 births · 1 in 6,417 girlsNYMassachusetts: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedMARhode Island: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedINOhio: #878 for girls · 10 births · 1 in 5,207 girlsOHPennsylvania: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedCTCalifornia: #2,970 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 33,953 girlsCAUtah: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedNEMissouri: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedMOKentucky: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedKYWest Virginia: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedWVVirginia: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedVAMaryland: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedMDDelaware: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedARTennessee: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedTNNorth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedNCSouth Carolina: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedOKLouisiana: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedLAMississippi: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedMSAlabama: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedALGeorgia: #1,499 for girls · 5 births · 1 in 9,610 girlsGAHawaii: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedHITexas: #2,856 for girls · 6 births · 1 in 27,882 girlsTXFlorida: fewer than 5 girls named Rahma, so not publishedFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · girls
  1. Minnesota#454 · 1 in 2,045
  2. Ohio#878 · 1 in 5,207
  3. New York#1,087 · 1 in 6,417
  4. Michigan#1,278 · 1 in 8,414
  5. Georgia#1,499 · 1 in 9,610

Best ever in a state: #390 in Minnesota, 2023.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Minnesota#454121 in 2,045
Ohio#878101 in 5,207
New York#1,087141 in 6,417
Michigan#1,27851 in 8,414
Georgia#1,49951 in 9,610
Texas#2,85661 in 27,882
California#2,97061 in 33,953
Alabama———
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Florida———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Illinois———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Kentucky———
Louisiana———
Maine———
Maryland———
Massachusetts———
Mississippi———
Missouri———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
North Carolina———
North Dakota———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Pennsylvania———
Rhode Island———
South Carolina———
South Dakota———
Tennessee———
Utah———
Vermont———
Virginia———
Washington———
West Virginia———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the girls born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Rahma
Momentum · girls
Holding steady
  • 9 spots since 2024 (#2,248 → #2,239)
  • 261 spots since 2020 (#2,500 → #2,239)
  • 192 spots since 2015 (#2,431 → #2,239)
Rise & fade · girls
26 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1990
  • Peaked 2016 at #2,033 (97 births)
  • Not yet halved from its peak
Top of the charts · girls
Never in the top 1,000
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: never
Share of babies · girls
1 in 18,268
  • Highest: 1 in 18,268 girls born in 2016 were named Rahma (0.01%)
  • Latest: 1 in 19,601 girls born in 2025 (0.01%)
Era · girls
The 2010s
  • 43.7% of all girls named Rahma (669) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1990s95#5,417 (1997)#8,858
2000s305#3,730 (2005)#4,541
2010s669#2,033 (2016)#2,702
2020s463#2,239 (2025)#2,354

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 girls in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Rahma in 2016

girls
#2,033
97 births · 1 in 18,268 girls

Top girls' names in 2016

  1. #1Emma19,550
  2. #2Olivia19,414
  3. #3Ava16,354
  4. #4Sophia16,185
  5. #5Isabella14,863
  6. #6Mia14,464
  7. #7Charlotte13,118
  8. #8Abigail11,796
  9. #9Emily11,006
  10. #10Amelia10,809
  11. #2,033Rahma97
More about 2016

girls

1,772,022 girls got a published name in 2016; 1 in 18,268 of them was named Rahma, which outranked 89.2% of the 18,885 girls' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 8.3% of girls (24.6% in 1880, 7.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Rahma
  1. #2,017Taelynn98
  2. #2,017Theia98
  3. #2,017Xitlali98
  4. #2,033Rahma97
  5. #2,033Aleeah97
  6. #2,033Amor97
  7. #2,033Billie97
  8. #2,054Aeris96
  9. #2,054Alyna96
  10. #2,054Brigitte96

Tied with 20 names at #2,033; 3 shown. Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 2015
Risers
  1. ↑ 2,389Kehlani#3,254 → #865
  2. ↑ 612Royalty#1,146 → #534
  3. ↑ 481Saoirse#1,448 → #967
  4. ↑ 396Ophelia#978 → #582
  5. ↑ 364Aitana#915 → #551
Fallers
  1. ↓ 542Caitlin#610 → #1,152
  2. ↓ 451Caitlyn#598 → #1,049
  3. ↓ 397Katelynn#652 → #1,049
  4. ↓ 382Kaitlynn#989 → #1,371
  5. ↓ 340Neriah#946 → #1,286

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 2016 →