Ramiro
Last seen for girls in 1996 at #13,518 · #1,073 for boys in 2025, 201 births
Given to boys 99.9% of the time
- Peak · boys
- 1981 · 366 births
- Debut · boys
- 9 births
- In top 100 · boys
- neverof 146 years
- Total births · boys
- 25,930since 1913
Ramiro over time
Rank among boys' names. Ramiro has never cracked the top 400 here.
Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.
Show data table
| Year | girls | boys | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rank | births | rank | births | |
| 2025 | — | #1,073 | 201 | |
| 2024 | — | #1,160 | 180 | |
| 2023 | — | #1,185 | 171 | |
| 2022 | — | #1,121 | 189 | |
| 2021 | — | #1,034 | 209 | |
| 2020 | — | #1,058 | 189 | |
| 2019 | — | #1,057 | 193 | |
| 2018 | — | #1,036 | 196 | |
| 2017 | — | #1,003 | 202 | |
| 2016 | — | #935 | 224 | |
| 2015 | — | #1,023 | 198 | |
| 2014 | — | #888 | 243 | |
| 2013 | — | #866 | 246 | |
| 2012 | — | #829 | 264 | |
| 2011 | — | #823 | 264 | |
| 2010 | — | #773 | 287 | |
| 2009 | — | #710 | 335 | |
| 2008 | — | #658 | 369 | |
| 2007 | — | #591 | 431 | |
| 2006 | — | #565 | 443 | |
| 2005 | — | #571 | 408 | |
| 2004 | — | #532 | 445 | |
| 2003 | — | #540 | 427 | |
| 2002 | — | #504 | 452 | |
| 2001 | — | #459 | 528 | |
| 2000 | — | #497 | 459 | |
| 1999 | — | #475 | 477 | |
| 1998 | — | #492 | 442 | |
| 1997 | — | #471 | 458 | |
| 1996 | #13,518 | 5 | #452 | 485 |
| 1995 | — | #465 | 480 | |
| 1994 | — | #457 | 480 | |
| 1993 | — | #453 | 482 | |
| 1992 | — | #456 | 480 | |
| 1991 | #13,147 | 5 | #451 | 476 |
| 1990 | — | #478 | 426 | |
| 1989 | — | #493 | 375 | |
| 1988 | — | #496 | 337 | |
| 1987 | — | #490 | 326 | |
| 1986 | — | #499 | 308 | |
| 1985 | — | #511 | 292 | |
| 1984 | — | #468 | 323 | |
| 1983 | — | #463 | 325 | |
| 1982 | — | #466 | 330 | |
| 1981 | — | #433 | 366 | |
| 1980 | — | #475 | 316 | |
| 1979 | — | #474 | 301 | |
| 1978 | #9,750 | 5 | #456 | 306 |
| 1977 | — | #457 | 309 | |
| 1976 | — | #446 | 306 | |
| 1975 | — | #461 | 306 | |
| 1974 | #6,258 | 8 | #446 | 314 |
| 1973 | — | #466 | 282 | |
| 1972 | — | #471 | 278 | |
| 1971 | #8,324 | 5 | #530 | 229 |
| 1970 | — | #539 | 225 | |
| 1969 | — | #494 | 244 | |
| 1968 | — | #498 | 230 | |
| 1967 | — | #528 | 198 | |
| 1966 | — | #530 | 206 | |
| 1965 | — | #548 | 195 | |
| 1964 | — | #537 | 214 | |
| 1963 | — | #520 | 237 | |
| 1962 | — | #534 | 223 | |
| 1961 | — | #530 | 223 | |
| 1960 | — | #504 | 248 | |
| 1959 | — | #545 | 207 | |
| 1958 | — | #527 | 214 | |
| 1957 | — | #518 | 219 | |
| 1956 | — | #517 | 213 | |
| 1955 | — | #501 | 218 | |
| 1954 | — | #480 | 225 | |
| 1953 | — | #461 | 241 | |
| 1952 | — | #492 | 205 | |
| 1951 | — | #501 | 182 | |
| 1950 | — | #489 | 189 | |
| 1949 | — | #489 | 184 | |
| 1948 | — | #476 | 198 | |
| 1947 | — | #499 | 182 | |
| 1946 | — | #490 | 172 | |
| 1945 | — | #510 | 138 | |
| 1944 | — | #531 | 130 | |
| 1943 | — | #602 | 110 | |
| 1942 | — | #646 | 97 | |
| 1941 | — | #586 | 102 | |
| 1940 | — | #689 | 77 | |
| 1939 | — | #629 | 87 | |
| 1938 | — | #749 | 67 | |
| 1937 | — | #609 | 91 | |
| 1936 | — | #537 | 114 | |
| 1935 | — | #750 | 67 | |
| 1934 | — | #585 | 102 | |
| 1933 | — | #629 | 85 | |
| 1932 | — | #607 | 95 | |
| 1931 | — | #605 | 95 | |
| 1930 | — | #560 | 115 | |
| 1929 | — | #655 | 89 | |
| 1928 | — | #752 | 73 | |
| 1927 | — | #747 | 76 | |
| 1926 | — | #944 | 52 | |
| 1925 | — | #772 | 73 | |
| 1924 | — | #993 | 50 | |
| 1923 | — | #882 | 59 | |
| 1922 | — | #977 | 52 | |
| 1921 | — | #1,122 | 40 | |
| 1920 | — | #1,416 | 27 | |
| 1919 | — | #1,408 | 26 | |
| 1918 | — | #1,539 | 23 | |
| 1917 | — | #1,693 | 19 | |
| 1916 | — | #2,389 | 11 | |
| 1915 | — | #2,621 | 9 | |
| 1914 | — | #2,101 | 10 | |
| 1913 | — | #1,945 | 9 | |
| 1912 | — | — | ||
| 1911 | — | — | ||
| 1910 | — | — | ||
| 1909 | — | — | ||
| 1908 | — | — | ||
| 1907 | — | — | ||
| 1906 | — | — | ||
| 1905 | — | — | ||
| 1904 | — | — | ||
| 1903 | — | — | ||
| 1902 | — | — | ||
| 1901 | — | — | ||
| 1900 | — | — | ||
| 1899 | — | — | ||
| 1898 | — | — | ||
| 1897 | — | — | ||
| 1896 | — | — | ||
| 1895 | — | — | ||
| 1894 | — | — | ||
| 1893 | — | — | ||
| 1892 | — | — | ||
| 1891 | — | — | ||
| 1890 | — | — | ||
| 1889 | — | — | ||
| 1888 | — | — | ||
| 1887 | — | — | ||
| 1886 | — | — | ||
| 1885 | — | — | ||
| 1884 | — | — | ||
| 1883 | — | — | ||
| 1882 | — | — | ||
| 1881 | — | — | ||
| 1880 | — | — | ||
The first year at least five boys were named Ramiro! It came in at #1,945, and was given to 9 baby boys.
Quietest stretch: 1913–1916, when fewer than 12 boys a year got the name.
Where Ramiro is popular in 2009
- Rank in state
- Top 10
- 11–50
- 51–100
- 101–500
- 501+
- Not published
Hover or tap a state for its numbers.
- Texas#299 · 1 in 1,665
- California#396 · 1 in 2,816
- Nevada#424 · 1 in 2,393
- Arizona#538 · 1 in 3,630
- Kansas#558 · 1 in 3,349
Best ever in a state: #117 in Texas, 1948.
Show every state
| State | Rank | Births | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | #299 | 112 | 1 in 1,665 |
| California | #396 | 86 | 1 in 2,816 |
| Nevada | #424 | 6 | 1 in 2,393 |
| Arizona | #538 | 11 | 1 in 3,630 |
| Kansas | #558 | 5 | 1 in 3,349 |
| Colorado | #560 | 8 | 1 in 3,593 |
| Washington | #566 | 10 | 1 in 3,696 |
| Illinois | #602 | 17 | 1 in 4,268 |
| North Carolina | #708 | 10 | 1 in 5,384 |
| Michigan | #920 | 6 | 1 in 8,226 |
| Florida | #942 | 12 | 1 in 7,941 |
| Alabama | — | — | — |
| Alaska | — | — | — |
| Arkansas | — | — | — |
| Connecticut | — | — | — |
| Delaware | — | — | — |
| District of Columbia | — | — | — |
| Georgia | — | — | — |
| Hawaii | — | — | — |
| Idaho | — | — | — |
| Indiana | — | — | — |
| Iowa | — | — | — |
| Kentucky | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | — | — | — |
| Maine | — | — | — |
| Maryland | — | — | — |
| Massachusetts | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | — | — | — |
| Mississippi | — | — | — |
| Missouri | — | — | — |
| Montana | — | — | — |
| Nebraska | — | — | — |
| New Hampshire | — | — | — |
| New Jersey | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | — | — | — |
| New York | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | — | — | — |
| Ohio | — | — | — |
| Oklahoma | — | — | — |
| Oregon | — | — | — |
| Pennsylvania | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | — | — | — |
| South Carolina | — | — | — |
| South Dakota | — | — | — |
| Tennessee | — | — | — |
| Utah | — | — | — |
| Vermont | — | — | — |
| Virginia | — | — | — |
| West Virginia | — | — | — |
| Wisconsin | — | — | — |
| Wyoming | — | — | — |
Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.
See more about Ramiro
- 87 spots since 2024 (#1,160 → #1,073)
- 15 spots since 2020 (#1,058 → #1,073)
- 50 spots since 2015 (#1,023 → #1,073)
- Biggest jump: 221 spots in 1925 (#993 → #772)
- Biggest drop: 172 spots in 1926 (#772 → #944)
- Debuted 1913
- Peaked 1981 at #433 (366 births)
- Births halved by 2023, 42 yrs later
- Top 10: never
- Top 100: never
- Top 1,000: 94 yrs · run 1922–2014
- Highest: 1 in 3,680 boys born in 2001 were named Ramiro (0.03%)
- Latest: 1 in 8,498 boys born in 2025 (0.01%)
- Its best rank, #433 in 1981, was only 1 in 4,894 (0.02%) — a smaller share of a much bigger birth year
- 18.1% of all boys named Ramiro (4,686) were born in this decade
Show by decade
| Decade | Births | Best rank | Avg rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 107 | #1,408 (1919) | #1,957 |
| 1920s | 591 | #655 (1929) | #926 |
| 1930s | 918 | #537 (1936) | #626 |
| 1940s | 1,390 | #476 (1948) | #552 |
| 1950s | 2,113 | #461 (1953) | #503 |
| 1960s | 2,218 | #494 (1969) | #522 |
| 1970s | 2,856 | #446 (1974) | #475 |
| 1980s | 3,298 | #433 (1981) | #479 |
| 1990s | 4,686 | #451 (1991) | #465 |
| 2000s | 4,297 | #459 (2001) | #563 |
| 2010s | 2,317 | #773 (2010) | #923 |
| 2020s | 1,139 | #1,034 (2021) | #1,105 |
All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.
Ramiro in 2009
Top boys' names in 2009
More about 2009
boys
1,983,573 boys got a published name in 2009; 1 in 5,921 of them was named Ramiro, which outranked 95.1% of the 14,540 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 9.2% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).