Randolph

Last seen for girls in 1986 at #10,912 · #4,857 for boys in 2025, 20 births
Given to boys 99.8% of the time

Showing
Show data for
Peak · boys
1952 · 1,817 births
Debut · boys
19 births
In top 100 · boys
never
of 146 years
Total births · boys
49,424
since 1880

Randolph over time

boys

Rank among boys' names. Randolph has never cracked the top 100 here.

#1#10#100#1,000#10,000rank188019001920194019601980200020201918peak #154, 1952boys
Hover or use arrow keys to read values by year; click or press Enter to open that year.

Gaps mean fewer than 5 babies received the name that year, so the SSA doesn't publish it.

Show data table
Yeargirlsboys
rankbirthsrankbirths
2025—#4,85720
2024—#5,44317
2023—#3,71230
2022—#4,85020
2021—#5,11018
2020—#3,73428
2019—#4,00326
2018—#2,99439
2017—#2,84042
2016—#3,16136
2015—#2,68445
2014—#2,46151
2013—#2,80441
2012—#2,63246
2011—#2,20359
2010—#2,51149
2009—#2,32056
2008—#2,29157
2007—#1,99570
2006—#1,80876
2005—#1,77274
2004—#1,85766
2003—#1,57880
2002—#1,295104
2001—#1,242107
2000—#1,228109
1999—#1,25998
1998—#1,159108
1997—#1,045122
1996—#985127
1995—#847162
1994—#912143
1993—#770185
1992—#790177
1991—#679223
1990—#672227
1989—#638245
1988—#598245
1987—#580247
1986#10,9125#553258
1985—#480326
1984—#505279
1983—#454332
1982—#480314
1981—#443346
1980—#480308
1979—#428350
1978#9,7505#426345
1977—#398387
1976—#395382
1975—#406355
1974—#397382
1973#6,0808#384403
1972—#387412
1971#8,3245#384435
1970—#332569
1969—#315590
1968—#304603
1967—#296614
1966#6,5645#269747
1965#4,8318#265779
1964—#270817
1963#5,8916#252909
1962—#249986
1961#6,5675#2411,069
1960#5,6966#2441,081
1959#5,0317#2461,072
1958#6,1035#2221,185
1957#6,0865#1991,357
1956#5,3256#1781,634
1955—#1621,765
1954—#1631,765
1953#3,68710#1611,714
1952—#1541,817
1951#5,4145#1601,637
1950#4,7386#1621,550
1949—#1711,361
1948#5,2435#1821,143
1947—#205963
1946—#205836
1945#4,5565#214645
1944—#227607
1943#4,6915#220665
1942—#246535
1941—#280418
1940—#287382
1939—#280393
1938—#302328
1937—#307300
1936—#327275
1935—#306312
1934—#340259
1933—#360228
1932—#345256
1931—#370232
1930—#339271
1929—#399212
1928—#331293
1927—#352275
1926—#343281
1925—#363267
1924—#370265
1923—#340295
1922—#351284
1921—#369270
1920—#339293
1919—#372242
1918—#377247
1917—#337265
1916—#327263
1915—#361220
1914—#331192
1913—#337148
1912—#306141
1911—#31474
1910—#30465
1909—#29260
1908—#30352
1907—#34140
1906—#30445
1905—#31640
1904—#34434
1903—#31835
1902—#33534
1901—#38324
1900—#29250
1899—#38423
1898—#33533
1897—#34629
1896—#40024
1895—#34029
1894—#37624
1893—#34926
1892—#30936
1891—#36422
1890—#38921
1889—#33827
1888—#38723
1887—#43815
1886—#36922
1885—#38821
1884—#45017
1883—#44816
1882—#46915
1881—#39518
1880—#39219
First appearance
1880

In the first year the SSA published name data, Randolph was already there! It came in at #392, and was given to 19 baby boys.


Quietest stretch: 1880–1887, when fewer than 23 boys a year got the name.

Where Randolph is popular in 1918

  • Rank in state
  • Top 10
  • 11–50
  • 51–100
  • 101–500
  • 501+
  • Not published
Alaska: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedAKMaine: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedMEVermont: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedVTNew Hampshire: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedNHWashington: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedWAIdaho: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedIDMontana: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedMTNorth Dakota: #172 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 969 boysNDMinnesota: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedMNIllinois: #425 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 7,802 boysILWisconsin: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedWIMichigan: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedMINew York: #470 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 11,223 boysNYMassachusetts: #271 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 4,072 boysMARhode Island: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedRIOregon: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedORNevada: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedNVWyoming: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedWYSouth Dakota: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedSDIowa: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedIAIndiana: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedINOhio: #463 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 9,598 boysOHPennsylvania: #475 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 12,343 boysPANew Jersey: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedNJConnecticut: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedCTCalifornia: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedCAUtah: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedUTColorado: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedCONebraska: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedNEMissouri: #415 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 5,353 boysMOKentucky: #398 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 3,843 boysKYWest Virginia: #240 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 1,753 boysWVVirginia: #91 for boys · 45 births · 1 in 489 boysVAMaryland: #181 for boys · 6 births · 1 in 1,962 boysMDDelaware: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedDEArizona: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedAZNew Mexico: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedNMKansas: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedKSArkansas: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedARTennessee: #318 for boys · 7 births · 1 in 3,127 boysTNNorth Carolina: #352 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 3,256 boysNCSouth Carolina: #194 for boys · 14 births · 1 in 1,382 boysSCDistrict of Columbia: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedDCOklahoma: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedOKLouisiana: #300 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 2,152 boysLAMississippi: #287 for boys · 8 births · 1 in 2,225 boysMSAlabama: #448 for boys · 5 births · 1 in 4,588 boysALGeorgia: #206 for boys · 20 births · 1 in 1,462 boysGAHawaii: fewer than 5 boys named Randolph, so not publishedHITexas: #404 for boys · 13 births · 1 in 3,267 boysTXFlorida: #178 for boys · 9 births · 1 in 977 boysFL

Hover or tap a state for its numbers.

Top states · boys
  1. Virginia#91 · 1 in 489
  2. North Dakota#172 · 1 in 969
  3. Florida#178 · 1 in 977
  4. Maryland#181 · 1 in 1,962
  5. South Carolina#194 · 1 in 1,382

Best ever in a state: #62 in Alaska, 1955.

Show every state
StateRankBirthsShare
Virginia#91451 in 489
North Dakota#17271 in 969
Florida#17891 in 977
Maryland#18161 in 1,962
South Carolina#194141 in 1,382
Georgia#206201 in 1,462
West Virginia#24081 in 1,753
Massachusetts#27181 in 4,072
Mississippi#28781 in 2,225
Louisiana#30081 in 2,152
Tennessee#31871 in 3,127
North Carolina#35291 in 3,256
Kentucky#39861 in 3,843
Texas#404131 in 3,267
Missouri#41551 in 5,353
Illinois#42571 in 7,802
Alabama#44851 in 4,588
Ohio#46351 in 9,598
New York#47081 in 11,223
Pennsylvania#47571 in 12,343
Alaska———
Arizona———
Arkansas———
California———
Colorado———
Connecticut———
Delaware———
District of Columbia———
Hawaii———
Idaho———
Indiana———
Iowa———
Kansas———
Maine———
Michigan———
Minnesota———
Montana———
Nebraska———
Nevada———
New Hampshire———
New Jersey———
New Mexico———
Oklahoma———
Oregon———
Rhode Island———
South Dakota———
Utah———
Vermont———
Washington———
Wisconsin———
Wyoming———

Ranks are within each state; “1 in N” is out of the boys born there that year. The SSA only publishes a name in a state when 5 or more babies of one sex got it.

See more about Randolph
Momentum · boys
Falling
  • 586 spots since 2024 (#5,443 → #4,857)
  • 1,123 spots since 2020 (#3,734 → #4,857)
  • 2,173 spots since 2015 (#2,684 → #4,857)
  • Biggest jump: 92 spots in 1900 (#384 → #292)
  • Biggest drop: 142 spots in 1994 (#770 → #912)
Rise & fade · boys
72 yrs to peak
  • Debuted 1880
  • Peaked 1952 at #154 (1,817 births)
  • Births halved by 1964, 12 yrs later
Top of the charts · boys
Top 1,000 for 117 yrs
  • Top 10: never
  • Top 100: never
  • Top 1,000: 117 yrs · run 1880–1996
Share of babies · boys
1 in 1,070
  • Highest: 1 in 1,070 boys born in 1952 were named Randolph (0.09%)
  • Latest: 1 in 85,404 boys born in 2025 (0.00%)
Era · boys
The 1950s
  • 31.4% of all boys named Randolph (15,496) were born in this decade
Show by decade
DecadeBirthsBest rankAvg rank
1880s193#338 (1889)#407
1890s267#309 (1892)#359
1900s414#292 (1909)#323
1910s1,857#304 (1910)#337
1920s2,735#331 (1928)#356
1930s2,854#280 (1939)#328
1940s7,555#171 (1949)#224
1950s15,496#154 (1952)#181
1960s8,195#241 (1961)#271
1970s4,020#332 (1970)#394
1980s2,900#443 (1981)#521
1990s1,572#672 (1990)#912
2000s799#1,228 (2000)#1,739
2010s434#2,203 (2011)#2,829
2020s133#3,712 (2023)#4,618

All figures count published births only (names given to at least 5 boys in a year). Registrations before 1937 are incomplete, so early shares and totals run low.

Randolph in 1918

boys
#377
247 births · 1 in 4,103 boys

Top boys' names in 1918

  1. #1John56,558
  2. #2William45,291
  3. #3James42,115
  4. #4Robert40,619
  5. #5Charles26,921
  6. #6George26,318
  7. #7Joseph26,261
  8. #8Edward19,489
  9. #9Frank17,018
  10. #10Thomas13,910
  11. #377Randolph247
More about 1918

boys

1,013,480 boys got a published name in 1918; 1 in 4,103 of them was named Randolph, which outranked 92.2% of the 4,813 boys' names that year. The ten most popular names covered 31.0% of boys (44.2% in 1880, 8.0% in 2025).

Ranked beside Randolph
  1. #373Pasquale250
  2. #373Ramon250
  3. #376Sterling249
  4. #377Randolph247
  5. #377Noah247
  6. #379Buster246
  7. #379Coy246
  8. #381Miles245

Tied names share a rank, as in SSA's lists.

Biggest movers since 1917
Risers
  1. ↑ 600Quinton#1,092 → #492
  2. ↑ 542Pershing#876 → #334
  3. ↑ 480Quentin#723 → #243
  4. ↑ 440Issac#1,264 → #824
  5. ↑ 339Furman#1,092 → #753
Fallers
  1. ↓ 473Bernhard#900 → #1,373
  2. ↓ 424Edson#919 → #1,343
  3. ↓ 394Gasper#919 → #1,313
  4. ↓ 352Berton#934 → #1,286
  5. ↓ 346Ishmael#997 → #1,343

Among names in the top 1,000 of either year.

See the top 100 for 1918 →